(C) Alec Muffett's DropSafe blog.
Author Name: Alec Muffett
This story was originally published on allecmuffett.com. [1]
License: CC-BY-SA 3.0.[2]


openrightsgroup – dropsafe

2021-11

I like Boing-Boing, I’ve read it for years. I’ve met Cory several times as part of my work to help the Open Rights Group. I am generally sympathetic to a lot of the posts which are posted there.

I like the blog.

So yesterday there was something in the BoingBoing twitterfeed – a Disney Winnie-the-Pooh, meant to mock Richard Dawkins for having posted something about the TSA doing the pointless things that the TSA do, viz: taking away harmless things from you at airports:

EXCLUSIVE: Photograph of Richard Dawkins at TSA screening point. pic.twitter.com/iMJAUpZAAa — Boing Boing (@BoingBoing) November 4, 2013

Yes Richard’s a brusque character and a pain in the arse as far as some people are concerned; but still this is a notable, useful and blatant piece of security theatre, about which BB has written at length.

I feel that the war on the war on terrorism should win over nerdy character assassination, so I tweeted my – relatively modest – thoughts about this, to be met with a reaction which I’d describe as “apparently puerile”:

Amazed that one moment @BoingBoing can be raging against "security theatre" and the next ridiculing someone for… http://t.co/shyxzfbdua — Alec Muffett (@AlecMuffett) November 4, 2013

@AlecMuffett aw, that's an unnecessarily harsh interpretation of a Winnie the Pooh JPG. — Boing Boing (@BoingBoing) November 4, 2013

@BoingBoing how would you describe and justify your intentions, then, please? — Alec Muffett (@AlecMuffett) November 4, 2013

@AlecMuffett a Winnie the Pooh JPG needs no justification. — Boing Boing (@BoingBoing) November 4, 2013

@BoingBoing Concur. Mocking a prime example of a victim of security theatre might do, though? — Alec Muffett (@AlecMuffett) November 4, 2013

Being ignored would have been more mature response than this, I’d even half expect that.

But that’s not the weird thing.

The weird thing is that I checked my Google Docs this evening to find that Mark Frauenfelder has shared with me a “public” Google Doc entitled:

“People who are disappointed with Boing Boing”

Screencap:

My name is not on it, there is no explanation why he has shared it with me. Does he expect me to edit myself onto it? Am I supposed to see it and understand that I and a handful of others are “alone” in our criticism? Is this some sort of shit-list? A list of uncool people?

I can only suppose in the light of the childishness of the exchange last night that to understand the intent I would have to reach into my memory of pre-pubescence.

What the fuck, Boing-Boingers? You’re meant to be the cool people – and, mostly, the hip ones too? Perhaps you’re a collective rather than an organisation, but this action of whomever many speaks ill of your brand.

[PDF]

People who are disappointed with Boing Boing – Google Drive
[END]

[1] URL: https://alecmuffett.com/article/tag/openrightsgroup
[2] URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

BoingBoing via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/alecmuffett/

You are viewing proxied material from magical.fish. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.