Hm. You've given me much food for thought, and I appreciate you
taking the time to find a key phrase to pull out and expand upon
that resonates within the structure you prefer to use.
I have a problem, however.
"With objective agency being the primary or monad condition, we
can say that subjectivity is being cognitively ignorant of the
underlying objective agency that makes up our consciousness.
Subjectivity is a lack of understanding of Self. In monist
materialism this is referred to as "eliminative materialism"."
I do not believe that the Subjective's IGNORANCE of the
underlying physical system and its manner of function
NECESSITATES Elimination of the validity of the Subjective.
Why?
I see an underlying assumption laying dormant that is unspoken.
The underlying assumption that I see here is that the OBJECTIVE
is _capable_ of entirely explaining the SUBJECTIVE.
I don't believe it can.
The functioning nervous system has no need to be aware of its
PRODUCTS, just as the PRODUCTS have no need to be aware of its
functioning.
In short, the objectivity is functionally ignorant of the
subjectivity in its entirety, just as the subjectivity is
functionally ignorant of the objectivity in its entirety.
I see them as co-dependent reinforcing systems.
I don't believe they function in a balanced fashion either.
There can certainly be a great difference between the two. I
don't believe functioning consciousness is required for the
Universe to exist but for us to have an accurate model of
reality, we must include the subjective aspects of consciousness
for it is with this very consciousness that we are perceiving
the world with and to not credit it with validity in the
majority of cases [there are always exceptions like illusions
and such] it is, nevertheless, GENERALLY reliable; it must be
for we depend on it to even come up with objective descriptions
of reality.
