That perhaps is about the most concise possible answer, next to
"Because."; but Curiosity is even better. *I* think you should
win this. Then again, I'm not sure if Curiosity has a place
within Philosophical dialogue but if it doesn't, it should. Were
I a judge and that was the answer, I would need no further
evidence. The need to keep the person out of society would be
clear and with one further answer, "What were you curious
about?" that would determine which University department I would
make him Chair of... for there is no better way to be removed
from society than to Chair a Department at University, with the
one equivalent position that of a political role.
