(C) Daily Kos
This story was originally published by Daily Kos and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .
Bill Clinton and the Hollowing Out of the Democratic Party [1]
['This Content Is Not Subject To Review Daily Kos Staff Prior To Publication.']
Date: 2025-07-30
Bill Clinton won in 1992 by just 43.0% of the popular vote. This plurality was due largely to the presence of Ross Perot, who garnered 18.9%. However, since Perot did not win any electoral votes, Clinton secured 370 electoral votes—a decisive victory.
Clinton entered the Democratic presidential primary as a dark horse, running against favorites such as Paul Tsongas and Jerry Brown, with Tom Harkin and Bob Kerrey also initially strong contenders. He finished fourth in Iowa, Harkin’s home state. In New Hampshire, Clinton came in second behind Tsongas with 24.8% of the vote—a strong showing despite scandals including the revelation of a 12-year affair with Gennifer Flowers and controversy over his Vietnam draft record. Though he had not campaigned in Iowa and placed second in New Hampshire, Clinton declared himself the “Comeback Kid,” a narrative the media readily embraced.
Clinton described himself as a New Democrat and championed a Third Way. He rejected traditional left-wing policies as well as Reagan-era neoliberalism, instead advocating a centrist neoliberalism that was pro-business and fiscally conservative, while promoting social policies that ranged from progressive to conservative. His administration appointed a historically diverse Cabinet and judiciary, including women, African Americans, and openly gay individuals. Firmly pro-choice, Clinton often framed abortion rights as “safe, legal, and rare.” On November 30, 1993, he enacted “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” intended as a compromise to allow closeted gay service members to remain in the military without discharge—though it later drew criticism. The same day, he signed the Brady Bill mandating background checks, and on September 13, 1994, he signed the 10-year Assault Weapons Ban (AWB)—a major gun control measure that was tragically not renewed.
On the other hand, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, signed the same day as the AWB, took a far harsher approach. It funded increased police presence, expanded the death penalty, and imposed longer prison sentences. The law incentivized prison construction and rewarded states that adopted “truth-in-sentencing” laws requiring violent offenders to serve at least 85% of their sentences. It allowed juveniles as young as 13 to be tried as adults in certain cases. It also instituted the federal “three strikes” law, mandating life sentences for repeat offenders of serious felonies, including drug crimes. Critics argue this bill contributed significantly to mass incarceration, disproportionately impacting communities of color.
On August 22, 1996, Clinton signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, effectively ending “welfare as we know it.” The reform imposed strict work requirements and time limits on benefits. The short-term harm was muted by a strong economy, which averaged 3.8% GDP growth under Clinton, with low inflation. The overall poverty rate fell from 15.1% in 1993 to 11.3% in 2000 (Source: U.S. Census Bureau). Black and Hispanic poverty rates also dropped. However, economic downturns exposed the reform’s fragility; during the Great Recession, poverty rose to 15.2%.
Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) on September 21, 1996, defining marriage federally as between a man and a woman. Though introduced by Republicans, it garnered broad bipartisan support, making it veto-proof. Clinton signed it despite earlier support for LGBTQ rights and later expressed regret. DOMA remained law for 20 years until the Supreme Court struck it down.
Clinton employed rhetoric emphasizing “School Uniforms” and “Youth Curfews” to signal social discipline, public safety, and moral responsibility. While not codified in legislation, these messages broadened his appeal as a centrist.
As an architect of globalism, Clinton championed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which took effect on January 1, 1994, eliminating most tariffs and trade barriers between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico to create one of the world’s largest free-trade zones. Though negotiated under Bush 41, Clinton embraced NAFTA enthusiastically. He supported the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995, advocating expanded global trade under WTO rules. He also normalized trade relations with China in 2000 and backed China’s WTO entry, integrating the country more fully into the global economy.
Economically, NAFTA boosted U.S. GDP and global competitiveness but came at a high cost to labor, particularly non-college-educated and unionized workers. Outsourcing to China and other nations further exacerbated manufacturing job losses. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. manufacturing jobs numbered about 14.1 million in 1993 and declined to approximately 12.75 million by June 2025. Clinton’s policies weakened the Democratic Party’s historic ties to the working class, reshaping its image to one favoring professional elites, Wall Street, and technocrats. While consumers gained from cheaper goods, workers bore the costs.
Clinton governed as a political chameleon. Though identifying as centrist, he governed left of center in most areas except trade during his first two years, as evidenced by a failed health care reform effort led by Hillary Clinton, a 1993 budget raising taxes on the wealthy, gun control legislation, and “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” which pleased few on either side. His embrace of right-of-center NAFTA alienated many on the Left and fueled Democratic disaffection in the Midwest and South. The 1994 midterm elections, propelled by the Republican “Contract with America,” resulted in Clinton losing both houses of Congress. Republicans gained a historic 54 seats in the House and 8 in the Senate, reflecting the enduring strength of Reaganism and a rightward shift in the American electorate.
After the midterms, Clinton adopted a more flexible, strategic ideological posture. He leaned left rhetorically on inclusion and opportunity, while moving right in policy execution on crime, welfare, and trade. Clinton used triangulation to outmaneuver both Republicans and Democrats—co-opting popular Republican issues like welfare reform and budget balancing while pulling his party toward the center and challenging traditional liberal orthodoxies. This repositioning made the Democratic Party electorally competitive but sowed long-term tensions with labor, minorities, and progressives. Notably, Democratic leaders from Clinton through Obama and Biden operated largely within Reagan-era parameters, aiming to temper rather than reverse them. It now appears Trump has broken Reaganism and replaced it with a far more divisive and authoritarian paradigm.
Clinton served alongside three Speakers of the House: Tom Foley (D–WA, 1993–1995), Newt Gingrich (R–GA, 1995–1999), and Dennis Hastert (R–IL, 1999–2001). Gingrich, architect of the Contract with America, was elected to Congress in 1978 and became Minority Whip in 1989. He led the Republican resurgence in 1994 through confrontational, ideological insurgency and became Speaker in 1995. Gingrich’s combative style culminated in two government shutdowns—in late 1995 (five days) and early 1996 (21 days)—aimed at forcing Clinton to capitulate. Though Clinton outmaneuvered Gingrich politically, he ultimately signed welfare reform after vetoing earlier bills and cooperated on a balanced budget.
Gingrich oversaw the launch of Clinton’s impeachment process after the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke in January 1998, supporting investigations led by Independent Counsel Ken Starr and the House Judiciary Committee. On October 8, 1998, the House authorized a formal impeachment inquiry (258–176 vote) on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. Despite the controversy, Democrats gained five seats in the 1998 midterms—defying the typical presidential party losses—and Gingrich resigned as Speaker and from Congress.
The impeachment diminished Gingrich’s standing, alienated the public, and triggered a Republican leadership crisis. Ironically, after resigning, it emerged that Gingrich had maintained a six-year extramarital affair with Callista Bisek, a congressional staffer 20 years his junior.
On December 19, 1998, the House impeached Clinton on perjury and obstruction of justice charges. The Senate acquitted him on both counts on February 12, 1999. Following impeachment, Clinton’s favorability soared to 73%, the highest of his presidency. Though it declined slightly, he ended his term at 66%.
Clinton’s presidency projected an image of pragmatic centrism, economic progress, and political moderation. Yet, it frequently obscured the underlying contradictions of neoliberal governance—the outsourcing of jobs, the expansion of mass incarceration, and the entrenchment of socioeconomic inequality. His strategy of triangulation blurred conventional ideological boundaries, contributing to a political climate in which rhetoric increasingly diverged from reality and performative politics became routine—defining features of hypernormalization. The administration’s carefully crafted narratives surrounding welfare reform, crime policy, and globalization fostered a perception of progress, even as many Americans faced deepening economic insecurity and social fragmentation. This hypernormalized landscape fueled cynicism and mistrust.
Bill Clinton emerged as a master of political adaptation—a centrist neoliberal who combined personal charisma with strategic compromise, triangulation with opportunism. His presidency marked a pivotal moment in modern American politics: the consolidation of Reagan-era market orthodoxy under a Democratic administration. Clinton’s legacy is deeply ambivalent. On one hand, he presided over sustained economic growth, reductions in poverty, and expanded cultural recognition for marginalized groups. On the other hand, he championed punitive crime policies, dismantled key elements of the welfare state, distanced the party from organized labor, and entrenched elite-driven globalization. Clinton did not merely respond to the political conditions of the 1990s; he actively shaped them.
While Clinton maintained a highly effective personal political brand, his leadership left the Democratic Party institutionally weakened, ideologically fragmented, and increasingly disconnected from its traditional working- and middle-class base. Under his influence, the party became more dependent on elite donors, aligned with professional-class values, and committed to a corporate-friendly policy agenda. This shift contributed to growing political alienation of parts of the Democratic base and helped lay the groundwork for the populist and conservative backlash that culminated in the rightward realignments of the 21st century, including the rise—and eventual reelection—of Donald Trump.
Day 184: days left to January 20, 2029: 1,278 days
[END]
---
[1] Url:
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/7/30/2335884/-Bill-Clinton-and-the-Hollowing-Out-of-the-Democratic-Party?pm_campaign=front_page&pm_source=trending&pm_medium=web
Published and (C) by Daily Kos
Content appears here under this condition or license: Site content may be used for any purpose without permission unless otherwise specified.
via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/dailykos/
