Today's the Day: Today's the day. It is now "legal" to carry guns in
national parks, providing applicable state rules are observed. And
there's no shortage of hand-wringers predicting the end of the world as
we know it. So perhaps we should spend a moment and review what the new
rule won't do: It won't legalize murder. It won't legalize poaching. It
won't legalize armed robbery, assault with a deadly weapon or
brandishing. It won't legalize destruction of property. It won't
legalize gun possession by "prohibited persons." The "reasoning" used by
those who tell us we cannot allow guns in national parks actually
applies everywhere, and that's where we can demonstrate the flaw in
their argument. An otherwise peaceable armed citizen who gets by just
fine with his guns outside park boundaries won't suddenly undergo a
personality transformation once he crosses a line on a map. And a
criminal, who is not predisposed to obeying rules, won't alter his
behavior one way or another...
http://www.examiner.com/x-1417-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m2d22-What-guns-in-national-parks-rule-change-wont-do
U.S. national parks will open Monday to holders of concealed firearms
[sic] as a hard-fought law passed last year takes effect, but both sides
expect more battles over exactly what the legislation means in practice.
The law - probably the biggest legislative achievement for conservatives
in what was otherwise a year dominated by President Obama's agenda -
says national parks will be governed by the same rules as the states in
which they are located [emphasis added]. That means about 370 of the
country's 392 National Park Service properties will permit visitors to
carry firearms. But the Park Service says exceptions are in place and
that another federal law requires guns to be kept out of federal
facilities. That means firearms are still prohibited at any building
where park employees regularly work, including office buildings,
maintenance sheds and, most contentious of all, visitor centers. "I
think you're going to have people on both sides of the issue test this
in what is or is not a federal facility," said David Barna, a spokesman
for the National Park Service. Gun rights advocates said they are
pleased that weapons will no longer be off limits but that the Park
Service should not poke exemptions into the law. "That's ludicrous.
You're going to tell someone if they have a concealed weapon permit they
can't go into the visitor center to use the restroom?" said Rep. Rob
Bishop, Utah Republican. "If they come up with restrictive exemptions,
what they're asking for is a lawsuit to try and stop implementation of
what Congress clearly told them to do." The new rules, for example,
prohibit concealed firearms on tours of the caves at Carlsbad Caverns,
because it's a location where park employees regularly work... Mr.
Barna, the Park Service spokesman, said his agency doesn't expect any
problems from the new law... Mr. Barna said gun owners, particularly
those who carry their firearms, tend to be knowledgeable about state and
local laws. He said parks are updating their Web pages to explain what
is or isn't allowed, and will post signs at the buildings that are still
off limits to firearms. (The press continues to confuse the earlier
attempt to change the NPS regulation with the Coburn Amendment. The
former was limited to concealed handguns, the latter is not. As I
understand it, Carlsbad Caverns would be off limits anyway because New
Mexico prohibits firearms in state parks.)
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/22/national-parks-will-open-gates-to-holders-of-conce/
---
The NRA Election: I regard my NRA membership much as I regard my US
citizenship - I have many beefs with the government and the NRA
"leadership" but I am not about to renounce my citizenship nor resign
from the NRA. Elections of NRA board members are usually a confusing
matter for most members who are eligible to receive ballots, in part
because no candidate is ever going to list his "warts." For example,
former Texas Ranger Joaquin Jackson is not about to tell you that he put
his foot in it a few years back with a statement that private citizens
have no business owning autoloading rifles with a magazine capacity
greater than five rounds. Jeff Knox, of The Firearms Coalition, offers
his views and recommendations. Even if you do not agree with all of his
endorsements or you wish to vote for additional candidates, take note of
his recommendation not to use all 25 of your votes if you have no
specific reason to do so. The NRA needs a board with minds of its own,
not a rubber-stamp to its paid bureaucrats.
http://firearmscoalition.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=502:nra-board-elections-2010&catid=19:the-knox-update&Itemid=144
---
Poll - Utahns Support Defensive Display: As gun rights bills flow
through the Legislature, a new poll shows Utahns support gun owners
displaying their weapons if they feel threatened. Sixty-five percent of
respondents favor HB78, according to a Deseret News/KSL-TV poll
conducted by Dan Jones & Associates, while 30 percent oppose the idea.
The poll has a margin of error of 5 percent. The survey of 410 Utahns
also revealed that more educated and wealthier respondents were less
likely to support the proposal. Mirroring legislative debates, 70
percent of Republicans favored the bill while 56 percent of Democrats
indicated support. HB78, which is waiting for Senate approval, would
allow concealed weapon permit holders to "flash" their gun or tell
someone that they are carrying a weapon... The current HB78 is a
toned-down version of the original proposal, which caused controversy
with its broad language. When introduced, the legislation would have
allowed a gun owner to openly carry a gun and, in self-defense, draw the
weapon and threaten "deadly force." Supporters said the bill simply
clarified existing rights, but in the end, the most controversial
language was removed. Gun rights advocates as well as state prosecutors
have hailed the proposal as a much-needed clarification...
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700010737/Utah-Legislature-Flashing-of-guns-has-broad-support.html
---
Big Brother, Nevada Style: The Nevada State Special Session of the
Legislature meets this week on Tuesday. They are looking for ways to
fill the budget deficit and don't think they have overlooked the cash
that has been spent on guns and ammo in the last year. This message is
urgent and we need your action immediately. The legislature is
considering a means of "revenue enhancement" that would make privacy for
CCW holders a huge problem. This is the exact same bill that was
rejected by the legislature last year. InsureNet is lobbying for this
bill so they can install 1,000's of camera or "scanners" on nearly all
of Nevada's public roads. If it passes it would allow InsureNet, to
photograph/scan every license plate on our roads. This data would be
scanned and analyzed by InsureNet for the purpose of catching uninsured
motorists. It's a nice premise but it comes with some serious problems.
The problem is, in Nevada, every CCW holder has essentially given up
his/her right to privacy. The minute you ask the government for
"permission" to lawfully carry concealed, your license plate and vehicle
registration is noted as a CCW holder. In other words, those who have
jumped through the hoops of paying for the privilege to carry a lawful
firearm--these lawful gun owners would be captured by an unaccountable,
out of state corporate entities database! We constantly hear of
databases being hacked. Do you understand the ramifications of this
bill? Can you see the possibility for misuse? Gun owners did not create
the spending problem at the state level. And gun owners should not have
to fear privacy violations by an out-of-state corporation just because
of being a CCW holder... (In case you didn't know, most, if not all,
photo radar cameras are "on" full time, relaying license-plate numbers
and location to a nationwide database.)
http://gonv.org/Alerts2010SpecialSession.htm
---
Oregon Group Appears to Be Trojan Horse: ...The new bill was rammed
through committee with only one hour's notice. That appears to have been
deliberate, meaning in order to discourage public input. And while
Oregon Firearms Federation testified in opposition, and also delivered
opposition testimony on behalf of NRA, one gun group that supported the
measure carried the day: Oregon Gun Owners. Who? "Long time [OFF]
members may recall that "Oregon Gun Owners" was the group that drafted
legislation to outlaw private transfers of firearms at gun shows and in
some cases your own home. When OFF defeated that bill in 1999, "Oregon
Gun Owners" attempted to put a measure on the ballot to outlaw private
firearms transfers at gun shows. That failed as well, but a competing
measure sponsored by Ginny Burdick passed. "Oregon Gun Owners" once
attempted to hijack OFF's domain names until threatened with legal
action. We can only speculate as to why OGO has come out of the
woodwork to promote another anti-gun bill. They played NO part in the
bill they are seeking to overturn and had no position on the basic issue
of whether Oregon gun laws should make any sense. What they HAVE done is
give cover to the anti-gun politicians who can now say that a 'gun
group' supports overturning the progress we made with your help last
year." ...That certainly deserves further scrutiny. Three questions come
to mind: Are the criticisms true? What is OGO's rationale for supporting
SB 1064? Why would Oregon politicians defer to them when NRA and OFF
oppose a bill? I'll be happy to give Oregon Gun Owners space in a future
column to explain their position on the bill, and to address anything
I've presented here they may consider unfair, out of context or
misrepresenting.
http://www.examiner.com/x-1417-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m2d20-Is-gun-group-giving-cover-for-Oregon-gun-control
---
CHL Privacy Thwarted in Arkansas: One year ago, gun owners in Arkansas
were in an uproar. On February 16 of 2009, Arkansas Times blogger Max
Brantley viciously posted the list of Concealed Handgun License holders
in Arkansas on his web page, causing a backlash which will last until
CHL holders receive full privacy of the list. In the days which
followed, a bill was filed by Representative Randy Stewart, a Democrat
from Kirby, which would completely privatize the CHL list. This bill was
put on the fast track; on March 6th it was passed by the House on a vote
of 98-1, with only Lindsley Smith of Fayetteville voting no. This vote
margin was a mirror of the outrage from Arkansans all over the state.
The bill was then sent to the Senate for approval by the State Agencies
& Governmental Affairs committee. It was expected to move swiftly
through this committee to the Senate floor for obvious approval.
However, forces were at work to stop the bill (as written) dead... It's
obvious now the shenanigans of Senators Wilkinson and Hendren caused the
CHL privacy bill to be amended and watered down. However, it wasn't so
clear to gun owners Senator Gilbert Baker could have easily voted the
original bill through to the Senate, where it was sure to pass. Senator
Gilbert Baker is now running for the United States Senate seat held by
Senator Blanche Lincoln. After watching the politics of Senator Mark
Pryor this past year, I am not sure we need another politician playing
games with our trust on gun votes. We definitely do not need another
politician in Washington, D.C. forcing laws on us we do not want.
http://www.examiner.com/x-33857-Fort-Smith-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m2d21-Arkansas-CHL-privacy-law-one-year-later?cid=exrss-Fort-Smith-Gun-Rights-Examiner
---
Open-Carry Demonstration in Wisconsin: Clutching cups of coffee and
chatting in loose groups, the people outside Starbucks on Sunday didn't
look particularly unusual, save for the holstered guns strapped to
nearly everyone's hip or thigh. The display of Smith & Wessons, Glocks
and Kel-Tec pistols among lattes and coffeecake was part of an organized
rally to spread awareness about Wisconsin's open carry law as well as
the recent treatment of a Sussex gun carrier by local law enforcement.
Participants later drove to the Wisconsin State Patrol District
Headquarters in Waukesha and demonstrated on the front lawn. The turnout
- about 40 people from various parts of Wisconsin and Illinois - may
indicate growing support for the expansion of gun rights in the state,
and in particular, legislation that could make it possible for people to
carry concealed weapons. State law allows adults to openly carry guns,
but not in businesses that ask them not to, places that serve alcohol,
and not in school zones or public buildings. Last spring, Attorney
General J.B. Van Hollen re-affirmed in a brief the right of Wisconsin's
residents to bear arms openly, saying that those who do so should not be
subject to disorderly conduct tickets from local law enforcement...
http://www.jsonline.com/news/waukesha/84928722.html
---
Washington Man Turns to Open Carry: Duncan Dohmen wants people to notice
the pistol he carries. He isn't a police officer and tells people that
when he's asked. He likes these chances to educate people about a right
afforded them 219 years ago - a right he fears could be stripped.
"Rights not exercised are rights lost," said the 68-year-old resident of
Covington in King County. "... I was walking around for 18 years with a
pistol secretly concealed and it alarmed nobody. Then I realized that
(openly) carrying a pistol might cause questions." So for the past two
years Dohmen has openly worn his Smith & Wesson 1911 model .45-caliber
semiautomatic pistol. He's an active member of the Open Carry movement
and takes any chance he gets to talk about the right to bear arms under
both the U.S. and Washington constitutions. Dohmen said he's found most
people willing to listen - until last June, when a restroom break at a
Prosser restaurant ended up in a criminal charge... (I have been
certified to "advanced trainer" level in weapon retention and that
shoulder holster is not one I'd want to be wearing if someone attempted
to disarm me.)
http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2010/02/21/910419/unconcealed-gun-causes-stir-in.html
---
Demonstrators Compete Outside Philadelphia Gun Shop: Perhaps emboldened
by its headway in protests against the old Colosimo's Gun Center, an
interfaith group rallied yesterday against a new target - the Shooter
Shop in Kensington. This time, though, the demonstrators ran into an
opposing force: a contingent of pro-gun counterprotesters. It all added
up to a lively demonstration of the First Amendment and a quarrel over
the Second Amendment as the sides each mustered about 40 protesters
outside the gun shop, on Allegheny Avenue. When the antigun advocates
from Heeding God's Call went into silent prayer, the pro-gun folks sang
"God Bless America." When the antigun folks sang a hymn, an opponent
shouted, "Long live the Second Amendment." The Rev. Fred Kauffman, a
Mennonite pastor and leader of Heeding God's Call, told his faithful
that gun dealers such as the Shooter Shop could do much more to make
sure they are "not feeding the illegal gun market." Kauffman and his
band are urging gun shops to sign a 10-point pledge calling for shops to
be more vigilant in spotting "straw purchasers" who buy guns in bulk for
resale to criminals... (Firearm dealers are already required to report
multiple handgun purchases and are scrutinized by F Troop in regard to
straw purchases.)
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/84877172.html
---
Spreading the Manure: The Arizona Senate has approved a provision that
would make it illegal to sell a weapon at a gun show without verifying
that the purchaser is an American citizen. Senators approved the measure
in a 15-14 vote on Thursday. Their vote attaches the provision to
another bill that would allow people to carry a concealed weapon without
a permit. The amendment was sponsored by Phoenix Democrat Ken Cheuvront
(shev RONT). Cheuvront says the amendment is designed to cut down on the
number of guns bought in the United States and sold in Mexico. Mesa
Republican Sen. Russell Pearce says Cheuvront has a worthy goal. But
Pearce opposed attaching the provision to his bill allowing people to
carry concealed guns without permits. Senators still must give the bill
formal approval. (That's pretty poor journalism, not checking to see if
US citizenship is actually required to purchase a firearm lawfully. It
is also legal for permanent resident aliens to purchase firearms and to
obtain CWP's in Arizona, a fact that is reflected neither in the
misguided amendment to the constitutional-carry bill nor the article.)
http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2010/02/18/20100218gun-shows-bill-citizenship.html
---
California Publication Touts Top Brady Rank: Once again, California
holds the top spot with the nation�s strongest gun laws that help combat
the illegal gun market, prevent the sale of guns without background
checks and reduce risks to children, according to the Brady Campaign to
Prevent Gun Violence. In the organization�s 2009 state scorecards
released today for all 50 states, California earned 79 points out of a
total of 100. This past year, California further strengthened its laws
by passing legislation to regulate the sale of handgun ammunition in the
state. Governor Schwarzenegger signed AB 962, sponsored by Assembly
Member Kevin DeLeon (D-Los Angeles) last fall. It was the top priority
of the California Brady Campaign Chapters and Women Against Gun
Violence. "This important new law will help keep handgun ammunition out
of the hands of dangerous people and give law enforcement an important
new tool to track down armed criminals in possession of illegal guns and
bullets," said Ellen Boneparth, spokesperson for the California Brady
Campaign Chapters...
http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/view/142526
.. The campaign graded the 50 states on their gun laws and found that
four of five states scored less than 25 points out of 100 possible. West
Virginia, for example, scored a 4. California scored the highest, a 79.
But the correlation between what gun-control advocates want in law - and
what public safety results from that law - is unclear at best. According
to FBI statistics from 2008, West Virginia's homicide rate is 3.03
killings per 100,000 people. California's rate is 5.83 homicides per
100,000 people. While 60 percent of the killings in West Virginia are
gun-related, 69 percent are gun-related in California. North Dakota has
the nation's lowest homicide rate, with only 0.47 killings per 100,000
people. None of its three homicides in 2008 were gun related. North
Dakota, like West Virginia, scored only a 4 on the Brady scorecard of
"good" gun laws. Utah scored a zero on the Brady scorecard, but had only
1.5 homicides per 100,000 people - and only 46 percent were gun-related.
Now, many states with low scores on gun control had higher homicide
rates than California, and higher percentages of gun-related homicides.
But with the exception of Hawaii, the seven states with fewer than two
homicides per 100,000 people all scored 10 or less on the Brady scorecard...
http://www.dailymail.com/Opinion/Editorials/201002210395
Since its inception as the National Council to Control Handguns over 30
years ago, the Brady Campaign has premised its entire agenda on the
notion that having more gun control laws and, therefore, fewer guns,
means that crime must necessarily decrease. History has not been kind to
the group's delusion, however. In recent decades, the severity of gun
control laws has been diminished at the federal, state and local levels,
the number of guns has increased by over four million a year on average,
and today, the nation's murder and total violent crime rates are at
45-year and 35-year lows, respectively... Brady came out with its 2010
"grades" this week, and once again we'll take them as seriously as they
deserve. With the nation's murder rate having been cut in half since
1991, as Brady's agenda has been dismantled or rejected by Congress and
one state legislature after another, and the numbers of guns, gun
owners, Right-to-Carry states, and carry permit holders have risen to
all-time highs with no end in sight...
http://www.ammoland.com/2010/02/20/anti-freedom-brady-campaign-to-act-stupid/
---
Old Case, New Evidence: A possible new piece of evidence is raising
questions in the murder case against Oklahoma City pharmacist Jerome
Ersland. A security guard found a shell casing from a 22 caliber bullet
at the Reliable Pharmacy almost three months after the incident, but
some are debating how it got there. The shell casing could have come
from anywhere, defense attorney Irven Box. It may have been in the
pharmacy the entire time but was missed by police, Box said. The shell
casing could be significant because it could prove that Jerome Ersland
was shot at by one of the suspects, something he's alleged from the
beginning. Ersland has said the suspects who entered the Reliable
Pharmacy shot at him first and that's why he returned fire, ultimately
killing 16-year-old Antwun Parker. District Attorney David Prater said
surveillance video at the time of the shooting proves the suspects never
had a chance to get a shot off. Prater said the new evidence is
supicious and could have been planted. "Two and half months after the
shooting, after Oklahoma City police swept the pharmacy, the fact that a
shell casing was found in the back of the store is very suspicious to
me," Prater said. But Ersland's attorney said it's too early to be
pointing fingers...
http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=12020722
---
Cavalry Arms Cops a Plea: A Gilbert [AZ] firearms manufacturer will
cease its gun operations after the company's owner pleaded guilty to
illegally selling rifles, shotguns and handguns. Cavalry Arms Corp. says
on its Web site that it has been "engaged in an ongoing dispute" with
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, or ATF, for two
years over "regulatory and compliance mistakes." But in federal court
last week, owner Shawn Nealon admitted that he and his company illegally
sold as many as 40 weapons to an out-of state buyer, and he voluntarily
surrendered his federal firearms licenses, meaning Cavalry will no
longer be able to import, manufacture or deal in weapons or
ammunition... Nealon's lawyer, Mark Vincent of Chandler, called the
charges against his client ridiculous. "This is by no means a great
victory for the government," he said, describing federal gun regulations
as arcane. "In my opinion, no gun dealer in the United States could
comply with the myriad of regulations. . . . It's almost impossible to
determine what the law is." Vincent said as much as 90 percent of the
government's original case against Cavalry was dismissed, leaving his
client pleading guilty to selling to an out-of-state buyer. "It's a
minor problem. . . . If that had been the only (charge), I don't know
that they would have bothered with it," he said, adding: "Nobody was
hurt. Nobody was almost hurt." Nealon faces up to five years in prison
and a $250,000 fine when he is sentenced in April. But authorities say
the bigger victory in this case is stripping Nealon of his firearms
license... (Recall that I have recently shared articles about a couple
of California residents who were charged for claiming Arizona residency
in order to purchase firearms in Arizona that they are not allowed to
purchase in California.)
http://www.azcentral.com/community/gilbert/articles/2010/02/22/20100222guns-gilbert.html
---
Rule One, Two, Three Reminder: The message was a happy one. But Kevin
Wilkins would never get it. The Atlantic City police officer and his
fiancee, Nichole Gupton, had been trying for almost a year to buy a
house. On Thursday, real estate agent Bobby Cress called around noon to
let Wilkins know the dream home would be theirs. "Hey Kev, great news,"
she said. "You got your written commitment. Call me when you get up."
But Wilkins, 31, would never call. The two-year veteran had died hours
earlier after accidentally discharging his weapon while inside his
patrol car near Stanley Holmes Village. He was trying to put a rubber
sleeve on the grip of the .40-caliber Glock semiautomatic handgun when a
bullet - still in the chamber after he removed the magazine from the gun
- struck him in the face. An autopsy Friday confirmed the death was
accidental, Chief John Mooney said. The full report has not yet been
released... (The Rules:
http://www.spw-duf.info/safety.html. In this
case, I suspect it may have been the thumb, not the trigger finger, that
wandered into the trigger guard.)
http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/news/top_three/article_6335b460-1d90-11df-8c7a-001cc4c03286.html
With Friends Like These...: A gun safety class attendee in Orlando,
Fla., was accidentally shot in the foot by his instructor, police
reported. Robert Frauman Jr., 50, was one of three students at a
concealed weapons certification class at Summit Church Saturday, when he
was struck by the stray bullet, a church spokeswoman told the Orlando
Sentinel, adding he was "doing well" and the bullet did not hit any
bones. Instructor Michael Phillips could not be reached for comment, the
Sentinel said, but another National Rifle Association instructor told
the newspaper it is forbidden to take ammunition to classes. The event
was not sponsored by the church, which offered one of its meeting rooms
to the group after some of its members made a request, the spokeswoman
said. "We won't be having anything like that in our church in the
future," she added.
http://www.officialwire.com/main.php?action=posted_news&rid=100478
---
Marines to Use SOCOM Round in Afghanistan: The Marine Corps is dropping
its conventional 5.56mm ammunition in Afghanistan in favor of new
deadlier, more accurate rifle rounds, and could field them at any time.
The open-tipped rounds until now have been available only to Special
Operations Command troops. The first 200,000 5.56mm Special Operations
Science and Technology rounds are already downrange with Marine
Expeditionary Brigade-Afghanistan, said Brig. Gen. Michael Brogan,
commander of Marine Corps Systems Command. Commonly known as "SOST"
rounds, they were legally cleared for Marine use by the Pentagon in late
January, according to Navy Department documents obtained by Marine Corps
Times. SOCom developed the new rounds for use with the Special
Operations Force Combat Assault Rifle, or SCAR, which needed a more
accurate bullet because its short barrel, at 13.8 inches, is less than
an inch shorter than the M4 carbine's. Using an open-tip match round
design common with some sniper ammunition, SOST rounds are designed to
be "barrier blind," meaning they stay on target better than existing
M855 rounds after penetrating windshields, car doors and other objects.
Compared to the M855, SOST rounds also stay on target longer in open air
and have increased stopping power through "consistent, rapid
fragmentation which shortens the time required to cause incapacitation
of enemy combatants," according to Navy Department documents. At 62
grains, they weigh about the same as most NATO rounds, have a typical
lead core with a solid copper shank and are considered a variation of
Federal Cartridge Co.'s Federal Trophy Bonded Bear Claw round, which was
developed for big-game hunting and is touted in a company news release
for its ability to crush bone...
http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2010/02/marine_SOST_ammo_021510w/
---
Tangentially Related: Americans who turn to terrorism and plot against
the U.S. are now as big a concern as international terrorists, Homeland
Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Sunday... In the last year,
Napolitano said, she's witnessed a movement from international extremism
to domestic extremism - cases in which Americans radicalized and decided
to plot attacks against the country. "What really is it that draws a
young person being raised in the United States to want to go and be at a
camp in Yemen and then come back to the United States with the idea of
committing harm within the United States?" Napolitano asked without
citing specific cases. "Where in that person's formulation is there an
opportunity to break that cycle?" ... John Brennan, President Barack
Obama's homeland security adviser, echoed Napolitano's concerns about
violent extremism Sunday... Brennan pointed to a case from late last
year when five young Pakistani men living in Northern Virginia traveled
to Pakistan seeking training from al-Qaida... (Are they feeling some
heat? It's a relief not to see recent veterans, RKBA activists, Ron Paul
supporters, anti-abortion activists, etc. lumped in with homegrown
jihadists.)
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/61681
--
Stephen P. Wenger, KE7QBY
Firearm safety - It's a matter
for education, not legislation.
The tactics and skills to use a firearm
in self-defense don't come naturally
with the right to keep and bear arms.
http://www.spw-duf.info
