I have a fear of loss of information.
  I was in the library today and noticing how the reference
  materials were all dated 2006, 2009, 2002. These publishers
  stopped publishing paper books, putting the information
  exclusively online.

  Now, I want to see *everything* online - a lot of stuff is
  trapped in books even today, so I'm grateful things are going
  online.. but...

  here's the problem:

  DIgitized information is a fragile thing. I don't want to go
  into the technical details of it, but suffice to say, it's very
  fragile on far too many levels. It's easy to wipe out the
  Internet as we know it. I could do it from my chair, right here.
  It's not difficult and there are quite a number of ways.

  Now, there's nothing magical about books to me, but they have
  something the 'net doesn't have: object permanence. A library is
  on fire, some books are saved, some fragments remain.

  But consider this:

  Where will THIS MESSAGE be in 10 years?

  The likelihood of Facebook still being here is pretty small. It
  *might* exist in 10 years but it's more likely that it won't be
  here. Or, if it is here, where will this message from way back
  in July 2015 be in 2025?

  Good luck finding it.

  This is a problem. Loss of history happening as we speak. These
  very words.

  Now, I conveyed that fear in a few Vines but I considered it
  carefully. What's an unintended consequence of this "fear of
  loss of information"?

  Let's say a 9 yr old kid sees it. It sinks in deeply for some
  reason I can't fathom.

  It leads to a compulsion. What kind of compulsion could it lead
  to? Saving data? Backing up? Remembering to remember what people
  say? Becoming a hoarder? OCD? Never throwing a scrap of anything
  away?

  Worst case scenarios. All possible. Maybe even worse things are
  possible. But of what I considered, *more fear* being received
  than I "intend" - amplified by their own psychological nature
  won't be in an area that I consider "a bad thing".

  But... notice how in just a couple of messages, I misinterpreted
  what you wrote: it went from "emergent tech being a threat" to
  "Hawking calls for ban on AI robots" and concluded, incorrectly,
  that AI research should be banned.

  It's not what you intended, but it's what happened. That stuff
  happens all of the time. People make connections. We can't
  always be AWARE of the connections people are going to make but
  it's good to try.

  It's more than just one's own reputation; I don't care so much
  about my own reputation; but I *do* care about people treating
  each other well. I can't see any better way to make a better
  future than to try to make nicer people who are then nicer to
  others,and people who are fearless, not in proving their fears
  right - but fearless in pursuing their dreams instead of their
  fears.

  Anyway, that's a load of babble from me but when you said,
  "responsibility for the future" , this is the train of thought I
  jumped on.