Thank you response - it's quite helpful.
Logical solvency is an interesting choice of words - solvency, a
term from the world of finance to indicate just how much better
the assets are than the liabilities - and the synonyms of the
word are telling:
[1]
http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/solvency
[I love a thesaurus for it gives the general concept of a word
and takes it out of its home context into related - and
sometimes unrelated areas, but in this case, the synonyms are
very consistent to your apparent (to me) meaning].
Synthetic agreement - by this in a "grounded in reality" sense
or a "in the ways that are not analytical in nature" - which I
suppose amounts to the same things... the gounded-in-reality
argument sees analytical philosophy as 'head-in-the-clouds' and
the "ways that aren't analytical", which has a slightly negative
connotation from the analytical 2+2=4 is all that matters camp.
So if I can attempt a poor rephrasing:
a) It holds together in an analytical sense - if not perfectly,
at least quite well - in a 2+2=4, all cats are mammals sense,
although not necessarily wedded to a particular system of logic,
so long as the logic being used is internally consistent.
This would be akin to a working structure - the engineer's
drawing, the model.
b) It's realistic, to put it in a blunt term. The engineer's
plans are agreeable to the stakeholders, the community, its
aesthetic in senses other than its logical consistency.
c) In general, there's gotta be an agent. There's change.
There's a before causing an after.
Let me know what I got wrong here.
References
Visible links
1.
https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thesaurus.com%2Fbrowse%2Fsolvency&h=aAQHrlhCz
