Analysis: Is there a backdoor in Truecrypt? Is Truecrypt a CIA honeypot?

Posted on 14 August, 2010

Truecrypt domain registed with a false address
----------------------------------------------

The domain  name “truecrypt.org”  was originally registered  to a  false address
(“NAVAS  Station,  Antarctica”),  and  was  later  concealed  behind  a  Network
Solutions private registration.

Truecrypt developers identity hidden
------------------------------------

The  TrueCrypt developers  used the  aliases  “ennead” and  “syncon”, but  later
replaced all  references to these aliases  on their website with  “The TrueCrypt
Foundation”  in  2010. The  TrueCrypt  trademark  was  registered in  the  Czech
Republic under name of “David Tesarík”.

Nobody  knows anything  about  the  developers, they  do  not  want to  identify
themselves. Everyone likes  to be known and congratulated for  their great work,
but apparently  not Truecrypt developers, they  do not care about  the glory and
honour and all that comes with it.

Truecrypt developers working for free
-------------------------------------

Closed  source  full  disk  encryption  competitors  like  WinMagic,  DriveCrypt
(Securstar) and  PGP Corporation have  a full  time team of  software developers
working in their products, creating such a product is not an easy feat as any of
them will tell you.

Meanwhile  two unpaid  Truecrypt developers  manage to  work on  Linux, MAC  and
Windows versions, on 32  and 64 versions and support the next  Windows 7 as soon
as  it has  been released,  at the  same time,  presumably, these  two Truecrypt
developers  also hold  full time  jobs that  pays them  a salary  to feed  their
families and covers their mortgages .

Are  closed  source  full  disk encryption  software  developers  overpaid  lazy
bastards and Truecrypt  developers the finest, most hard  working and charitable
software developers on Earth?

Compiling Truecrypt source code increasingly difficult
------------------------------------------------------

Very few  people compile  the Windows  binaries from  source; it  is exceedingly
difficult to generate  binaries from source that match the  binaries provided by
Truecrypt (due to compiler options, etc.)

This would be very convenient for a CIA mole, they are more likely to attack the
software implementation other than the algorithm and  the best way to do that is
to insert  some hard  to find  vulnerability during  packaging. If  someone else
compiled the source code their plan would not work.

Truecrypt license contains distribution restrictions
----------------------------------------------------

Truecrypt is released  under its own “Truecrypt license”, it  is open source but
it contains distribution and  copyright-liability restrictions, most major Linux
distributions  do not  want  to  know anything  about  it,  Fedora has  included
TrueCrypt in its forbidden items list and forked it to RealCrypt instead.

Reference: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems#TrueCrypt

UPDATE 2011: Truecrypt removed from The Amnesic Incognito Live system

The developers of the anonymous live CD  called Tails have now decided to remove
Truecrypt from their distribution claiming that  development is done in a closed
fashion, the licensing is  restrictive and it is not being  reviewed by too many
people.

Reference: https://tails.boum.org/doc/encryption_and_privacy/truecrypt/

Truecrypt open source code has never been reviewed
--------------------------------------------------

Truecrypt’s source code has never been the  subject of a thorough review, nor is
there any reason to rely on the credentials of the developers, since they remain
anonymous.

Good thorough  code review and  testing is  hard, tedious and  painstaking work,
very few people  have the skills to  do it, and Truecrypt  hasn’t been validated
through a comprehensive review by any qualified cryptographer.

Censorship at Truecrypt forums
------------------------------

As  per Truecrypt  forum rule  3  you are  not  allowed to  discuss about  other
encryption software, as  per Truecrypt forum rule 8 you  can’t discuss Truecrypt
forks, as  per Truecrypt forum rule  9 you can’t discuss  software that decrypts
Truecrypt.

You can’t say anything  about their competitors and you are  not even allowed to
say anything about software that decrypts  Truecrypt. If you post any criticisms
or negative comments  about their software, you will find  that those posts will
mysteriously disappear.

Truecrypt forum rules: http://forums.truecrypt.org/viewtopic.php?t=1651

Can the FBI crack Truecrypt?
----------------------------

The CIA would never share their intelligence with their FBI puppies unless it is
a real national  security matter, terrorism, et  al. And they would  not want to
kill the cow that produces their milk in a public trial where their capabilities
are revealed.

Furthermore, there  has been recently a  case of a corrupt  Brazilian banker who
has escaped prosecution after the FBI  failed to break his fully encrypted disk,
he was using Truecrypt.

Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Dantas

Given those news  I do not believe  the FBI can crack Truecrypt  and unless your
name is Bin Laden  you are probably still safe with Truecrypt, even  if it has a
backdoor and the FBI seizes your computer.

Alternatives to Truecrypt forums
--------------------------------

Computer  security  and privacy  newsgroups  such  as alt.privacy.anon-server  ;
alt.security.pgp , alt.privacy and alt.scramdisk

Computer and security internet forums such as Wilders Security Forums.

Alternatives to Truecrypt
-------------------------

The only free full disk encryption open source software that I have found and
can rival Truecrypt is Diskcryptor.

Conclusion about Truecrypt reliability
--------------------------------------

Don’t get paranoid, even if you are using Truecrypt I could as well be wrong on
my analysis and it is highly unlikely the CIA will ever come after you anyway.

Everyone has something to hide, but take it easy, you will need to trust some
encryption product in the end and nobody out there knows 100% sure which one is
safe, because what is safe today might not be tomorrow.

Just use the best encryption product according to your opinion and relax, there
is no point in keeping in your head what could happen to you if you got it
wrong, hopefully you did not, and as long as you did your best research on it,
that is all that is needed.

For the record, I still recommend Truecrypt, they are my second choice of full
disk encryption software after DiskCryptor. I am just raising what I believe are
some fair points, because in security, you TRUST NOBODY.


Source:
http://www.privacylover.com/encryption/analysis-is-there-a-backdoor-in-truecrypt-is-truecrypt-a-cia-honeypot/