That's better :D The reason I sided with Funkanic wasn't for
atheism (I'm neither atheist nor theist; I'm a bit of both, a
bit of neither; they're both kind of irrelevant for me
personally - I'm not trying to speak for everybody) - but I had
to agree with his initial claims of passive-aggression. The
reason why I know passive-aggressive so well?* It's because I'VE
been called on it.* And I was honestly shocked because I didn't
even realize I was doing it.* Happened a few months ago,
elsewhere online but it was a good reminder to be honest in what
I think and what I feel when communicating, as best I can. I
can't speak for the points you've brought up; You might well be
right; the video might have nothing to do with religion, and
Funkanic's comment might have been unnecessary or even
compatitive for all of the reasons you've stated.* Or perhaps
not* Or perhaps something inbetween. But now, at least, you've
given substance that can be debated; challenged; agreed;
accepted; rejected; fought, won, lost; picked apart, coallated
and stapled. For that, I want to say "Thanks!" and that's not
being sarcastic.* I believe fully in freedom of expression and
you've expressed yourself freely in your last comment.* I wish I
could say something more specific about it but honestly, I don't
remember the contents of the video (it's been a while since I
saw it) :P
