At the moment, for all intent and purposes, yes they do smile
  emoticon We can still try to predict them and toss all the math
  we want at it and I believe we _should_ [just as we should with
  the mind] but I believe we have a LONG LONG way to go before we
  can predict things like this with near-certainty. I honestly
  believe it may well be impossible utilizing the ways-of-thinking
  we have been/currently are using. There are fundamental flaws in
  our approaches towards it that reflect in our predictive
  capabilities. Not that i think impure functional programming in
  parallel message passing processing will fix it, but it'd be a
  start. But with millions of lines of FORTRAN to go through, it's
  the best we got for now smile emoticon

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.