Well my personal opinion is that "I don't know" either way.
  Every elegant explanation as to why/how things happen has its
  flaws so to me it's silly to "play sports" with them and pick
  teams.

  I wasn't there to see it :P

  Take away words like impossible, and some of the hyperbole about
  "worried about losing their careers " and you would get a Like
  or agreement from me. I don't think Evolutionary theory as it
  stands is perfect by any means, and the field of biology just
  keeps plugging along dong the best its can to classify nature
  and generally doesn't get involved in these things.

  Except my new buddy Koichiro Matsuno who advocates a shift from
  3rd to 1st person.. and utilizing the Dative form to better
  reflect the emergence of time and a more plausable evolutionary
  theory bridging the gap better between atom and cell as it were.

  [1]https://doaj.org/article/7f442546b604407ab558159c1afe5f43

  But to me it's descriptors of how things are. None of these
  things take away God; neither proving nor disproving. But I'm
  agnostic. I don't know. But I like understanding how things
  work, or appear to. [2]t note: I'm not trying to prove a point
  of any kind really. I'm just excited to find someone (he
  invented protobiology back in the late 80s so he's kinda a big
  deal) - who understands my conceptualization of Time which makes
  Time as personal from every perspective of the Universe as it is
  for me, all based on its needs. I like that. A lot. And I didn't
  have to write the papers for it either.

References

  Visible links
  1. https://doaj.org/article/7f442546b604407ab558159c1afe5f43
  2. https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.