Yeah. Well, I believe many laws are set up as "innocent until
  proven guilty" *because* most _people_ seems to behave as
  "guilty until proven innocent" - and the legal system attempts
  to provide a counter-balance to the way that many people seem to
  think.

  I don't think there's a right here.. that's the hard part. It's
  about approach. I try to see both at the same time; one eye
  open. I suspect you do too, really. You listen, willing to
  accept while also keeping a skeptical eye open at the same time.
  I try to suspend judgement for the longest time possible while
  also being sure not to get into any business dealings with
  people unless I trust them or if I must... and I try to extend
  my trust to people as far as I feel they can be trusted.

  So, I'd say cautious optimism tends to be my way. Better? Worse?
  I dunno. It seems to fit my nature. nature/nature? eh, well,
  both. I can trace enough of it back to comedians and
  entertainers that I liked along with other things from my
  childhood.

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.