(C) Wisconsin Watch

(C) Wisconsin Watch
This story was originally published by Wisconsin Watch and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .

Why does Wisconsin election panel get say on complaint vs. itself? [1]

['Jack Kelly', 'Wisconsin Watch', 'More Jack Kelly']

Date: 2024-02-12 12:00:00+00:00

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Wisconsin Watch readers have submitted questions to our statehouse team, and we’ll answer them in our series, Ask Wisconsin Watch. Have a question about state government? Ask it here.

The way the Wisconsin Elections Commission handles complaints filed against the agency, a specific commissioner or a member of the commission’s staff has evolved since the commission launched in 2016.

Recent complaints filed against WEC, a commissioner or agency staff have largely been “disposed of without consideration by the commission.”

The elections commission maintains that it takes this approach because any such complaint “warrants an ethical recusal by the body,” according to a recent dismissal of a complaint filed against the agency’s six commissioners.

“The Commission’s position reflects the need to avoid conflicts associated with an adjudicative body deciding a matter brought against itself, similar to the provisions of law and ethics precluding a judge from presiding over a case filed against herself, or someone with personal or professional ties to her,” WEC attorney Angela Sharpe wrote to Kirk Bangstad, a liberal activist who filed a complaint against the commissioners after they permitted former President Donald Trump to appear on Wisconsin’s primary ballot.

The commission has previously hired outside attorneys to review complaints filed against the agency, the commissioners or agency staff.

“In recent years, the commission has trended toward returning such complaints to the complainant, noting that they may pursue their matter through other avenues,” WEC spokesperson Riley Vetterkind told Wisconsin Watch.

He added “each complaint is unique and may require a different approach.”

For example, if a complaint is returned by the commission, the complainant can ask a county circuit court to intervene.

The commission’s current practice of returning complaints filed against itself, a commissioner or a staff member without consideration is consistent with a recent Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling. The high court, in a 4-3 decision concerning unmanned absentee ballot drop boxes, agreed that “it would be nonsensical to have WEC adjudicate a claim against itself.”

Republish This Story Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Close window X Republish this article This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Scroll down to copy and paste the code of our article into your CMS. The codes for images, graphics and other embeddable elements may not transfer exactly as they appear on our site. *** Also, the code below will NOT copy the featured image on the page. You are welcome to download the main image as a separate element for publication with this story. *** You are welcome to republish our articles for free using the following ground rules. Credit should be given, in this format: “By Dee J. Hall, Wisconsin Watch”

Editing material is prohibited, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and in-house style (for example, using “Waunakee, Wis.” instead of “Waunakee” or changing “yesterday” to “last week”)

Other than minor cosmetic and font changes, you may not change the structural appearance or visual format of a story.

If published online, you must include the links and link to wisconsinwatch.org

If you share the story on social media, please mention @wisconsinwatch (Twitter, Facebook and Instagram), and ensure that the original featured image associated with the story is visible on the social media post.

Don’t sell the story or any part of it — it may not be marketed as a product.

Don’t extract, store or resell Wisconsin Watch content as a database.

Don’t sell ads against the story. But you can publish it with pre-sold ads.

Your website must include a prominent way to contact you.

Additional elements that are packaged with our story must be labeled.

Users can republish our photos, illustrations, graphics and multimedia elements ONLY with stories with which they originally appeared. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use.

If we send you a request to change or remove Wisconsin Watch content from your site, you must agree to do so immediately. *** Also, the code below will NOT copy the featured image on the page. You are welcome to download the main image as a separate element for publication with this story. *** You are welcome to republish our articles forusing the following ground rules. For questions regarding republishing rules please contact Coburn Dukehart, associate director, at [email protected] Why does the Wisconsin Elections Commission get to determine if any complaint against itself is valid? <h1>Why does the Wisconsin Elections Commission get to determine if any complaint against itself is valid?</h1> by Jack Kelly / Wisconsin Watch, Wisconsin Watch February 12, 2024 The way the Wisconsin Elections Commission handles complaints filed against the agency, a specific commissioner or a member of the commission’s staff has evolved since the commission launched in 2016. Recent complaints filed against WEC, a commissioner or agency staff have largely been “disposed of without consideration by the commission.” The elections commission maintains that it takes this approach because any such complaint “warrants an ethical recusal by the body,” according to a recent dismissal of a <a href="https://elections.wi.gov/sites/default/files/documents/02%20-%20Correspondence_EL%2023-58%20Kirk%20Bangstad%20v.%20Don%20Millis%20et%20al%20-%2012.28.2023.pdf">complaint</a> filed against the agency’s six commissioners. “The Commission’s position reflects the need to avoid conflicts associated with an adjudicative body deciding a matter brought against itself, similar to the provisions of law and ethics precluding a judge from presiding over a case filed against herself, or someone with personal or professional ties to her,” WEC attorney Angela Sharpe <a href="https://elections.wi.gov/sites/default/files/documents/02%20-%20Correspondence_EL%2023-58%20Kirk%20Bangstad%20v.%20Don%20Millis%20et%20al%20-%2012.28.2023.pdf">wrote</a> to Kirk Bangstad, a liberal activist who filed a <a href="https://elections.wi.gov/sites/default/files/documents/01%20-%20Complaint%20-%20Kirk%20Bangstad%20v.%20Don%20Millis%20et%20al%20-%20EL%2023-58.pdf">complaint</a> against the commissioners after they permitted former President Donald Trump to appear on Wisconsin’s primary ballot. The commission has previously hired outside attorneys to review complaints filed against the agency, the commissioners or agency staff. “In recent years, the commission has trended toward returning such complaints to the complainant, noting that they may pursue their matter through other avenues,” WEC spokesperson Riley Vetterkind told Wisconsin Watch. He added “each complaint is unique and may require a different approach.” For example, if a complaint is returned by the commission, the complainant <a href="https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/5/i/06/8">can ask</a> a county circuit court to intervene. The commission’s current practice of returning complaints filed against itself, a commissioner or a staff member without consideration is consistent with a recent Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling. The high court, in a 4-3 decision concerning unmanned absentee ballot drop boxes, <a href="https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542617">agreed</a> that “it would be nonsensical to have WEC adjudicate a claim against itself.” This <a target="_blank" href="https://wisconsinwatch.org/2024/02/wisconsin-elections-commission-complaints-government-recusal/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="https://wisconsinwatch.org">Wisconsin Watch</a> and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.<img src="https://i0.wp.com/wisconsinwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/cropped-WCIJ_IconOnly_FullColor_RGB-1.png?fit=150%2C150&quality=100&ssl=1" style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;"><img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="https://wisconsinwatch.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1287187&ga4=G-D2S69Y9TDB" style="width:1px;height:1px;"> Copy to Clipboard

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://wisconsinwatch.org/2024/02/wisconsin-elections-commission-complaints-government-recusal/

Published and (C) by Wisconsin Watch
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons BY-ND 4.0 Intl.

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/wisconsinwatch/