(C) Daily Kos
This story was originally published by Daily Kos and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



Failed Writer's Journey: Random Opinions on Writing That Will Slightly Annoy People [1]

['This Content Is Not Subject To Review Daily Kos Staff Prior To Publication.']

Date: 2025-05-02

I’m too nice a guy to be anything other than slightly annoying, something I can say because hardly anyone who knows me in real life reads this. But I do have some opinions that run counter to some of the, let’s say mindset, in the writing community. So let us slightly irritate people in a manner that they can easily forget.

Most of the time your book is rejected, it is because it’s not good. A lot of writing advice points out that agents reject people for all sorts of reasons. The book is not marketable, it’s too close to something they already have, they just don’t like stories about space vampires running gin joints on mars (wait, need to write that down. Back in a second) no matter how good the writing. And all of that may in fact be true. But a lot of the time, the writing just isn’t good enough. And that is fine. No, it’s better than fine. I have written about this before, but no one ever got better by being told that they were good when they were not. And a lot of reassuring people that there are many reasons a book is rejected, while well meaning, can have the effect of stifling growth. That fact that I know I am a shitty writer helps me, I think, hopefully, improve. I know that I have things to work on, and the drives me to be better. No guarantee that I will ever be good enough to publish, mind you. But if I did not acknowledge my failings, I certainly would never have a chance.

Self-publishing, overall, does not have the quality of traditional publishing. I am not saying that all self-published books are bad. That is self-evidently not the case. Nor am I saying that all traditionally published books are good. That is, also, self-evidently not the case. I am saying that the lack of gatekeeping in self, or indie, publishing leads to more poor works. Gatekeepers do generally provide at sanity check on the quality level. It is easy to convince yourself that your own work is good enough, especially if you believe books are rejected for unclear or bad reasons (see point one). That way leads to putting out poor work. The pressure to put out several books a year probably also lowers the general quality — less time to polish usually means less polished works. I suspect that the people who do put out good works as self-published works do so because they have a group of people they trust to tell them when a book is crap and because they are very good editors themselves or hire good editors. Gatekeeping has its problems — too much racism, sexism, classism and timidity, for starters — but gatekeeping does help raise the overall level of quality, I think.

We shouldn’t call self-publishing indie-publishing. This might be my most pedantic opinion of all my opinions on anything. But traditional publishing has two tiers — the big five, and a host of smaller publishers, most of which come and go. Those smaller publishers are independent — indie — in that they serve all the functions of a publisher for the writer but are not beholden to corporate dictates. They can publish more based on their sense of good rather than the need to keep this quarter’s line going up. Self-publishing is not the same thing, in my opinion. As I talked about above, the lack of gatekeeping makes it its own thing, separate from what independent publishers do. And conflating the two seems like special pleading to me.

Romance should get more attention in the literary world. This is odd coming from me, since I do not like romance and do not read it, but romance is the single largest genre in publishing. Sure, a lot of it is crap, but Sturgeon’s Law applies: 90% of science fiction is crap — but 90% of everything is crap. Romance obviously speaks to something in people, given how much of it is read in this age when reading is lower than it has been for past generations. We should respect that something more. Jane Austin, after all, wrote romances. Somewhere in the romance aisle there could very well be another Jane Austin that the larger society knows nothing about because she is in the romance aisle. Seems silly to me.

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/5/2/2320079/-Failed-Writer-s-Journey-Random-Opinions-on-Writing-That-Will-Slightly-Annoy-People?pm_campaign=front_page&pm_source=more_community&pm_medium=web

Published and (C) by Daily Kos
Content appears here under this condition or license: Site content may be used for any purpose without permission unless otherwise specified.

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/dailykos/