(C) Daily Montanan
This story was originally published by Daily Montanan and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



New work requirements could cause same old problems for state • Daily Montanan [1]

['Darrell Ehrlick', 'Shalina Chatlani', 'Loreben Tuquero', 'More From Author', 'August', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar']

Date: 2025-08-13

As Congress makes sweeping changes to the health insurance system and, in particular, the marketplace exchange, some healthcare leaders are concerned that the state and federal government isn’t quite prepared to roll out what Congress approved.

One of the largest concerns centers on the idea of “churn” — people who become eligible or not eligible, almost like a light switch turning off and on, because of administrative paperwork.

Montana already has “work” requirements, or exemptions for those on Medicaid. According to the most recent published study, 97% of those already meet the exemptions to qualify, according to “Medicaid in Montana,” an annual report that tracks the program’s usage in Montana, funded by the Montana Healthcare Foundation.

Federal fallout: Medicaid and insurance in Montana The Daily Montanan is launching a series of articles that breaks down some of the biggest changes implemented by Congress and signed into law by President Donald Trump in the so-called “Big, beautiful bill.” All four members of Montana’s Congressional delegation — Republicans Sens. Steve Daines and Tim Sheehy, along with Reps. Troy Downing and Ryan Zinke — voted for these changes. Today’s stories are the third installment: Redetermination redo: New work requirements put in place by the Trump administration and narrowly approved by Congress mean that states will now need more documentation and verification that those receiving Medicaid are eligible because they’re working or meet an exemption. Montana’s history with the “determination” and “redetermination” process means that residents who qualify could be accidentally left without insurance while the state must now be in a state of increased processing and reprocessing. (Story by the Daily Montanan.) Reality check: About all those people watching TV. For years, many conservatives, including U.S. Sen. Steve Daines, have claimed legions of people were essentially freeloading off the government, collecting health insurance benefits without work. However, PolitiFact digs into that claim and finds the narrative, while politically satisfying, is a fiction. (Story by PolitiFact and KFF Health News) Determining difficulties: The “big, beautiful bill” will require those who want Medicaid to undergo a process of determination for eligibility. The work requirements are new for many states, and they’ll require verification and documentation, which will substantially increase the workload for states, leading some to say the process could be too much to handle. (Story by Stateline) Our previous stories have included: Another big change in the Big Sky: Whether you’re one of more than 100,000 people on Medicaid or whether you purchase your health insurance on the marketplace (healthcare.gov), recent federal changes will mean a decrease in people who qualify under expanded Medicaid, as well as hefty health insurance premium hikes from those who purchase a plan. (Story by the Daily Montanan.) Is $50 billion enough: Congress has allocated $50 billion to be used for rural state hospitals, which had been identified as particularly vulnerable in the “Big, beautiful” bill. Republicans from rural states demanded the money in exchange for the support, but will the fund be enough? And, what happens after it’s depleted? (Story by Stateline) Navigators no more: In February, Congress also voted to defund most of the health insurance navigators at the state level. In Montana, 90% of the navigators won’t be available after many of these changes become reality, leaving residents to answer questions on their own, or try their luck accessing one of the few left after the cuts. These navigators helped residents find insurance, understand their eligibility and explain policy differences. (Story by the Daily Montanan.) Less leeway: States like Montana had previously come up with their own work eligibility and verification programs. But with the new Trump rules surrounding Medicaid, that means states have less flexibility and fewer resources to navigate the changes (Story by KFF Health News)

However, Montana’s experience with the “disenrollment” process is making some wonder if history is about to repeat itself — over and over again.

The concern centers on the amount of work the new legislation requires.

Now, not only are work requirements mandatory for much of Medicaid eligibility, those requirements force a whole new system of verification and paperwork. That paperwork and eligibility has to be documented and reviewed, mostly by state-level workers who “determine” a resident’s eligibility.

Montana’s Medicaid landscape changed dramatically two years ago when the Legislature opted to discontinue a policy of “continuous eligibility,” which ensured that if a person qualified for Medicaid coverage, they remained on it for a year, until it was time to redetermine if the person was still eligible.

As Montana rolled out its new verification and determination process, members of the public, healthcare officials and lawmakers were outraged at the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services. As many as one-third of those enrolled had a lapse in healthcare coverage because of administrative issues, from missing documents to impossibly long wait-times where people would be left stranded on hold for hours. Gradually, as state health department workers worked through redetermining the entire Medicaid population of Montana, which numbered, at the time, more than 120,000, officials caught up.

But now, with new work requirements, new documentation and verification that must happen at least twice a year, providers are worried that people who qualify for Medicaid coverage will lose it due to the same administrative challenges.

“These people if they’re working hard and low income, there is a lot of documentation to it,” said Dr. Aaron Wernham, CEO of Montana Healthcare Foundation. His organization has studied the effects of “redetermination” as it rolled out in Montana, but also spoken with other states.

“Documentation is hard and it requires a lot of the state. Each single case takes time,” Wernham said.

He said work-requirement programs in other states have had mixed results. For example, Wernham said that Georgia has experimented with it.

“It costs an enormous amount of money because of the verification. It’s very expensive,” Wernham said. “If you talk to a lot of clinics, what they’re really worried about is that people will just disappear.”

He said that means that many will likely become overwhelmed or frustrated with the process and just delay seeking medical care.

The Daily Montanan reached out to officials from the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services on several occasions with questions about its capacity and processes given the new federal legislation. No official responded to those requests.

“We saw what happened when the state did it all at once,” said Montana Hospital Association CEO Ed Buttrey. Buttrey was a Republican member of the Montana Legislature through the 2025 session, and many of his colleagues on both sides of the political aisle were frustrated. “It’s not that bad now, but what happens when they start doing this every six months?”

Another looming reality

As officials are scrambling to figure out what the new determination and requirements will be for Medicaid going forward, the financial reality in Montana is even more severe, compared with larger or younger states.

“Many of those people are probably expected to drop their coverage before they have been priced out altogether,” said Cynthia Cox, the vice president of KFF Health for ACA Programs. “And those folks, the people who make more than four times poverty are disproportionately older adults, like pre-retirees or early retirees, they’re more likely to live in rural areas and they’re more likely to be small business owners.”

The state’s aging population means more and more healthcare institutions rely on Medicaid or Medicare. But that reliance puts a premium on two other areas — private-pay insurance or strictly managing “uncompensated,” or “charity” care, where a healthcare system doesn’t receive a full payment or any payment for services it provides.

Because the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid have lower reimbursement rates for doctors and hospitals, private insurance plans usually wind up subsidizing Medicare and Medicaid patients. However, because the state has such a high percentage of people who utilize the federal programs, the number of people considering not having health insurance is sky rocketing.

Cynthia Cox, the Vice President of KFF’s Program on the ACA, said the reality will begin in January, and once it begins, it will be a difficult trend to reverse.

“The Congressional Budget Office expect that eventually, 4 million people will become uninsured due to the expiration of these enhanced premium tax credits,” Cox said. “I would expect that to play out with a big drop in coverage Jan. 1 or so and then over a longer period of time, eventually adding up to 4 million. That’s going to happen in less than six months.”

That means there could be a resurgence of uncompensated care, which could lead to hospital closures. Nearly half of Montana is covered by either Medicaid or Medicare. According to the Montana Health Foundation, 22% of the state has Medicaid, while the federal government reports 20% are on Medicare.

“We have a handful of hospitals that are over 50% Medicaid and so even small shifts in revenue streams could be really detrimental,” said Katy Mack, the vice president of the Montana Hospital Association.

Some rural hospital margins are lower than one-half of one percent.

“We just don’t have the wiggle room to treat a patient without pay,” she said.

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://dailymontanan.com/2025/08/13/new-work-requirements-could-cause-same-old-problems-for-state/

Published and (C) by Daily Montanan
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/montanan/