This story was originally published on TheConversation.com/us.
   License: Creative Commons - Attributions/No Derivities[1]
   --------------------------------------------------------------


Innovation sociale : la meilleure méthode d’évaluation d’impact dépend de l’avancée de projet
By:   ['Anne-Claire Pache', 'Greg Molecke', 'Éléonore Delanoë']
Date: 2021-03-30 22:43:59+00:00

Disclosure statement

Anne-Claire Pache est professeur titulaire de la Chaire Philanthropie de l'ESSEC. La Chaire Philanthropie de l'ESSEC a reçu des financements de la part de la Fondation de France, de la Fondation Caritas France, des Fondations Edmond de Rothschild, de la Fondation Daniel & Nina Carasso et de la Fondation Bettencourt Schueller.

Éléonore Delanoë est associée de recherche au Laboratoire d'Evaluation et de mesure d'impact social de l'ESSEC (E&MIS).

Greg Molecke does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

[1] Url: https://theconversation.com/innovation-sociale-la-meilleure-methode-devaluation-dimpact-depend-de-lavancee-de-projet-157623

You are viewing proxied material from magical.fish. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.