Gopher and Web
==============

I read a bbs message from sloum  who made a few days ago a comparison
which I  found quite bright. He  compared the gopherspace to  a quiet
life in  countryside where the  Web would be a  hectic life in  a big
city.

That's clearly  part of what  I feel  attractive with Gopher.  In the
web, you have to manage the rush: a lot of things are happening every
minute and  you just cannot  follow the  tempo. You always  think you
missed something and it is true. The new articles from a week ago can
be difficult to  find on a website which is  often configured to push
new items  in the showcase and  to hide older ones.  For other things
than blogs, you will probably need to use a search engine and to look
quite carefully in the results.

With  Gopher, things  a more  stable and  slow, but  they stay  here,
because it is more static and less dynamic.

No one tries to sell you new  items, so the timeline is just a stable
structure that can  be integrated to the phlog and  helps you to find
the information.

Inside a pubnix community, you have  the benefits of a little village
without the disadvantages: pseudos can preserve your anonymity if you
need it, but the community size  is small enough to preserve from the
impersonal  relationships in  big  towns.  In a  way,  you know  your
virtual neighbors and can speak with them easily.

On  a Mastodon  web instance,  for  example, the  situation is  quite
different. You don't share a lot more  with all the many users of the
instance than the  main public tool to communicate.  You cannot build
or  modify the  common  tools with  them, for  example.  You are  the
clients  of the  server, not  the users.  The sharing  is just  about
communications, not about building things together.

In this pubnix, I was very pleased to find a lot of tools and advices
to use them, which are created and shared by users. People don't just
talk. They try to improve their virtual world.