(C) Daily Kos
This story was originally published by Daily Kos and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



Wondering where all this Tariff Madness and General Chaos is Taking us? I Asked ChatGPT [1]

['This Content Is Not Subject To Review Daily Kos Staff Prior To Publication.']

Date: 2025-03-11

The Great Depression, which began in 1929, was primarily triggered by a combination of stock market speculation, banking failures, overproduction, and global interconnectedness. Tariffs, notably the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, exacerbated the depression by creating a trade war that reduced international trade, leading to economic contraction and escalating tensions between countries.

Donald Trump’s tariffs during his presidency, particularly his trade war with China, bear some resemblance to the protectionist measures that contributed to the Great Depression. However, it’s crucial to understand how the global context, economic structures, and political dynamics have changed since the 1930s, making a direct comparison difficult but still instructive.

Likely Scenario of Trump’s Destabilizing Tariffs and Autocratic Tendencies

Tariffs as a Political Tool: Trump used tariffs as a tool to enforce his “America First” policy, particularly targeting China, Mexico, and the European Union. His tariffs were meant to address trade imbalances, protect American industries, and punish perceived unfair trading practices. However, such protectionist policies often lead to retaliatory tariffs, which can reduce the flow of goods and services between countries, increasing costs for consumers and businesses. This could destabilize international supply chains, lead to inflation, and ultimately slow down economic growth. Impact on Allies and Open Markets: Trump’s foreign policy often sidelined traditional allies (like NATO members, Japan, and the European Union), and his disdain for multilateral agreements (such as the Paris Climate Agreement and the Iran nuclear deal) further strained relationships. By reducing support for international trade agreements, Trump's policies could encourage autocratic regimes and states with closed economies, which undermines the open market system that the global economy relies on. Autocratic Support: Trump’s approach to governance, particularly his admiration for autocrats (such as Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping), raised concerns that his foreign policy might contribute to the erosion of democratic norms and values. This could destabilize global geopolitical relations, especially if authoritarian regimes grow emboldened, undermining democratic institutions and principles that support global cooperation and market access.

Chances of a Prolonged Depression

While it’s challenging to predict a full-scale depression in the modern era, several factors suggest that a prolonged economic downturn could occur, though it may not unfold exactly as it did during the Great Depression:

Globalization vs. Isolationism: The global economy is far more interconnected today than in the 1930s. While tariffs and trade wars have significant effects on specific industries, the extent to which the global market has diversified reduces the likelihood of a global depression from tariffs alone. However, sustained protectionism could significantly hinder global trade, leading to economic slowdowns. Technological and Economic Flexibility: The modern economy benefits from technological advancements, capital flows, and greater consumer access to information. These factors provide flexibility and adaptive capacity that did not exist in the 1930s. For instance, central banks and governments have more tools, such as monetary policy and fiscal stimulus, to prevent a downturn from becoming a prolonged depression. The rise of digital economies and tech-driven industries also offers a cushion against traditional industrial slowdowns. Retaliation and the Role of International Institutions: If the U.S. under Trump or another president continued with destabilizing tariffs, countries could retaliate by imposing their own tariffs, further escalating trade tensions. However, unlike in the 1930s, today’s international institutions (such as the World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund) have mechanisms to mediate trade disputes, and there is a greater emphasis on diplomatic engagement. Rising Nationalist and Protectionist Sentiments: As seen in the U.S. under Trump and in other countries, rising nationalist and populist sentiments can fuel protectionism. If this trend continues globally, a slow-moving but steady economic fragmentation could occur, pushing countries into autarky or regional trading blocs, reducing the openness and cooperation of the global economy.

How It Could Play Out

Initial Economic Shock: If the U.S. were to initiate widespread tariffs, especially on major trading partners like China or the European Union, the immediate effects would likely include higher consumer prices, strained business relations, and supply chain disruptions. Companies would face higher costs for imported goods and raw materials, leading to inflation and potentially slower economic growth. Retaliation and Escalation: Countries targeted by U.S. tariffs would likely retaliate, leading to a tit-for-tat escalation. The world could see a spiral of protectionist measures, with countries increasingly turning to domestic production rather than global trade. This would hurt both developing and developed countries that rely on exports and imports for economic stability. Stagnation or Recession: If the trade war drags on and confidence in global trade falters, the world could see economic stagnation or recession. This could hit certain industries (like manufacturing and agriculture) particularly hard, as they are dependent on international trade for both supplies and markets. Global Supply Chain Reconfiguration: In response to tariffs, global supply chains might reconfigure, with businesses seeking alternatives to China or other targeted countries. However, this would not necessarily mean a return to the pre-2008 global trading environment. Instead, it might lead to a more fragmented and regionalized system, which could slow down global growth over time. Political Instability: If economic stagnation persists, political instability could increase, with more populist and protectionist leaders gaining power worldwide. Autocratic regimes might gain strength, and global democratic institutions could weaken, leading to further geopolitical instability. Long-Term Economic Transformation: In the long term, the global economy might gradually adjust to a more fragmented and protectionist world. However, this would come at the cost of growth and innovation that often emerge from open markets and international collaboration. New trade routes, alliances, and economic systems could emerge, but the global economic order would likely look very different from what it is today.

Conclusion

While the chances of a full-blown depression resulting directly from Trump’s tariffs are lower due to modern economic structures and institutions, prolonged trade tensions and autocratic tendencies could lead to significant economic stagnation, instability, and global fragmentation. The world would likely witness an economic slowdown, potentially exacerbated by a shift away from global cooperation, increasing costs for consumers, and political turmoil. However, a deep, sustained depression on the scale of the 1930s remains less likely, though the global economy would undoubtedly face serious challenges.

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/3/11/2309418/-Wondering-where-all-this-Tariff-Madness-and-General-Chaos-is-Taking-us-I-Asked-ChatGPT?pm_campaign=front_page&pm_source=more_community&pm_medium=web

Published and (C) by Daily Kos
Content appears here under this condition or license: Site content may be used for any purpose without permission unless otherwise specified.

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/dailykos/