This is good for me; it's helping me to identify the many flaws
  in how I am attempting to describe what I believe my beliefs to
  be, by having a few of my words compared to known systems.

  I most definitely overstated my point (which was based upon an
  incorrect interpretation on what you had written)... as I don't
  see myself as a believer in Epiphenominalism as an entirely
  complete model.

  Taken out of the context of the rest of what I said, though, I
  can see where that statement has Epiphenominologicalist
  leanings. [say that word three times... wait... maybe not]

  *whew* this really is tough stuff to pin down with precision and
  very easy to step into unwanted territories...

  I don't see them as a mirror.

  I stated:
  "I see them as co-dependent reinforcing systems.
  I don't believe they function in a balanced fashion either. "

  In short, not a mirror. I see them more akin to emergent
  properties based upon their relationship with each other, which
  is not a closed loop either, but requires an ongoing dependency
  upon the environment.

  a reinforces b reinforces c inhibits a reinforces b inhibits a

  That type of relationship, not as a strict linear causal chain.

  My leanings towards embodied cognition [which I did not
  explicitly state in these writings but have in the past)
  indicate this, as we have a history of these discussions,
  although it was my error to depend upon your recollection.

  In short, the system as a whole must be considered, with things
  picked out for analysis for occasional convenience, without
  losing sight of the entirety in the process.

  Example: You picked several quotes, lifted them from my text,
  then expanded upon them _as if_ they stood alone.

  They did not stand alone however.

  Taking them out of context to define what sphere they fall into
  is helpful, as I will attempt greater caution in choosing my
  words carefully, but I would hope that the other statements
  within the context successfully defend an embodied / grounded /
  enacted / reflexive mode that sees the mind/body problem as
  necessarily part of its environment and inseparable from it.