* Sieves. Layers, The thin layer of "what is distinctly human
about our brains" is 6 six cell thick layer of icing on our
pudding filled skull cake.
It's not that Truth is necessarily *entirely* relative.
There's a series of sieves for Truth, and they sift down and
up and side-to-side.
Like sifting for gold, sometimes they come up with
Nothing... yet the gold might be stuck in one of the sieve
layers.
The measure lacking in both the objectivist and subjectivist
position alike is that of Prudence.
They have prudence for their own position as it were
(leaving things unsaid for the sake of strengthening their
own position) but not being prudent with regards to their
competition.
There's a lot to be said for civility. It strengthens one's
argument immeasurably beyond any attempt at mathematical
equivalence.
Then again, Im a bit of an ironist myself...
[1]58 mins * [2]Like
* [3][IMG]
[4]Kenneth Udut Of course, the biggest trouble with a
relativist position, imo, is a basic one: Making statement
that 1<>1 (or 1 !=1) by using a 1=1 argument. [everything is
relative... except the statement "everything is relative"...
which is absolute
References
Visible links
1.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/neoacademiaannex/permalink/641483022640165/?comment_id=641860699269064&offset=0&total_comments=51
2. Like this comment
https://www.facebook.com/groups/neoacademiaannex/?fref=nf#
3.
https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi
4.
https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi
