- No idea. That's the point. Just because something is the "best
  of class" for today, does not mean it will be "best of class'
  tomorrow.

  I like the engineering point of view a little better. It's not
  that the Scientific Method is invalid; nothing so dramatic as
  that, but rather, it's incomplete. Baffled by the subjective. It
  always has been. Attempts to eliminate the validity of the
  subjective form and the insistence upon objectivity-only renders
  it so. Incomplete. What it cannot understand, it calls illusion.
  But if all is natural, nothing is illusion but rather enacted
  processes and perspectives overlapping.

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.