(C) Daily Kos
This story was originally published by Daily Kos and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



The Road Not Taken: Reconstruction and the American Betrayal of Democracy [1]

['This Content Is Not Subject To Review Daily Kos Staff Prior To Publication.']

Date: 2025-06-06

To put the changes from 1776 to 1861 into perspective, a few numbers help provide context. By 1861, 35 states and eight territories covered nearly all of the continental United States. According to the 1860 census, the white population had grown to 26.9 million, while 3.95 million people were enslaved. In contrast, Native American populations had declined to 340,000, with 50–60% forcibly removed from their ancestral lands. By this time, the hypernormalization of Native Americans had rendered genocide, land theft, forced removal, and cultural erasure not only acceptable to most Americans—but framed as benevolent or even righteous. Hypernormalization didn’t merely enable injustice; it made it invisible to the mainstream.

Slavery, too, had become hypernormalized—especially in the South. A constructed illusion propped up the belief that Black people were intellectually and morally inferior, naturally suited for physical labor, and better off enslaved. This narrative didn’t just justify slavery; it defined white supremacy by asserting white moral and intellectual superiority.

Yet enslaved people shattered these lies daily. They displayed extraordinary resilience, ingenuity, and humanity. Many were skilled artisans, farmers, educators, and builders. They maintained spiritual, musical, and familial traditions even under inhumane conditions. The myth of inferiority was never true—it was a strategic lie designed to rationalize centuries of subjugation, exploitation, and control.

Slavery was deeply embedded in the nation’s fabric: legal for over 240 years, upheld by the courts, central to the Southern economy, culturally reinforced, and reinforced by eight of the first fifteen U.S. presidents who were slave holders.

The 1860 presidential election was not a national referendum on the issue of ending slavery. Abraham Lincoln opposed its expansion but won only 39.8% of the vote. A majority of voters supported either maintaining or extending slavery. Lincoln pursued the Civil War to preserve the Union, not to end slavery. As he famously wrote to Horace Greeley in August 1862, “If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it....”

Emancipation came as a military and diplomatic strategy. Lincoln hoped freeing the slaves in the Confederacy would weaken the Southern war effort by triggering escape and rebellion while also deterring Britain and France—who had outlawed slavery—from backing the Confederacy. Following the Union’s strategic success at Antietam, Lincoln issued the Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation on September 22, 1862. It warned that enslaved people in rebelling states would be declared free if the Confederacy did not rejoin the Union. When they refused, the Final Emancipation Proclamation took effect on January 1, 1863—freeing slaves only in Confederate-held areas but not in the Border States loyal to the Union.

The Union victory in 1865 created an opportunity for transformative change. The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments—abolishing slavery, establishing citizenship and equal protection, and securing voting rights for Black men—were not just reforms. They were a moral reset and a radical reimagining of American democracy.

Reconstruction (1865–1877) began with lenient policies under President Andrew Johnson but shifted to Radical Republican control in Congress. For a brief and extraordinary window, Black Americans exercised political and civil rights. Roughly 2,000 Black men held elected office, from local councils to the U.S. Congress. Black communities built independent churches, newspapers, mutual aid societies, and schools. Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), such as Howard University (founded in 1867), laid the foundation for Black intellectual and cultural advancement.

The Freedmen’s Bureau, established in 1865, played a crucial role in facilitating the transition from slavery to freedom. Staffed largely by white Union officers, teachers, and missionaries from the North, the Bureau played a significant role in establishing thousands of schools. Between 1865 and 1870, the number of Black students increased from approximately 90,000 to 150,000 in nearly 2,700 schools. By 1880, Black literacy had risen from an estimated 10% in 1860 to about 30%—a remarkable gain achieved despite overwhelming adversity. (Source: https://thefreedmensbureau.org/)

By the early 1870s, Northern support for Reconstruction was fading. The Amnesty Act of 1872 restored political rights to many ex-Confederates. A national economic depression shifted attention away from civil rights to focus on economic recovery. Many white Northerners began to prioritize reconciliation with the South over justice for freed people. The Supreme Court, through rulings like United States v. Cruikshank (1876), undercut Black civil rights and weakened federal enforcement.

Reconstruction formally ended through the Compromise of 1877, which resolved a contested presidential election. To secure the presidency for Rutherford B. Hayes, Republicans agreed to withdraw federal troops from the South. Without this protection, white supremacists swiftly dismantled Black gains. Jim Crow laws institutionalized segregation and disenfranchised Black Americans through violence, fraud, and law.

The white backlash was fierce and coordinated. Southern whites cultivated the Lost Cause myth, claiming the Civil War was about states’ rights—not slavery—and that the Confederacy fought honorably. Paramilitary groups like the Ku Klux Klan and Red Shirts terrorized Black voters and Republican officials. Meanwhile, racial capitalism—a system profiting from the marginalization of Black people—reemerged through Black Codes, sharecropping, convict leasing, and economic suppression.

Reconstruction was a radical moment of possibility—a fork in the road where America might have finally lived up to its founding ideals. Instead, the nation reversed course. White supremacy was reasserted, and Black rights were buried under laws, violence, and willful national amnesia. For nearly a century, the brief freedoms won during Reconstruction were denied—until the Civil Rights Movement forced the passage of the Civil Rights Act (1964) and Voting Rights Act (1965).

Still, the racism of the Jim Crow era thrives today under hypernormalization because the systems, narratives, and behaviors that sustain inequality continue to appear normal—or even invisible. The quiet acceptance of unjust systems continues to obscure the truth and impede progress.

Reconstruction teaches us not only what was possible—but what was lost. It challenges us to ask what justice could still look like and whether we dare to choose the right fork this time.

PS: In the 85 years from 1776 to 1861, American colonial imperialism accelerated, growing from 13 colonies to 35 states and 8 territories. The original colonies accounted for a sliver of what would become the continental U.S. By 1861, almost all of the land was organized though not heavily settled in many areas. This includes reservations.

The white European population in 1776 was about 2.5 million. According to the 1860 U.S. Census, it had grown to 26.9 million.

In 1776 it is estimated that between 5% to 10% of Native Americans had been forcibly removed from their ancestral lands. By 1861, the number grew to between 50–60% of all Native Americans being either removed or confined to reservations. Native American removal would continue until 1890. Russell Thornton, in his 1987 book, “American Indian Holocaust and Survival: A Population History Since 1492,” estimated that there were 2 to 3 million Native Americans in 1776. By 1860, he estimated that the Native American population had decreased to 340,000—proof of genocide on a massive scale.

In 1776, there were 450,000 people who were enslaved. According to the 1860 U.S. Census the enslaved population had grown to 3.95 million (12.6% of total population in the census). Notably in 1860 there were also 488,000 Free African Americans with about 54% of living in the South, and 46% in the North.

By the eve of the Civil War, the movement for the abolition of slavery had increased, but it was still a minority opinion. Support for Native Americans existed, but it was minimal.

The 1860 presidential election functioned as a proxy for public opinion on slavery.

**39.8%: Abraham Lincoln (Republican): Opposed expansion of slavery into new territories.

**29.5%: Stephen Douglas (Northern Democrat): Supported “popular sovereignty” (let states/territories decide).

**18.1%: John Breckinridge (Southern Democrat): Supported federal protection of slavery.

**12.6%: John Bell (Constitutional Union): Avoided the issue entirely.

(Source: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/elections/1860)

Notably, the vote was not about ending slavery, but about whether or not to limit it. Combining the vote total of Douglas and Beckrenridge meant that 47.6% voted against limiting it.

Day 138: days left to January 20, 2029: 1,324 days

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/6/6/2326314/-The-Road-Not-Taken-Reconstruction-and-the-American-Betrayal-of-Democracy?pm_campaign=front_page&pm_source=more_community&pm_medium=web

Published and (C) by Daily Kos
Content appears here under this condition or license: Site content may be used for any purpose without permission unless otherwise specified.

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/dailykos/