Well, before viewing it, I notice something: It's from Cracked.
Now, Cracked is a satire magazine, but it's not _pure_ satire
like TheOnion, where you're certain it's faked. Rather, there's
a _possibility_ of partial truths mixed in with a bit of
humorous insanity with Cracked. So, judging an article by its
author, It automatically raises skeptical flags before even
continuing into it. But I'll check it out in a minute to give my
synopsis bearing that in mind.
