(C) Fairness & Accuracy in Media
This story was originally published by Fairness & Accuracy in Media and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .
Corporate Media Sideline Proposals to Relieve Those Hardest Hit by Covid Crunch [1]
['Julie Hollar']
Date: 2020-07-01 15:59:52+00:00
Covid-related arrears put nearly a quarter of all US households at risk of eviction or foreclosure, according to one estimate (Washington Post, 5/31/20). The poor and people of color are the hardest hit, not just by the novel coronavirus but also by the economic fallout: More than half of lower-income adults say they or someone in their household has lost work, while only 32% of upper-income adults say the same.
Meanwhile, the vast majority of those low-income households don’t have emergency funds to weather such hard times. And more black and Hispanic households report having lost work and lacking emergency funds than white households (Pew Research Center, 4/21/20).
It’s easy enough to find reporting in major US news outlets describing the hardships many Americans are facing. But lamenting inequality is one thing, and acknowledging—or, God forbid, highlighting—efforts to rectify it are very much another for corporate media, who all but ignore serious, popular proposals that would prioritize those hardest hit.
The People’s Bailout, for instance, endorsed by hundreds of progressive groups and almost 100 members of Congress, calls on Congress to ensure “economic relief must be provided directly to the people,” in order to “rescue workers and communities, not corporate executives.” It calls for regular direct cash payments; free and accessible testing, treatment and PPE; and a halt to evictions, foreclosures, and water and electricity shutoffs.
Since the beginning of the pandemic, there have been only two mentions of the People’s Bailout in leading national news outlets, both in the Washington Post’s coverage of Earth Day (4/21/20, 4/22/20).
Or take the April 13 letter to Congress signed by a long list of national, state and local organizations, including Oxfam America, the NAACP and the AFL-CIO, calling for $500 billion in unrestricted aid to state, local, territorial and tribal governments—which are required to balance their budgets in the face of unprecedented shortfalls—in addition to payroll guarantees, continued unemployment insurance payments, another round of cash payments (regardless of immigration status), stronger worker protections, and full funding for frontline workers’ health and safety. (See CounterSpin, 4/17/20.) Not a single leading network or newspaper reported on this letter.
These aren’t wild ideas; even the bipartisan National Governors Association called for $500 billion in aid to states. But their call has gotten far less attention than Trump’s top “economic relief” priority: a suspension of payroll taxes, which would provide little in the way of economic relief (particularly to the unemployed, who are no longer paying such taxes), but would seriously endanger the Social Security program they fund (Reu-ters, 3/11/20). And yet, in the seven weeks following the NGA’s call, leading outlets ran only 35 stories that mentioned it, while Trump’s payroll tax cut proposal netted 95 mentions.
In an interview published in Vanity Fair (5/13/20), presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden made a startlingly progressive appeal for rent forgiveness:
There should be rent forgiveness and there should be mortgage forgiveness now in the middle of this crisis. Forgiveness. Not paid later, forgiveness. It’s critically important to people who are in lower-income strata.
It was a remarkable position for the self-consciously centrist candidate to take, and yet there was virtually no coverage of it in the country’s major news outlets. FAIR found one brief mention in the 22nd paragraph of a New York Times article by Carl Hulse (5/15/20) about potential blowback from Republicans’ resistance to further economic recovery measures.
That Times article is instructive about which recovery measures are even allowed in the media debate. The piece informed readers that a $3 trillion House relief bill
is several bridges too far, considering its giant cost and the underpinning of progressive policies on immigration and other issues that could never clear the Republican-controlled Senate.
While Hulse describes Republican resistance as “born of spending fatigue and policy divisions,” less Timesian assessments could be found elsewhere, as at Bloomberg (5/19/20): “Republicans are concerned that providing more assistance to states and individuals would slow movement by governors to lift business restrictions.”
Of course, to many both inside and outside of the party, that Democratic bill was not ambitious enough, as it included almost no key progressive demands—such as a federal paycheck guarantee program, ongoing direct monthly payments, an eviction and foreclosure moratorium, or expansion of Med- icare and Medicaid (Sanders.senate.gov, 5/14/20; Intercept, 5/15/20).
But Hulse’s piece is typical of corporate media, relying heavily on government (and corporate) sources, and marginalizing voices that should be crucial to the national conversation. As a recent FAIR study (5/22/20) of the networks’ Sunday morning political talkshows found, the guests given a platform to shape the discussion around both public health and economic strategies during the early weeks of the Covid-19 pandemic were overwhelmingly government officials; independent public health experts, and especially public interest groups, were sidelined. And by sidelining those voices, media sideline real solutions to the inequality they feign to
FAIR’s work is sustained by our generous contributors, who allow us to remain independent. Donate today to be a part of this important mission.
[END]
---
[1] Url:
https://fair.org/home/corporate-media-sideline-proposals-to-relieve-those-hardest-hit-by-covid-crunch/
Published and (C) by Fairness & Accuracy in Media
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 3.0.
via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/fair/
