I'm not proving right or wrongness. Just the ability of humans
  to comprehend difficult constructs and how they relate them to
  their cultural-historical knowledge.

  In the case of QM, Aubrey Terrill saw my simple point right
  away.

  You're making it far too complicated. Thank you and yes, I do.
  That's why I'm still here. I learn with every exchange with
  people. I never waste a word for my own purposes, even if
  someone doesn't comprehend me properly. My baseline for Trinity
  is simple. Ecumenical Councils. Church as it stood in 325-500ad
  approximately. All the afterwards stuff? Doesn't matter.

  Also, there is most DEFINITELY hot debate in QM. There are MANY
  competing theories, each with their own cheering squad.

  It's far from a fixed in stone thing. And yes, he is. He has the
  sun rising in Florida. Thank you and Gerald Bogan for your time
  tonight. I enjoyed it and have gained a lot of material (my own
  words, I don't copy other people's) for some ridiculous book
  that will sell no copies. Not a word wasted.

  My narcissistic bed awaits. and I enjoyed our time together and
  will catch up tomorrow if there's more for whatever reason that
  may be smile emoticon

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.