* The measuring tools we use are enhancements and refinements
to our own natural systems. A computer that measures and
sees, measures and sees in the ways that a human can measure
and see. The conceptions that are possible for a computer
are limited by its programming and technical abilities, as
are we.
So the reality being measured is the reality that is true
for our use. Rumsfelds "Unknown unknowns" comes into play
here (amazing that he has the best formulation of the
concept, put concisely enough to stick him straight into the
philosophy department from a press conference -but it
works).
So naturally a computer that we create,will have
measurements that match up with other human measurements,
and consistently with the measurements of other humans
because it was made by us, for us, and thinks somewhat like
us. It's our creation, programmed by our thought processes
and assumptions.
[1]1 hr * [2]Like * [3]1
* [4][IMG]
[5]Kenneth Udut In short, the computer agrees with humans
because it must.
It has been programmed with all of our assumptions built-in.
Wonderful tool, still forever limited, even if it gained
consciousness.
At its best, it would only be capable of what the best or
worst of humanity would be capable of doing or conceiving
because, even self-programming machines are limited by the
assumptions of the initial programmers
References
Visible links
1.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/neoacademiaannex/permalink/634575706664230/?comment_id=635215216600279&offset=50&total_comments=158
2. Like this comment
https://www.facebook.com/groups/neoacademiaannex/permalink/634575706664230/#
3.
https://www.facebook.com/browse/likes?id=635215216600279
4.
https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi
5.
https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi
