[1]5 April, 2014 at 5:21 pm
All things are understand via analogy. Analogies built upon
analogies. Language patterns analogize from one person who
speaks *the same language* analogizes to language patterns in
another. The shapes are similar which assists in understanding.
But they*re not typically exactly the same, which is why we have
have misunderstanding. Each of their utterings/writings and
their understandings/interpretations comes from their context
and without an ecological view or at least some kind of
relational conceptualization of everything * some kind of *how
is what I think/do/say, wrong? Why is it not instantly
understood?* framework * there will always be misunderstanding,
misinterpretation, etc. I speak in simple terms because I*ve
never really been trained in anything. But theoretical concepts
are all understandable, once you get past the jargon used in
scientific papers and find the right analogy to explain things
to the audience. I give you credit for explaining these things
to the most nit-picky bunch, scientists, who need the world to
fit in their model * have only the language and jargon used that
they expect to find, and subject to the review of the
like-minded for publication in journals to gather a difficult to
attain form of respect and, *You are worth listening to. We
notice you now.* Kenneth Udut
References
Visible links
1.
http://69.195.124.95/%7Enexialor/relational-science/archives/472/comment-page-1#comment-345
