One thing I like about Wikipedia is that its users will toss in
  unexpected links to other fields.... reminders that a lot of
  these concepts are "signs of the times" (sorry - signs? get it?
  tongue emoticon anyway...) -
  [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narrative_therapy
  and I find, when a subject is _difficult_, go _outside_ of the
  context you're constrained to, see it from another perspective,
  then come back again.

  I'm sure the method I use falls within _one_ of these
  philosophical schools of thought, but I don't know which one.
  After all, I believe I'm a product of the generation I grew up
  in, and all my assumptions were laid out within it, and only
  through deconstructing the assumptions given to me do I have a
  hope of reconstructing a 'me' that's more... authentic.

  So, even though I may be using the same possibly flawed tools to
  analyze possibly flawed tools, nonetheless, it's not a
  mathematical thing. I can go from disbelief to belief, from
  congruity to incongruity back to another congruity anytime I
  wish ... a concept that ALSO is likely paralleled by something
  already bootstrapped in my past.

  But I'm ok with that tongue emoticon Fear of infinite recursion
  is ridiculous, imo.

References

  Visible links
  1. https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FNarrative_therapy&h=oAQFEzs_y

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.