(C) Wisconsin Watch

(C) Wisconsin Watch
This story was originally published by Wisconsin Watch and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .

Wisconsin GOP at odds over final five and ranked-choice voting [1]

['Jack Kelly', 'Wisconsin Watch', 'More Jack Kelly']

Date: 2024-01-08 11:55:00+00:00

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Bill Watch takes a closer look at what’s notable about legislation grinding its way through the Capitol. Subscribe to our newsletters for more from Wisconsin Watch.

Legislative Republicans are at odds over bringing final five voting and ranked-choice voting to Wisconsin. On one side, a bipartisan group of lawmakers, led by Sen. Jesse James, R-Altoona, wants to bring both practices to the state’s congressional and U.S. Senate races. On the other side, Rep. Ty Bodden, R-Hilbert, and Sen. Duey Stroebel, R-Saukville, are pushing a constitutional amendment that would outlaw both systems in the state.

Here’s what you need to know:

What are final five voting and ranked-choice voting? Final five voting involves all candidates, regardless of party affiliation, running in the same primary election. The five candidates who receive the most votes then advance to the general election (for example, the general election ballot could feature two Republicans, two Democrats and one Libertarian). The general election then uses ranked-choice voting — sometimes referred to as “instant runoff” voting. In this system, voters rank the candidates in order of preference. After each round of counting, the candidate who receives the fewest votes is eliminated, and the voters who ranked that candidate first have their ballots redistributed based on their next choice. The process continues until one candidate receives a majority of the vote.

Why watch? Republicans have split their votes on certain issues — such as the Milwaukee Brewers stadium — but they don’t often introduce dueling proposals. The Senate Elections Committee held a public hearing on James’ final five voting bill in December. It’s not clear if the bills will advance further in the Senate this session, but a public hearing is further than any similar proposal has gotten. A spokesperson for committee chair Sen. Dan Knodl said a committee vote on the bill has not been scheduled.

Yea: Proponents of final five voting argue the system would help stabilize the country’s volatile politics because partisan primaries reward the most extreme candidates who must appeal to a more far-right or far-left pool of voters. Given the partisan skew of scores of congressional districts across the country, low-turnout primaries often determine the general election winner. In 2022, just 8% of U.S. voters elected 83% of U.S. House members, according to data from Unite America, a nonprofit that advocates for political reforms. Final five voting would allow more candidates to reach the general election, where a wider voter pool could reward more moderate candidates.

Nay: Opposition to final five voting often stems from opposition to ranked-choice voting. Opponents say ranked-choice voting results in ballots being thrown out, leaving some voters without a say in an election if they don’t rank all the candidates and the ones they do rank are eliminated. In a co-sponsorship memo for their constitutional amendment, Bodden and Stroebel expressed concerns that “when many Wisconsinites are asking the Legislature to simplify the mechanics of our election system, ranked-choice voting would further complicate it with calculations that dictate outcomes that are not intuitive to every voter.”

State of play: Alaska currently utilizes a final four primary system for its U.S. House and Senate races. Alaska and Maine use a ranked-choice voting system for some elections.

Republish This Story Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Close window X Republish this article This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Scroll down to copy and paste the code of our article into your CMS. The codes for images, graphics and other embeddable elements may not transfer exactly as they appear on our site. *** Also, the code below will NOT copy the featured image on the page. You are welcome to download the main image as a separate element for publication with this story. *** You are welcome to republish our articles for free using the following ground rules. Credit should be given, in this format: “By Dee J. Hall, Wisconsin Watch”

Editing material is prohibited, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and in-house style (for example, using “Waunakee, Wis.” instead of “Waunakee” or changing “yesterday” to “last week”)

Other than minor cosmetic and font changes, you may not change the structural appearance or visual format of a story.

If published online, you must include the links and link to wisconsinwatch.org

If you share the story on social media, please mention @wisconsinwatch (Twitter, Facebook and Instagram), and ensure that the original featured image associated with the story is visible on the social media post.

Don’t sell the story or any part of it — it may not be marketed as a product.

Don’t extract, store or resell Wisconsin Watch content as a database.

Don’t sell ads against the story. But you can publish it with pre-sold ads.

Your website must include a prominent way to contact you.

Additional elements that are packaged with our story must be labeled.

Users can republish our photos, illustrations, graphics and multimedia elements ONLY with stories with which they originally appeared. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use.

If we send you a request to change or remove Wisconsin Watch content from your site, you must agree to do so immediately. *** Also, the code below will NOT copy the featured image on the page. You are welcome to download the main image as a separate element for publication with this story. *** You are welcome to republish our articles forusing the following ground rules. For questions regarding republishing rules please contact Coburn Dukehart, associate director, at [email protected] Bill Watch: Wisconsin GOP at odds over final five and ranked-choice voting <h1>Bill Watch: Wisconsin GOP at odds over final five and ranked-choice voting</h1> by Jack Kelly / Wisconsin Watch, Wisconsin Watch January 8, 2024 Legislative Republicans are at odds over bringing final five voting and ranked-choice voting to Wisconsin. On one side, a bipartisan group of lawmakers, led by Sen. Jesse James, R-Altoona, wants to bring <a href="https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2023/related/proposals/sb528">both practices</a> to the state's congressional and U.S. Senate races. On the other side, Rep. Ty Bodden, R-Hilbert, and Sen. Duey Stroebel, R-Saukville, are pushing a <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24223874-23-5232_1">constitutional amendment</a> that would outlaw both systems in the state. Here’s what you need to know: <ul> <li>What are final five voting and ranked-choice voting? Final five voting involves all candidates, regardless of party affiliation, running in the same primary election. The five candidates who receive the most votes then advance to the general election (for example, the general election ballot could feature two Republicans, two Democrats and one Libertarian). The general election then uses ranked-choice voting — sometimes referred to as <a href="https://electionlab.mit.edu/research/instant-runoff-voting">“instant runoff” voting</a>. In this system, voters rank the candidates in order of preference. After each round of counting, the candidate who receives the fewest votes is eliminated, and the voters who ranked that candidate first have their ballots redistributed based on their next choice. The process continues until one candidate receives a majority of the vote.</li> </ul> <ul> <li>Why watch? Republicans have split their votes on certain issues — such as the Milwaukee Brewers stadium — but they don’t often introduce dueling proposals. The Senate Elections Committee held a public hearing on James’ final five voting bill in December. It’s not clear if the bills will advance further in the Senate this session, but a public hearing is further than any similar proposal has gotten. A spokesperson for committee chair Sen. Dan Knodl said a committee vote on the bill has not been scheduled.</li> </ul> <ul> <li>Yea: Proponents of final five voting argue the system would help stabilize the country’s volatile politics because partisan primaries reward the most extreme candidates who must appeal to a more far-right or far-left pool of voters. Given the partisan skew of scores of congressional districts across the country, low-turnout primaries often determine the general election winner. In 2022, just 8% of U.S. voters elected 83% of U.S. House members, according to <a href="https://primaryproblem.uniteamerica.org/">data</a> from Unite America, a nonprofit that advocates for political reforms. Final five voting would allow more candidates to reach the general election, where a wider voter pool could reward more moderate candidates.</li> </ul> <ul> <li>Nay: Opposition to final five voting often stems from opposition to ranked-choice voting. Opponents say ranked-choice voting results in ballots being thrown out, leaving some voters without a say in an election if they don’t rank all the candidates and the ones they do rank are eliminated. In a co-sponsorship <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24233247-rcv-co-sponsorship-memo">memo</a> for their constitutional amendment, Bodden and Stroebel expressed concerns that “when many Wisconsinites are asking the Legislature to simplify the mechanics of our election system, ranked-choice voting would further complicate it with calculations that dictate outcomes that are not intuitive to every voter.”</li> </ul> <ul> <li>State of play: Alaska currently utilizes a final four primary system for its U.S. House and Senate races. Alaska and Maine use <a href="https://www.elections.alaska.gov/rcv/RCV%20Rack%20Card%20-%20Distribution.pdf">a ranked-choice voting system</a> for some elections.</li> </ul> This <a target="_blank" href="https://wisconsinwatch.org/2024/01/wisconsin-republican-voting-senate-assembly-legislation-bill-watch/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="https://wisconsinwatch.org">Wisconsin Watch</a> and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.<img src="https://i0.wp.com/wisconsinwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/cropped-WCIJ_IconOnly_FullColor_RGB-1.png?fit=150%2C150&quality=100&ssl=1" style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;"><img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="https://wisconsinwatch.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1285481&ga4=G-D2S69Y9TDB" style="width:1px;height:1px;"> Copy to Clipboard

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://wisconsinwatch.org/2024/01/wisconsin-republican-voting-senate-assembly-legislation-bill-watch/

Published and (C) by Wisconsin Watch
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons BY-ND 4.0 Intl.

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/wisconsinwatch/