Consider machines that operate in States.
  All the parameters that were set for the "me" that was having
  this conversation got switched to OTHER parameters once my
  nephew came out and started talking pokemon and roblox. "Set
  Shifting" is the psychological term but same notion.
  Then, surprise, there's a birthday party in the kitchen with a
  bunch of ppl around (not mine) and I have to be...
  ...
  ..
  social. An entirely DIFFERENT set of parameters. I'm a state
  machine. My machine is set to a different state.

  I think of less of a 'series" of you's but rather a set of
  "states of you" which switch around. I have different sets of
  thoughts. Different memories. Different reactions to what
  otherwise might be the same external events.

  But information/time is a relationship, not an abstraction. It's
  a part of the system.

  So now that I am sitting back here in this conversation, I am
  remembering what we were talking about. My state machine has the
  parameters set for this conversation.

  Is it me? Are they all me? Yes. It's all me.

  Time is dependent upon the needs of the subject (or another
  subject's needs on another subject. In short... my nephew needs
  created a DIFFERENT time for me, he brought "me" into himself
  for his needs... and, being a nice uncle, once I got over being
  annoyed with being ripped away from this conversation with you I
  was enjoying, I created time *for* him through transactions and
  setting my machine's state to match not just the 'situation' but
  to match specifically the needs of the one I am transacting
  with. This takes away the issue of consciousness altogether. In
  a very real sense, it allows all things to have a kind of free
  will, regardless of their predictability or not.

  The states are set from within, dependent upon the needs of the
  system as they negotiate with the world outside of the subject
  and take IN information (whether that information be chemicals,
  words, electrons, whatever) FROM whatever it is from the outside
  that provides it.

  The articles use of the DATIVE case is, indeed quite perfect in
  explorations of the emergence of Time as a property of
  information transfer based upon a subjects needs.

  It could be a form of pantheism but honestly, there's no need
  for that, unless one wants to go there. Just goings from and
  comings to.