I've been writing in "post modern" for a VERY long time. It
  unfortunately comes too easily to me. It sucks really, because I
  forget I do it and then I wonder why people don't understand me
  sometimes, unless they speak the postmodern language and yes,
  it's crap, but you said 'ontology' which sparked it. tongue
  emoticon

  Anyway, existence of a deity.

  Going by your definition:
  "i cannot claim knowledge of the existence nor the not existence
  of a god "

  Ok, this is the excluded middle I was talking about.

  You cannot claim knowledge of the existence and the not
  existence simultaneously because they appear to be a logical
  contradiction.

  But I can. Because I don't know. I can have superimposed beliefs
  that appear contradictory but they are not because they depend
  on context, not on text.

  If something doesn't make sense, ask and i'll rephrase.

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.