(C) Daily Yonder - Keep it Rural
This story was originally published by Daily Yonder - Keep it Rural and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



Mike Johnson is wrong: Millions could lose SNAP benefits under GOP bill, analysts find [1]

['Loreben Tuquero', 'May']

Date: 2025-05-29

The nonpartisan Urban Institute found that the work requirement expansion alone could lead to 5.4 million people losing some or all of their monthly SNAP benefits.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that, if enacted, 3.2 million fewer people per month on average would receive benefits over the next nine years, based solely on the bill’s provisions expanding work requirements.

The House-passed GOP bill that includes many of President Donald Trump’s policy priorities has multiple provisions that would change how Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits are distributed, including expanded work requirements and mandated state contributions.

As the Senate reviews the Trump administration-backed "big, beautiful bill," Republican lawmakers insist it will not reduce Americans’ benefits.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said the bill won’t affect the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, which helps low-income people buy food. An average of 42.1 million people participate in the program each month.

"We are not cutting SNAP," Johnson said in a May 25 episode of CBS News’ "Face the Nation." "We're working in the elements of fraud, waste and abuse. SNAP for example, listen to the statistics, in 2024, over $11 billion in SNAP payments were erroneous."

There were about $10.5 billion estimated improper SNAP payments for fiscal year 2023 — payments made in the wrong amount or that should not have been made — according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. That comes to about 11.7% of the program’s payments.

But the bill does more than tackle waste and fraud. Three detailed, independent analyses of the reconciliation bill found it would cut the number of program beneficiaries by millions of people.

Sign up for PolitiFact texts

When asked for comment, Johnson spokesperson Griffin Neal referred PolitiFact to the speaker’s full "Face the Nation" comments, in which he also said, "What we're doing is strengthening Medicaid and SNAP so that they can exist, so that they'll be there for the people that desperately need it the most, and it's not being taken advantage of."

Based on different provisions of the bill, analysts estimate roughly 1.3 million to 11 million people losing SNAP benefits. The Congressional Budget Office, Congress’ nonpartisan economic and budgetary analysts, projected that a provision that expands work requirements would lead to an estimated 3.2 million people losing SNAP benefits in a given month.

"If enacted, this would be by far the largest cut to food assistance in history," said Katie Bergh, senior policy analyst on the food assistance team at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank. The group’s analysis said the bill would cut federal funding for SNAP by about 30% altogether.



"We estimate that more than 2 million children live in low-income households that would lose SNAP entirely or see their food benefits substantially cut," Bergh said.

The average monthly SNAP benefit per person as of fiscal year 2024 was $187.54.

What does the bill say about SNAP?

Multiple provisions in H.R. 1, or the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," would affect SNAP.

For one, the bill would allow only citizens and lawful permanent residents to receive SNAP benefits. It would also freeze increases to the Thrifty Food Plan. That plan establishes the average cost of a nutritious, home-prepared meal and is used as the basis for calculating households’ maximum SNAP benefit amounts. By not allowing increases to the Thrifty Food Plan, households’ SNAP benefits are less likely to keep pace with retail prices and inflation, and would in effect become cuts.

The bill also expands work requirements for SNAP eligibility. Currently, able-bodied recipients ages 18 to 54 with no dependents must work 80 hours per month to obtain SNAP benefits. The bill would raise the upper age limit to 64 for people who don’t live with dependents and people who live with children ages 7 and older.

It also gives states less leeway to waive work requirements in areas with high unemployment rates, and it requires that they pay a share of SNAP benefit costs beginning in 2028. SNAP is currently fully funded by the federal government; under the bill, states would have to fund from 5% to 25% of SNAP costs, depending on their payment error rates. Error rates are calculated based on how accurately states determine eligibility and benefits.

Analysts say the bill cuts hundreds of billions of dollars from SNAP

In a May 22 letter, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the bill’s provisions would "reduce spending on SNAP by $285.7 billion" over the next nine years, from 2025 to 2034.

The office estimated that the bill’s work requirement expansion, coupled with the measure restricting states’ ability to waive work requirements, would lead to an average of 3.2 million people in a given month losing SNAP benefits in the same nine-year period..

As for states’ response to the newly mandated contributions, the CBO also estimated that "states collectively would reduce or eliminate benefits for about 1.3 million people in an average month" in the same period.

Allowing only citizens and lawful permanent residents to participate in SNAP would reduce $4 billion in spending, the office estimated.

Meanwhile, failing to increase the Thrifty Food Plan would bar increases to monthly SNAP benefits based on actual food prices and "reduce the federal government’s direct spending by $37 billion" from 2027 to 2034, the CBO said.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, based on its analysis published before the House passed the bill, had a higher estimate for the effect of the proposed work requirement expansion, saying it could cause nearly 11 million people to lose SNAP benefits. It said that SNAP’s "deepest cuts" would come from the federal government pulling back on its funding by 5% to 25% and demanding states supply that instead.

"If a state can’t make up for these massive federal cuts with tax increases or spending cuts elsewhere in its budget, it would have to cut its SNAP program (such as cutting eligibility or making it harder for people to enroll) or it could opt out of the program altogether, terminating food assistance entirely in the state," the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities’ analysis said.

The Urban Institute, a Washington D.C. think tank, in a May 21 analysis estimated a more limited effect from the proposed work requirement expansion, but it still said millions of families would be affected. That provision "would result in 2.7 million families and 5.4 million people losing some or all of their family’s SNAP benefits in a month, with an average loss of $254 per family per month," it said.

Our ruling

Johnson said the tax reform bill is "not cutting SNAP."

Analyses by the Congressional Budget Office, the Urban Institute and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities show that millions of people could be removed from SNAP if the bill is enacted.

We rate Johnson’s claim False.

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/may/29/mike-johnson/SNAP-reconciliation-bill-tax-cuts-food/

Published and (C) by Daily Yonder - Keep it Rural
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons CC BY-ND 4.0 International.

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/dailyyonder/