Well, regarding to Buddhism, there is some textual animosity
  towards Islam from the 9th century:
  [1]http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Kalachakra_Tantra [there's other
  sources too - it's well known] but of course, the argument goes,
  it's an anomaly that can be ignored because it goes against the
  tenets of the earlier establishment of the religion. Like
  anything, it's all about the relative importance ascribed to it
  by the people implementing it. I'll return to the 'text only' as
  danger in this regard; as not all texts can have equal
  importance and there's no single book or group of books that are
  enough for a society to function properly. Everything can't be
  written down - it's just not possible - and within even that
  which is, what to keep, what to ignore is up to the spirit of
  the times as it were and/or to the willful choice of individuals
  who choose to highlight or bury certain phrases in light of the
  needs or desires of their whims or their cultures (spirit of the
  times).

References

  Visible links
  1. https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwikiislam.net%2Fwiki%2FKalachakra_Tantra&h=bAQEhr4ii

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.