CLIPPINGS
=========
Just stuff I've clipped off of the internet for a few years,
definitely not necessarily my opinions...
----------------------------------------
Where popular instinct works untrammelled the old and violent
passionate antagonism between the Russian and the Jew survives. You
see it in the hotch potch of the Ukraine, the inhabitants of which,
in spite of all theories, are of Russian race and tradition, and
the central town of which is the sacred region of Russia as a
member of Christendom. The Jews - page 195
----------------------------------------
The System has not changed - it is simply emboldened by the
docility of the taxpayers and voters. Democracies always end this
way because they are like public conveniences - everyone gets to
use them and many simply foul them. A population that neither reads
books nor listens to spoken argument but wallows in video imagery
is defeated.
----------------------------------------
SheepmanOvis 20/04/2022
A Prediction: (making predictions is very stupid. I am not about
to walk over to William Hill)
The war ends in Autumn 2023. It is the prospect of a second Winter
with restricted energy and no end in sight that brings this to a
head.
Where things are now: Western strategy has been to draw the
Russians into an insurgency in western Ukraine, and escalate beyond
Russia's ability to fight by pitching in Poland, advancing to the
Russian border through Finnish membership, while doing as much
damage as possible to the Russian economy by hitting the financial
sector. Part of this has been pumping arms into western Ukraine
(for the putative insurgents), and bigging up Lvov as a possible
centre for the Kiev regime (images of Festung Lviv).
But that strategy has clearly failed. The Russians have no
intention of going into western Ukraine with boots on the ground,
and it's clear they can't be drawn in. So no insurgency as the
Russians aren't there. Heavy weapons can't be transported to the
eastern front, as the Russians are just destroying them in
transit. Destruction of roads and bridges to prevent supply of
weapon is creating a de facto border and partition.
In this context, Odessa takes on a new significance, because it is
about the only major city that is securely in Kiev government/NATO
hands which the Russians might credibly want. It's firmly enough in
their hands that NATO forces can get directly involved without
risking another Azovstal style fiasco. So, Odessa becomes the new
Lviv strategically - a place that can be fortified to bleed the
Russians. Might that have something to do with the sinking of the
Moskva outside Odessa?
Where things are going: Every attempt will be made to goad the
Russians westwards. Nothing will work. For example, I imagine DoD
biolabs might well be established in Finland. But there's more than
one way to knock out a lab - it doesn't take soldiers or a great
big Kalibr missile. Finnish antivivisectionists might just get a
bit more, well, bolshy.
This drags out over months, with Ukrainian forces being sent out
against the Russians and getting killed piecemeal, and western
Ukraine getting hit with missile strikes as attempts are made to
supply the Ukrainian forces.
The troops in Odessa wait for their moment, but nothing happens.
We go into Winter, with considerable but not insufferable
privations in western Europe (restricted use of power, increased
cost of food). North America can supply western Europe with grain,
but the loss of Ukrainian grain will be felt elsewhere in the world
- cue more migration.
But I don't see the first Winter as fatal to the West. Bojo and
chums can play Churchill and make us all pull together, promising
victory in the Spring. 'Just a few more cold showers to flatten the
Putin.' SPIB will do its work. Mass formation will hold things
together, plus sufficient energy stockpiles to prevent things from
getting really dire.
How it ends: The problem is that Spring does not bring victory,
and nor does the Summer. At some point, people in western and
central Ukraine get a bit tired of being rounded up and sent east
as cannon fodder, and question whether Zelensky is really their
geezer after all. Remnant Ukraine falls apart.
People in western Europe start to get a bit fractious about the
whole idea of another Winter like the last, as their economy goes
to Hell.
Whether it ends with Zelensky having to flee his own people, or
with some other catalyst, it's the prospect of the second Winter
that spells defeat for the State Department.
The West can disguise its withdrawal to some extent by pretending
it was never directly engaged. The Russians walk into Odessa, if
they want to, without a shot being fired.
What remains of Ukraine becomes a UN-administered basket case if
the West can be bothered to remain engaged or, more likely, a
buffer state under Russian tutelage. (Polish annexation makes more
sense historically. But D-rate Western aligned states just don't
get to make big territorial acquisitions. That's naughty, and looks
a bit old-fashioned).
----------------------------------------
Let me present to you a thought, if the world is to have a future,
the western sphere must be defeated, in short Russia must win.
----------------------------------------
"it will be attributed to climate change"
This is the essence of the Empire of Lies in which we now
live. Elites generally have lies that they use or live by, but our
current elites are particularly disconnected from the nations they
should be part of, and particularly endemically dishonest because
they are ideologically motivated rather than pragmatic and
conservative. They lie routinely and systematically, about
everything, to twist it to serve their ideologies, their agendas,
and their power and wealth.
Yet some sceptics will try to argue that yes, they lie about all
those things - covid, climate change, BLM, "gender" and identity
politics, but we should still believe everything they tell us about
Russia and the Ukraine, and all those fairy stories they've told us
over the years to instil hatred and fear of Russia. All those
bizarre and absurdly unlikely stories about people who just happen
to be their chosen enemies apparently choosing to engage in
ridiculously self-harming comic-book villain crimes. Targeting of
individuals which poisonous substances when just shooting them
would be so much easier and infinitely less costly in PR
terms. Supposed uses of chemical weapons that are utterly
pointless, when they are winning anyway and have nothing possible
to gain from doing so that would come remotely close to the
costs. Fantasies about supposed manipulative interventions in our
elections that just happen to implicate the political enemies of
the aforementioned elites.
This problem is the one that will take us over the cliff edge of
societal collapse. This problem is the one we should be addressing
urgently, to the exclusion of all others.
Not the problems between foreigners that the elites are so busy
screaming at us to look at, instead of their own depredations, and
so busy using to justify more money and powers funneled into their
own hands.
----------------------------------------
Economic dependency works both ways
Western warmongers are right, when they say that a World War is
impossible with the economic interdependencies between Europe and
Russia. But these dependences work both ways; it is precisely the
Russian dependency on European markets and Western financial
systems that prevented Russia from acting in Ukraine in
2014. Western sanctions have forced Russia to free itself from
these dependencies giving her a free hand to wage war in the
Ukraine. From a military point of view, Russia should have launched
"Operation Z" in 2014, when they could have simply walked into
Ukraine without meeting any resistance.
For decades the US has fought against "European energy dependency
on Russia". This dependency has prevented American aggression on
Russia from European soil and has forced the US to find other
fronts for its war on Russia and China. For the European people
this dependency has guaranteed peace. Now the US wants Europe to
sacrifice peace and its economy. Warmongers want war on Russia to
the last Euro!
Germany's preparations for a third world war in full swing - Peter
Schwarz, WSWS, May 4, 2022
"The waging of a Third World War is not just a military issue," he
proclaims. It is "first and foremost an economic issue. For without
economic disentanglement along the power and military blocs,
effective warfare that can be sustained over a longer period is
impossible, as we can already see from Germany's dependence on
Russian natural gas."
"Whoever wants to make world warfare manageable must first
unbundle world trade," Steingart emphasises. "Economic independence
is more important than billions more for the Bundeswehr. So, it is
not only the soldiers and their military equipment that must be
gathered into an offensive formation, but also economic resources."
"Viewed with this economic eye," he then states, "the preparations
for making a Third World War manageable are in full swing."
Posted by: Petri Krohn | May 5 2022 17:34 utc
----------------------------------------
"Because it is our fathers, brothers, husbands and sons who
represent us at the ballot box. Our fathers and our brothers love
us; our husbands are our choice, and one with us; our sons are what
WE MAKE THEM. We are content that they represent us, in the
cornfield, on the battlefield and at the ballot box, and we THEM in
the schoolroom, at the fireside, and at the cradle, believing our
representation even at the ballot box to be thus more full and
impartial than it would be were the views of the few who wish
suffrage adopted, contrary to the judgement of the many."
----------------------------------------
I signed that, too, but I have to concur with the Why referendum?
remark as I'm a firm believer in Bismarck's Vox populi, vox
Rindvieh.
----------------------------------------
A malapropism of vox populi, vox dei, The Voice of the people is
the voice of God. Literally, Rindvieh means cattle. It's really a
pleonasm, because both Rinder and Vieh already mean that. It's
usually used to refer to a stupid person in a somewhat affectionate
way. An English transliteration of the phrase could be something
like If you ask a million oxen for their opinion on anything, the
outcome will be a loud mooing.
----------------------------------------
Rede des Koenigs vor der Schlacht bei Leuthen (3. Dezember 1757)
Der Koenig hatte alle Generals und Commandeurs nach Tafel zu sich
in sein Quartier bestellt, und hier war es, wo er ihnen mit
traurigem Ernst und zuweilen mit einer Thraene im Auge sagte:
"Meine Herren! Ich habe Sie hierher kommen lassen, um Ihnen
erstlich fuer die treuen Dienste, die Sie zeither dem Vaterlande
und mir geleistet haben, zu danken. Ich erkenne sie mit dem
geruehrtesten Gefuehl. Es ist beinahe keiner unter Ihnen, der sich
nicht durch eine grosse und ehrebringende Handlung ausgezeichnet
haette. Mich auf Ihren Muth und Erfahrung verlassend, habe ich den
Plan zur Bataille gemacht, die ich morgen2 liefern werde und
liefern muss. Ich werde gegen alle Regeln der Kunst einen beinahe
zweimal staerkern, auf Anhoehen verschanzt stehenden Feind
angreifen. Ich muss es thun, oder es ist alles verloren. Wir
muessen den Feind schlagen oder uns vor ihren Batterien alle
begraben lassen. So denk ich, so werde ich auch handeln. Ist einer
oder der andere unter Ihnen, der nicht so denkt, der fordere hier
auf der Stelle seinen Abschied. Ich werde ihm selbigen ohne den
geringsten Vorwurf geben."
Hier folgte eine Pause von Seiten des Redners, und eine heilige
Stille von Seiten der Zuhoerer; nur durch mit Muehe
zurueckgehaltene, der Ehrfurcht und der heiligsten Vaterlandsliebe
geweinte Thraenen unterbrochen3. Darauf erhob der koenigliche
Sprecher seine Stimme wieder und fuhr mit freundlich-laechelndem
Gesicht fort:
----------------------------------------
"Ich habe vermuthet, dass mich keiner von Ihnen verlassen wuerde;
ich rechne nun also ganz auf Ihre treue Huelfe und auf den gewissen
Sieg. Sollt' ich bleiben und Sie nicht fuer das, was Sie morgen1
thun werden, belohnen koennen, so wird es unser Vaterland
thun. Gehen Sie nun ins Lager, und sagen Sie das, was ich Ihnen
hier gesagt habe, Ihren Regimentern, und versichern Sie ihnen
dabei, ich wuerde ein jedes genau bemerken. Das
Cavallerie-Regiment, was nicht gleich, wenn es befohlen wird, sich
a corps perdu in den Feind hineinstuerzt, lass ich gleich nach der
Bataille absitzen und mach' es zu einem Garnison-Regiment. Das
Bataillon Infanterie, was, es treffe auch, worauf es wolle, nur zu
stocken anfaengt, verliert die Fahnen und die Saebels, und ich lass
ihnen die Borten von der Montirung schneiden. Nun leben Sie wohl,
meine Herren, morgen1 um diese Zeit haben wir den Feind geschlagen,
oder wir sehen uns nie wieder."
----------------------------------------
Critics and authors, who congregate in large cities, and see
nothing of the world but a sort of phantasmagoria, to whom the
numberless characters they meet in the course of a few hours are
fugitive "as the flies of a summer," evanescent as the figures in a
camera obscura, may talk very learnedly, and attribute the motions
of the puppets to circumstances of which they are confessedly in
total ignorance. They see character only in the bust, and have not
room (for the crowd) to study it as a whole length, that is, as it
exists in reality. But those who trace things to their source, and
proceed from individuals to generals, know better. School-boys, for
example, who are early let into the secret, and see the seeds
growing, are not only sound judges, but true prophets of character;
so that the nick-names they give their playfellows usually stick by
them ever after. The gossips in country-towns, also, who study
human nature, not merely in the history of the individual, but in
the genealogy of the race, know the comparative anatomy of the
minds of a whole neighbourhood to a tittle, where to look for marks
and defects-- explain a vulgarity by a cross in the breed, or a
foppish air in a young tradesman by his grandmother's marriage with
a dancing-master, and are the only practical conjurors and expert
decypherers of the determinate lines of true or supposititious
character.
----------------------------------------
I'm not a racist, I just prefer 'cultural comfort'. I find millions
of foreigners moving here most disconcerting, black or white.
----------------------------------------
The drums of war are growing louder and louder, and the psychopaths
who feed off it are growing more and more aroused. Let's hope this
evil empire ends as soon as possible in as peaceful a manner as
possible, before these freaks get us all killed.
----------------------------------------
Barry Sheridan 25/08/22
Suggesting, as Professor Sean McMeekin apparently does, that
President Putin is the epitome of evil is wholly unjust. Vladimir
Putin is first and foremost a Russian patriot whose core effort has
been devoted to ressurecting his country from the ruin left by the
collapse of communism. To do so has not been easy, involving him in
many complicated and arcane manoeuvring against many operators who
wanted to continue the looting of Russia for their own ends. Yes,
it has not been a path towards democracy, but those who have
opposed President Putin's ambitions are not figures of sweetness
light and reason and have little interest in the supposed fixations
of the west.
The last two decades have seen a significant recovery in Russia's
fortunes, including a rebuilding of national confidence so
necessary to success. It was a drive that offered, and President
Putin would have accepted the chance, for a permanent burying of
the ideological animosities and divisions that sustained the Cold
War. However the west had no such inclinations, the promises of
former US Secretary of State, James Baker, were discarded, and NATO
became the expansionist arm of global ambitions whose intention is
to impose on humanity, total western hegemony. To do so, a self
selected small group of politically powerful and wealthy people are
quite willing to destroy any country that gets in the way,
including their own. Even the reluctant should see this as obvious
as Europe and elsewhere crumbles into penury.
For years the tools at the hands of the State have conditioned
western peoples to fear one thing and then another until Covid came
along, an epidemic little worse than a bad flu, but one that proved
enough to crush centuries of belief in hard won rights. The
confidence this gave to those with globalist ambitions that this
was the moment to go for broke and impose their dominance over
humanity was struck. The overture to that end is the war in
Ukraine. Unfortunately they had not been paying attention to a
Russia largely rebuilt by a President it frames as everything he is
not. Despite his innate caution, Vladimir Putin has read his nation
correctly, it is the west led by those pretending to be leaders who
have misjudged. The world, and especially the western peoples are
going to pay a huge price for having failed to stand up this
reckless gambit.
----------------------------------------
02/09/22 It's worth pointing out that while you and I and everyone
else are being told by de Pfeffel and the rest of the Soprano
mobsters in Westminster that the economic catastrophe that is
emerging is because of Putin's 'brutal and illegal' invasion of our
hitherto unknown longest-standing-best-friend-and-ally-ever,
(which, incidentally, is the most corrupt country in Europe, the
tenth most corrupt in the world and which most Brits could never
have accurately pinpointed on a world map until recently) he, de
Pfeffel told Zelnsky not to negotiate peace terms with the Russians
back in February.
If de Pfeffel had not done this, Russia would have ceased
hostilities, tens of thousands of sons, brothers, fathers, cousins
and neighbours would not have been slaughtered, cheap gas and oil
supplies would have continued flowing into Europe and Britain stood
a chance of emerging from de Pfeffel's catastrophic covid policy.
But no, not only has this weak, useless, lying, philandering,
corrupt pos directly caused large loss of life abroad, he has
brought about financial ruin, suicide and likely death from cold
and lack of food at home. He, along with all the others from Major
onwards, should be strung up.
----------------------------------------
Paul Weston 09/09/22
What a tragic day. Not just for the Queen's family, but for so
much more.
Over the last one thousand years, England has been a Sovereign
nation presided over by the Royal family. Prior to 1066 there was a
near one thousand years of Monarchy. During this vast time span
England was defeated just once and went on to give much of the
world freedom, democracy and modernity.
Time speeded up over the reign of Queen Elizabeth II. The country
and world she was born into is no more. Her death marks not just
the end of a Monarch's reign, but the end of an epoch and the end
of a civilisation.
1952 was not so dissimilar to 1882 in terms of the English people
and society. 2022 is very different to 1952. During her seventy
year reign a great deal has changed compared to the seventy years
prior to her accession.
It is difficult to put this into words, but I feel this day is one
of those hinge points in history. Someone we thought would always
be there and someone we have grown to take for granted has gone.
Losing a parent is a terrible thing for a small number of
relatives. Losing Queen Elizabeth II is a terrible thing for us as
a nation and the world. I suppose one has to be of a certain age to
feel this way. Young people might well find my maundering
inexplicable. Yet I feel as I feel. I have a deep sadness for what
has passed and a terrible foreboding for what is to come.
Our constant has gone and huge change is now upon us. Our Queen's
existence gave us a false sense of confidence that epochal change
could never happen, but her death is the end of an epoch and
epochal change is here.
England will never be the same again. The World will never be the
same again. Western civilisation will never be the same again. The
Queen's death has huge ramifications for global mankind. Nothing
will ever be same again and I have a horrible feeling the coming
changes will make the world a poorer, sadder place.
R.I.P. Queen Elizabeth II. We loved you as our Monarch and we
loved you as our mother.
----------------------------------------
TCW - 29/09/22 But the problem is the policymakers themselves -
'the handful of people in positions of power who have committed us
to a dramatic reduction of our carbon dioxide emissions', and the
European Commission, which has transformed these commitments into a
legal requirement to reduce emissions by 55 per cent from 1990
levels before 2030 - the so-called 'Fit for 55' laws, setting in
motion a change to society of a scale that is hard to comprehend.
----------------------------------------
BBC News - 05/10/2022
Russia is putting a brave face on its recent losses, in the east
and the south. But those losses are so dramatic that it's hard to
put a positive spin on them.
Russian forces have been constantly out-manoeuvred and out-thought
by the Ukrainian military. As one Western official put it
yesterday, "Ukrainian commanders are throwing problems at the
Russian chain of command faster than the Russians can respond."
Russia, of course, is in the middle of a major process of
mobilisation. It's chaotic and riddled with problems but it will,
in time, generate a significant number of new troops. How effective
they will be remains to be seen, but 200,000 men is not nothing.
Ukraine knows this and is keeping up the pace, trying to take as
much ground as it can before Russia is able to strike back. It has
no such manpower problems, and it's getting more and more
sophisticated Western equipment every day.
As things stand, it's hard to see how Russia can regain any of the
territory it has just retreated from. Its losses, in manpower,
equipment and morale, have been quite staggering. It's been many
months since it could boast any significant achievements. Ukrainian
forces, meanwhile, are exuding confidence.
This could change, but it would need several things to happen.
Russia's newly conscripted soldiers would have to be put to
effective use. Its commanders would have to show a great deal more
creativity than they have so far. And the West would have to lose
interest in Ukraine.
For Moscow, the omens are not good.
----------------------------------------
The Party System - Hilaire Belloc
In the case of that popular demand we all know what happened. The
country not only by an overwhelming majority, but with an
overwhelming intensity, gave the mandate that the Chinese should
go, and that they should go at once. It was a mandate based upon
a mixture of popular emotions, not the least of which was the
desire to chastise those South African Jews who had compelled our
politicians as their servants to exploit for financial ends the
popular enthusiasm in the matter of the South African war. It
was, again, a demand for the signal punishment of the first
attempt made since modern industrialism began, to move labour in
large batches from place to place upon a scheme arranged by
capital for the interests of capital alone. Popular instinct
seized at once upon the enormous danger of that initial
experiment, and perceived with sound sense that if it were not
made an example of, and if the South African Jews were not taught
a sharp lesson, the whole outlook and theory upon which this vile
experiment had been based would become the permanent theory and
outlook of international capitalism.
----------------------------------------
Nevertheless, it should be noted that the effect of the Party
System on even the cleverer politicians is to reduce the normal
level of their intelligence. It is quite incredible that such
men as Mr Asquith and Mr Lloyd George, Mr Balfour and Mr
F. E. Smith could under any other circumstances give expression
to such imbecilities as those which constantly adorn their public
speeches. They would not talk like that at dinner or at their
clubs. But the standard of intellect in politics is so low that
men of moderate mental capacity have to stoop in order to reach
it.
----------------------------------------
The degraded Parliament may ultimately be replaced by some other
organ; but no such other organ appears to be forming, and until
we get our first glimpse of it we are in for one of those evil
spaces, subject to foreign insult and domestic misfortune, which
invariably attach to nations when, for a period, they lose grip
over their own destinies.
----------------------------------------
This morning I was reading
"
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/04/13/no-flying-by-2050-is-the-
world-finally-waking-up-to-what-net-zero-really-means/" in The
Daily Sceptic about "Net Zero" and possibly no more flying for
peasants by 2050, and it occurred to me yet again that this
wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. I'm not at all sure that
endless credit and foreign travel has really improved our peasant
lives at all, probably the opposite, and it's likely inevitable
that it will have to end when the sham financial system that
supports such a lifestyle ends, and that's looking like soon. The
problem is that at the same time, the same people are (and have
been for more than half a century) merrily destroying our native
environments and social bonds, which at least would give us some
roots to return to.
"
https://preussische-kuriositaeten.net/2017/09/07/fuchs-eier-u
nd-schaumwein/", Marwitz hatte Recht.
----------------------------------------
Excuse the subject matter but
"
https://millennialwoes.substack.com/p/bestiality-and-me" makes a
good point about the limits of reason. If anything can be
justified by reason, then either everything is permissible, which
obviously is leading us already to a very dark place (don't make me
tap the sign), or reason is not always correct, in which case the
last 250 years or so have been a catastrophically disastrous failed
experiment in man's hubris and arrogance. I think this may have
been pointed out to us a couple of thousand years ago, but we never
listen.
----------------------------------------
As the Global American Empire continues to decline, the gap between
American sensibilities and European ones will become too big to
ignore. This will become apparent in the next year as the war
weighs on Europe. At some point, European elites will have to make
a choice. They can continue to follow the Americans into the abyss
or make a break and look out for their own interests. The concept
of the West existing on both sides of the Atlantic will come into
question. Zman 04/09/23 -
https://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=30664
----------------------------------------
If in 2015 you would have told me the US would have given over 100
Billion in aid to a military "ally" in a hot war with Russia that
had an American transsexual wearing an obvious wig as its
spokesperson issuing death threats to journalists covering the war
for not lying about it, all with our approval, I'd have told you
that you are drinking way too much, but now it's hard to imagine
things being any other way. 25/09/23
----------------------------------------
https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Marpingen_%E2%80%93_wie_Wunder_entst
ehen_und_vergehen
----------------------------------------
Of democracy, John Adams wrote, "I do not say that democracy has
been more pernicious, on the whole, and in the long run, than
monarchy or aristocracy. Democracy has never been and never can be
so durable as aristocracy or monarchy, but while it lasts it is
more bloody than either."
----------------------------------------
In the second half of the last century when Communism and Zionism
began their simultaneous assault on the West, Europe was a place of
strong and confident states well able to withstand the effects of
inner troubles and foreign wars. The revolutionary outbreaks of
1848 had been overcome without great exertion. Austria-Hungary and
France were not much weakened by their Prussian defeats in 1866 and
1871; they resumed their national existences, as defeated countries
for centuries had done, side by side with yesterday's victor, and
soon were tranquil again. The Balkan people, emerging from five
centuries of Turkish rule also were moving towards prosperity, in
the kindlier air of national freedom. On the eastern borders of
Europe Russia, under the flag of Christendom, appeared to be
joining in this process of national and individual improvement.
The appearance was deceptive, for the two maggots were in the
apple, and today's scene shows the result. The eighteen Christian
centuries which, despite ups and downs showed a total sum of human
betterment greater than that of any earlier time known to man, were
coming either to an end or an interregnum; which, we still do not
know, though believers have no doubt about the good resumption,
somewhen. However, one eminent man of that period, from whom
confidence in the outcome might have been expected, foresaw what
was to come in our century and thought it would be the end, not a
transient Dark Age.
This was Henry Edward Manning, the English clergyman who was
converted to Rome, became Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, and,
had he accepted nomination by his fellow cardinals, might have
become Pope. Edmund Burke, John Adams and Alexander Hamilton had
all perceived the worldwide aims of the revolution and foretold its
spreading eruptions. Disraeli, Bakunin and others, a half-century
later, had testified to, and warned against, the Jewish usurpation
of the revolutionary leadership. Manning joined in these warnings
but also foresaw the coming of Zionism and the part it would play
in the dual process.
----------------------------------------
Douglas Reed - 1956 Mr. Churchill never publicly stated any such
intention (indeed, he denied it), but if it was his view this means
that even the Zionist state set up after the Second World War by no
means fulfils the intention of those who made the Balfour
Declaration, and that further conquests of Arab lands have yet to
be made by war.
----------------------------------------
Thus at the end of 1955 a presidential-election year again
impended, in circumstances which the dominant power in America had
always found ideal: an ailing president, party-politicians avid for
"the Jewish vote," a war situation in the Middle East and another
in Europe. In such a state of affairs "domestic political pressure"
in the capital of the world's wealthiest and best-armed country
might produce almost any result. The Republican party-managers,
desperate to retain at least a nominal Republican in the White
House if they could not gain a majority in Congress, gathered round
a sick man and urged him to run.
----------------------------------------
Z-Man 02\09\2024 "The peculiar composition of the post-war ruling
class made Christian ethics a bit of a problem"
----------------------------------------
Rather, the problem seems to stem from a particular way of thinking
about what a company even is, what its goals are, and what measures
are or are not appropriate to achieve those goals. In simplified
terms, we can think of companies as organized to create value and
sustain themselves by capturing a portion of the created value as
financial profit. When executives, board members, and major
investors manage companies by and for the bottom line, they operate
on a theory of the company as a vehicle solely for capturing
profit. When this happens, the difficult and holistic question of
creating value in the first place--a question unique for every
company--simply goes unaddressed. It is treated as a permanently
solved, one-time problem that no longer merits attention or
resources; at Boeing, for instance, senior engineers were
reportedly told they were no longer needed because Boeing's
products were "mature," as if it was impossible for further
progress in airplanes to ever be made. The focus is instead on
raising profit margins and share prices through cost-cutting and
various other attempts to improve efficiency or appeal to
investors. This school of thought appears to be the dominant one in
the influential U.S. financial sector and might be termed
"shareholder capitalism."
----------------------------------------
Three of the best known works on the Second World War are General
Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe (New York: Doubleday [Country Life
Press], 1948), Winston Churchill's The Second World War (London:
Cassell, 6 vols., 1948-1954), and the Memoires de guerre of General
de Gaulle (Paris: Plon, 3 vols., 1954-1959). In these three works
not the least mention of Nazi gas chambers is to be found.
Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six
volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de
Gaulle's three-volume Memoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this
mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including
the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find
no mention either of Nazi "gas chambers," a "genocide" of the Jews,
or of "six million" Jewish victims of the war.
----------------------------------------
The fact that anyone would ever even consider voting for the
Harris-Walz ticket, combined with the fact that 1,312,349 people
voted to RE-ELECT Walz as the Governor of Minnesota, is sufficient
proof that representative democracy is an unmitigated catastrophe
and a worse form of government than monarchy, the lottery, or
pretty much any other historical or imaginary form of government.
----------------------------------------
Lost in a dark wood Oct 24, 2024 9:49 AM
It can be stated without hesitation that the pandemic was the
largest propaganda campaign, the largest covert operation and the
most deceptive hoax in human history.
No, that honour goes to the world wars (first, second, cold); the
fake binary of communism and fascism; and the saviour of humanity
in the form of the United Nations. It was all a scripted hoax in
which the "pandemic" was just a minor scene.
----------------------------------------
Ah yes! PICNIC! Problem in chair not in computer.
----------------------------------------
What we do know is that it was by experience and education that
little commonwealths lose their liberty; that absolute sovereignty
is something not merely ancient but rather relatively modern; and
it is at the end of the path called progress that men return to
the king. -- Everlasting Man 07\01\2025
----------------------------------------
In spite of all the civilising elements around them, there is a
distinct tendency to sink into the state of an African tribe. It
is naturally impossible to foretell the effect of all the
influences which are now at work in the world, and which seem to
foreshadow many changes. We appear standing on the threshold of a
period of great discoveries, which may modify many things, but not
man's nature.
----------------------------------------
Isn't it true that we now intuitively understand "civil rights" as
a synonym for coerced association, an enlargement rather than a
diminution of the state's power to push us around?
Joseph Sobran
----------------------------------------
Sadly I'm in the 'too late' camp. The idea of reshoring would have
been great in the dim past, but now I have a hard time seeing how
the US can take up the slack. I work in manufacturing, with
experience across the automotive, medical device, packaging, and
consumer electronics industries. The common factor among them - the
availability of workers with an IQ over 85 and a generally positive
attitude toward showing up to grind out finished goods is very,
very thin below the age of 50.
----------------------------------------
(for some idea of the extent of the control by Jews in the city of
Berlin five years after Hitler assumed power, see the Reader's
Digest for May, 1938, p. 126)
----------------------------------------
However, this is a necessary but sufficient condition. "[Our]
fellow whites ... got outmaneuvered, brainwashed, and bamboozled"
because they were honorless merchants who were inadequately
ethnocentric. Any replacement ruling class must be self-consciously
structured to avoid their mistakes.
----------------------------------------
For example, what if Russia adopts Israel's strategy of war via
assassination and applies it to the member states of the European
Union? It could enact similar regime change in Germany, France,
Poland, and the UK overnight.
----------------------------------------
The old pre-1795 Poland - a feudal republic with an elective king -
is a converse example; it illustrates how before the advent of the
modern state the position of the Jews was socially most important,
and their internal autonomy greatest, under a regime which was
completely retarded to the point of utter degeneracy.
