liked Clark - I have a positive 'feeling' when hearing his name,
  so I intuitively know there's something I liked but I also
  remember something that seemed a little off or too much. I'd
  have to go through and see. I did find this which I saved back
  in 7/2015 which explained my final position on the distinctions.

  "I am a fan of this family of thinking. I like to say I "tend
  towards" embodied cognition and while extended, embodied,
  enacted, situated, and others draw lines slightly differently,
  they're all compatible and I'm definitely a fan of the family.
  [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action-specific_perception -
  for me, Affordance was the biggest eye opener once it 'clicked'
  when first tripped over Lakoff, which opened the door for this
  whole marvelous way of thinking that didn't open doors, it
  eliminated the doors and the walls entirely."

  I remember getting into debates over the distinctions until I
  realized it was a kind of nit-picking that really didn't matter,
  as the fight between the family of non-dualist
  environment-including perspectives vs the orthodox viewpoints
  was more important than pinning it down precisely for me, just
  yet.

  The basic concept is still foreign enough to most people as it
  is smile emoticon

References

  Visible links
  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action-specific_perception

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.