(C) Missouri Independent
This story was originally published by Missouri Independent and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .
Coverage without care: What Medicaid expansion missed in Missouri • Missouri Independent [1]
['Bridgette Dunlap', 'Julie Brinn Siegel', 'Luke Farrell', 'More From Author', 'June', 'Abehrhardt', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline']
Date: 2025-06-30
In Missouri, we don’t just live with fewer healthcare options. We live with the knowledge that when help doesn’t come, it’s not an accident. It’s policy.
I’m a nurse. I’ve worked in rural hospitals, in short-staffed ICUs, in systems that have learned how to survive without actually protecting anyone. And what I see now is worse than neglect. It reflects a pattern of disinvestment that disproportionately harms the communities least able to withstand it.
When Missouri expanded Medicaid, it should have brought relief to communities long denied basic care. But expansion on paper doesn’t mean access in practice. Administrative backlogs, endless documentation hurdles, and network gaps continue to leave people stranded. In rural Missouri, I’ve seen patients with Medicaid cards still turned away. Expansion without infrastructure does not create equity, it creates the appearance of reform without its substance.
In 2020, Missouri voters passed Medicaid expansion through a ballot initiative. Lawmakers delayed implementation for nearly a year. That delay wasn’t just bureaucratic. It was ideological. The same political opposition continues to influence how care is distributed or withheld across the state.
To be clear, challenges in administering Medicaid are real. Eligibility redeterminations involve complex systems. Rural provider recruitment is difficult. Coordination between state agencies and federal requirements often creates delays that are frustrating for both patients and administrators.
But acknowledging these logistical hurdles does not excuse their persistence. Missouri’s failure is not in encountering difficulty. It is in choosing not to fix what has been broken for years. When barriers are allowed to persist despite known solutions, the outcome is not accidental.
Meanwhile, Missouri continues to use a provider tax shell game to draw down billions in federal Medicaid dollars. Hospitals get the financial boost. But there is no requirement that those dollars improve care, staff safety, or patient outcomes. The state collects its match. The money circulates. And the hospitals that serve the poorest communities still close.
According to the Leapfrog Group and the U.S. Office of Inspector General, preventable harm events including falls, infections, and medication errors are significantly more common in hospitals with chronic staffing shortages. While safety grades vary across Missouri, the pattern is clear: when staffing ratios fall, risks to patients rise.
When Noble Health shut down the hospital in Mexico, Missouri, in 2022, patients were given no notice. Staff were told by text message. The facility that once served 11,000 ER visits a year went dark overnight. The company had collected CARES Act funds and Medicaid reimbursements before walking away, leaving behind debt, missing records, and no services.
According to state officials, 12 rural hospitals have closed in Missouri since 2014, with a total of 21 hospital closures statewide during that period. More than a dozen others are at risk. OB units are disappearing. Behavioral health beds are gone. And the people left behind are expected to accept this as a funding issue, not a policy choice.
Between June 2023 and May 2024, 400,000 Missourians, including nearly 200,000 children, lost Medicaid coverage. The majority were still eligible but were removed due to procedural errors, incomplete paperwork, or system backlogs. This phenomenon, known as ‘churn,’ is well documented and largely preventable.
Missouri’s procedural termination rate has been among the highest in the country. During several months in 2023, more than 70% of terminations occurred for paperwork reasons rather than actual ineligibility, significantly above the national average.
These administrative failures have financial consequences. When coverage is lost due to technicalities, the state avoids paying for services and saves money. In rural Missouri, where local caseworkers are often nonexistent and providers are scarce, losing Medicaid means losing access altogether.
The Missouri Department of Social Services has long struggled with timely renewals and enrollment processing. But instead of investing in systems that protect continuity of care, the state has maintained systems that obscure accountability and allow breakdowns to persist without correction.
Clinics lose reimbursements. Hospitals reduce services. Patients disengage. Not from care, but from a system that seems designed to shed them.
This is often framed as fiscal responsibility, but in effect, it is policy negligence with life-altering consequences.
In towns like Mexico, Moberly and Kennett, residents already live hours from specialty care.
When the local ER shuts down, it is not just an inconvenience. It is a death sentence that arrives slowly through missed diagnoses, delayed stroke care, untreated infections and silent mental health crises.
Stroke centers disappear when hospitals downgrade. Cardiac care vanishes when chest pain is rerouted to the next county. For rural Missourians, the question is not just when care will arrive, but whether it will arrive in time to matter. This is not a new phenomenon.
A similar wave of closures followed Medicare payment reforms in the 1980s and 1990s. What is different now is how much more consolidated and extractive the system has become. What we are seeing in 2025 is not merely underinvestment, it is a systematic withdrawal of support, often driven by financial incentives misaligned with patient care.
I have watched patients wait twelve hours in ER hallways for a bed. I know of times where the early warning signs were missed because the nurse was covering too many patients. These are not rare exceptions. They are the predictable outcomes of chronic understaffing and systems that treat care as a cost center.
Missouri hospitals are facing a sustained staffing crisis.
In 2023, about 16% of registered nurse positions were vacant across the state. Rural hospitals have been hit especially hard, with turnover and burnout worsening year after year. In some Missouri facilities, nurses have reported caring for five or more patients in units designed for closer supervision, exceeding commonly accepted ratios for step-down care.
This is not a temporary problem. It reflects a chronic shortage that puts both patients and staff at risk. Unsafe staffing has become the norm, and no award or marketing campaign can disguise the consequences of underinvestment in the workforce.
We know what stabilizes care. Local hospitals. Fair reimbursement. Staff-to-patient ratios that protect workers and outcomes. Behavioral health beds. Transportation. Language access. These are not mysteries. They are choices.
Missouri must tie Medicaid dollars to measurable outcomes such as access, staffing and infrastructure. Without those guardrails, expansion remains a policy in name, not in practice.
Until then, rural patients will keep falling through cracks. That is not fiscal prudence. It is political malpractice. And we cannot afford to wait quietly for the next hospital to close.
[END]
---
[1] Url:
https://missouriindependent.com/2025/06/30/coverage-without-care-what-medicaid-expansion-missed-in-missouri/
Published and (C) by Missouri Independent
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/missouriindependent/
