* I wouldn't have a problem with being an automaton but I also
      believe that free will is true and exists.

      I type werojwoiejfo weijwe wefij

      Predictive capability? Chomsky can't capture gibberish. But
      I can produce it. It is within my degrees of freedom.
      Insomuch as I *may* be an automaton, I have free will.

      I don't think free will is necessarily intangible however.
      But it may be at its deepest root, unpredictable without
      being random. Patternless once the stereotypes are removed
      from it.
      [1]2 mins * [2]Like
    * [3][IMG]
      [4]Kenneth Udut We cannot analogize our experience of
      subjectivity to anything else. It is unique. A singularity
      perhaps. Humans cannot comprehend things that cannot be
      analogized in some way; this is my belief and so in that
      sense, it may always remain intangible to *us*, but perhaps
      not fundamentally intangible.



References

  Visible links
  1. https://www.facebook.com/groups/neoacademiaannex/permalink/669650716490062/?comment_id=669672899821177&offset=0&total_comments=14
  2. Like this comment
       https://www.facebook.com/groups/neoacademiaannex/669650716490062/?notif_t=group_comment_follow#
  3. https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi
  4. https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.