(C) Daily Kos
This story was originally published by Daily Kos and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .
The Rise of Gaslighting – Dealing with Manipulative Tactics in Politics [1]
['This Content Is Not Subject To Review Daily Kos Staff Prior To Publication.']
Date: 2025-04-27
Gaslighting has emerged as a significant term in contemporary discourse, describing a form of psychological manipulation where the perpetrator attempts to make the victim doubt their memory, perception, or sanity. Gaslighting has assumed alarming proportions in politics, as politicians increasingly employ gaslighting to sway public opinion, manipulate narratives, and consolidate power.
The term ‘gaslighting’ came from the 1938 play ‘Gas Light’, and its film adaptations, in which a husband manipulates his wife into believing that she is losing her mind by subtly altering elements of their environment and then denying the changes when confronted. This concept has since transcended its theatrical origins to describe a broader range of manipulative behaviors. In politics, gaslighting involves the deliberate distortion of facts, denial of reality, and the creation of a false narrative intended to disorient the public. Politicians use these tactics to create confusion and dependence, where citizens are more likely to accept the manipulator’s version of reality.
There are several methods by which political gaslighting is foisted on an unwitting public.
One of the primary tactics is the outright denial of verifiable facts. Politicians might dismiss documented evidence, scientific data, or historical records as ‘false’ or conspiracy theories. This creates an environment where truth becomes subjective, and citizens are left questioning the validity of established information.
Another favorite tool of the political gaslighter is making contradictory statements, which create cognitive dissonance in their audience. By continuously shifting their position, they create confusion and uncertainty, making it difficult for people to form coherent opinions or challenge the inconsistencies.
A key strategy involves discrediting sources of information that contradict the gas lighter’s narrative. This includes attacks on the credibility of journalists, experts, or political opponents. By undermining the reliability of alternative viewpoints, gaslighters isolate their audience and reinforce their authority.
Gaslighters frequently exploit emotions, such as fear, anger, and resentment. By tapping into these feelings, gaslighters can divert attention from factual inconsistencies and rally support around a shared emotional response. This emotional manipulation can be particularly effective in polarized societies with deep and long-standing divisions.
Many of our contemporary political figures have become synonymous with gaslighting tactics.
U.S. President Donald Trump is often cited as a master of political gaslighting. Throughout his first term, and now, at around 100 days into his second term, he frequently dismisses critical media coverage as ‘fake news,’’ casts doubt on the integrity of the electoral process, and makes a constant string of contradictory or demonstrably false statements. One notable example is how he handled the COVID-19 pandemic, where he alternately downplayed the severity of the virus, promoted unproven treatments, and blamed other entities for the crisis.
Another well-known gaslighter is Russian President Vladimir Putin. He has employed gaslighting tactics to maintain control over his regime and influence international affairs. By denying involvement in incidents such as the poisoning of political opponents, the annexation of Crimea, and interference in foreign elections, Putin creates a cloud of uncertainty that hinders accountability. His ability to manipulate domestic and international narratives has cemented his image as a formidable political strategist.
Brazil's President Jair Bolsonaro has also used gaslighting to shape public perception and consolidate power. During his administration, he has downplayed the severity of the Amazon rainforest fires, dismissed the dangers of COVID-19, and attacked the credibility of scientific experts. By fostering doubt and confusion, Bolsonaro has been able to rally his base while deflecting criticism.
The rise of political gaslighting has profound implications for democratic societies. As trust in institutions erodes and public discourse becomes increasingly polarized, the very foundations of democracy are at risk.
Gaslighting undermines trust in the media, the judiciary, and other democratic institutions. When citizens are unsure of what to believe, they become more susceptible to manipulation and are less likely to hold leaders accountable. This erosion of trust can lead to apathy, disengagement, and a weakening of democratic norms.
The exploitation of existing societal divisions amplifies polarization and fosters an us-versus-them mentality. As individuals retreat into echo chambers and ideological silos, constructive dialogue, and compromise become more difficult. This polarization can lead to social unrest, as seen in many countries grappling with political and ideological divides.
The deliberate distortion of facts and denial of reality threaten the concept of objective truth. When political leaders manipulate information to suit their agenda, the line between truth and lie becomes blurred. This undermines citizens' ability to make informed decisions and weakens the foundations of democratic governance.
While gaslighters' tactics can be formidable, there are strategies that individuals can employ to recognize and combat these manipulative behaviors.
Critical thinking skills and media literacy are essential for navigating today’s complex information landscape. Question sources, seek out diverse viewpoints, and verify information. In this way, you can better discern truth from manipulation. Support the prioritization of educational initiatives that promote media literacy and critical thinking.
Supporting independent journalism and fact-checking organizations is crucial for countering disinformation. These entities play a vital role in holding leaders accountable and providing accurate information to the public, helping to maintain a robust and informed public discourse.
Engaging in respectful and constructive dialogue with others, even those with differing viewpoints, can help bridge divides and counteract polarization. Building relationships and fostering community understanding and collaboration can create a more resilient and informed citizenry.
Advocacy and activism can be powerful tools for challenging political gaslighters. By organizing, raising awareness, and demanding accountability, individuals can resist political manipulation and promote transparency and truth in government. Grassroots movements and advocacy organizations are critical in amplifying citizens’ voices and driving systemic change.
As citizens, it is our responsibility to remain vigilant, question narratives, advocate for truth in the face of political manipulation, and demand accountability for political malfeasance. Through education, engagement, and activism, we can build a political environment where truth prevails, trust is restored, and democracy thrives.
[END]
---
[1] Url:
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/4/27/2319100/-The-Rise-of-Gaslighting-Dealing-with-Manipulative-Tactics-in-Politics?pm_campaign=front_page&pm_source=latest_community&pm_medium=web
Published and (C) by Daily Kos
Content appears here under this condition or license: Site content may be used for any purpose without permission unless otherwise specified.
via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/dailykos/
