(C) Daily Kos
This story was originally published by Daily Kos and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



WriteOn: Plotter vs. Pantser, Methodological vs. Intuitive [1]

['This Content Is Not Subject To Review Daily Kos Staff Prior To Publication.', 'Backgroundurl Avatar_Large', 'Nickname', 'Joined', 'Created_At', 'Story Count', 'N_Stories', 'Comment Count', 'N_Comments', 'Popular Tags']

Date: 2023-05-25

It’s time for a quick reminder that writing advice is personal. We’re all different people, with different ways of thinking, and writing is crystallizing those thoughts into words. Since we think differently, what works for one may not work for another. This might be useful, it might not, but it’s an interesting topic for thinking about writing. I think.

(I also still can’t believe that the video series is three years old, and somehow I missed it entirely for three years. It’s probably time to widen my inputs again.)

Here’s the playlist for Ellen Brock’s “Four Types of Novel Writers”:

There’s a 20 minute overview, and four half-hour videos, one per type. For authors still figuring out their process, it’s probably worth watching the first video.

Her four types are:

Intuitive Pantser: no plotting, no planning of the first draft; intuitive sense of the story flow while writing/editing

Methodological Pantser: needs planning/method, but the story needs to grow and develop as they work

Intuitive Plotter: needs to plan the first draft, but does so off gut feeling

Methodological Plotter: plan first draft thoroughly before writing

After hearing her descriptions and listening to the advice for all four types, I’m probably a Methodological Pantser.

As I’ve tried to find a viable process for me, I’ve experimented with strong outlining. The more detailed the outline, the more likely I am to completely lose interest in the project. All the fun of discovery has been wrung out of the story. However, I do have to know roughly what I’m trying to do. The most successful projects didn’t have outlines, but instead each had a synopsis, some character plans, and where the conflict points were.

I’d already come to the conclusion that separating plot/story development and writing, the way I’ve approached NaNoWriMo in the past, is slower. Some of the easiest planning has been where I had a scene spark in the synopsis, then sketched it out, and it clicked. Or, sketching it out, and it very obviously wasn’t going to work.

So when some of her advice for this type mirrored what I’d figured out on my own, it clicked. And the rest of the advice seemed pretty sound. I’ll be trying it out while I tackle some revision that’s really ground me down.

The specifics I’m looking at trying out are: “start editing as soon as you’re ready”, “avoid using the wordcount as a measure of success”, “doing something (anything!) is better than getting stuck”, and “embrace the chaos”. I think the latter is where I’ve been hung up the most, of late. “I should be working on [X], because that’s the next ‘step’, even though [Y] is what my fingers are trying to do on the keyboard.”

In fact, I’m probably going to simply (hah!) rewrite this whole story from scratch, using what I learned from the first draft as a guide of what I want, rather than try to revise it into shape. I’d already half decided to do it, but “embrace the chaos” is giving me a surprising amount of permission.

Happy (chaotic) writing!

Exercise/challenge: This doesn’t inspire a specific challenge, so instead I will borrow from vss365 again: “dappled” (“Shade-dappled pavements / Sunbeams playing hide and seek / Blossoms frolicking”, image in the tweet.)

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/5/25/2171274/-WriteOn-Plotter-vs-Pantser-Methodological-vs-Intuitive

Published and (C) by Daily Kos
Content appears here under this condition or license: Site content may be used for any purpose without permission unless otherwise specified.

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/dailykos/