(C) Daily Kos
This story was originally published by Daily Kos and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



Stranger than Fiction [1]

['This Content Is Not Subject To Review Daily Kos Staff Prior To Publication.', 'Backgroundurl Avatar_Large', 'Nickname', 'Joined', 'Created_At', 'Story Count', 'N_Stories', 'Comment Count', 'N_Comments', 'Popular Tags']

Date: 2023-03-12

Wouldn't it be great to make fun of Pure Logic Spock?

This is about the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory (HU)

For most people, making fun of Logical thinking is rewarding. It is comforting to repeat to ourselves “true and tried” truths….Logical Thinking is tiring… it is thinking, after all.

In reality, we all enjoy what is called “Confirmation Biases.”

Anything that confirms what we “already know” is pleasant...:) That is how Russian Propaganda washed the brains of 39% of the US Population.

We have been told that Einstein was right… that Relativity is the cornerstone of Physics and our understanding of the Universe. Well, that can be correct (some aspects of Relativity might be the cornerstone of Physics and our understanding of the Universe), yet, Einstein could be wrong.

Whenever we were told that Einstein was right again, nobody told us that the new test tested the same local prediction that all the prior tests tested.

Local predictions are predictions associated with the behavior of matter (e.g. Mercury Perihelion Precession Rate, Neutron Spinning Rate Decay, Gravitational Time Dilation) or light (e.g., Gravitational Lensing) under the influence of a single gravitational source.

I wrote another article before and had comments expressing people’s need to feed their confirmation bias. I proposed a new model for Matter based on having particles made directly from shape-shifting, spinning in 4D, deformations of space (not spacetime).

In this model, the electron, proton, positron, and antiproton were different phases of the same construct. Charge was mapped to space dilation or space stretching, and it would be relative since the whole Universe would synchronously (in Absolute Time terms) tunnel from phase to phase while spinning in 4D.

People told me this kind of article is inappropriate for DailyKos’ readers. Well, I am an optimist and believe everyone should have a chance to see the Universe in simple, logical, and understandable terms. Nobody knows who will read this article.

This concept is called the Fundamental Dilator — a coherence between stationary states of deformation of space. It is represented by the figures below:

Here you can see the representation of four fundamental particles (they are fundamental in my theory — the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory or HU).

The first ball in the sequence defines which phase is in-phase with our universe. The orientation of the lettering describes the orientation of the phase with respect to our 3D hyperspherical Universe. One considers that the “height” along the direction perpendicular to our 3D Universe is very small, so when the phase is perpendicular to our Universe, the footprint (or cross-section) is close to zero. Interaction is proportional to the footprint.

This means that interaction (or Absolute Time) is quantized. I mentioned Absolute Time because the tunneling and spinning are timed by ABSOLUTE TIME.

You might find this strange since Einstein told us that Time is Relativity.

Logical Thinking would have also told you that Einstein was wrong about that since we time our Universe in Absolute Terms. The velocity of our Galaxy does not determine the Universe’s age. Even if velocity were relevant, what would be the preferential reference frame used?

That is another one of Einstein’s mistakes. He claimed that there was no preferred Inertial Reference frame, and yet, we know we can tell our Absolute Velocity with respect to the Cosmic Microwave Background.

THE UNIVERSE IS STROBOSCOPIC!!!

Notice that all four fundamental particles are just phases of the same coherence. It is not unlike dancers in a Discotheque under the strobe light.

If the strobe light is timed properly such that its frequency is half of the tunneling frequency (remember the spin half quantization), we would only see the " flush " phases with the Universe.

So, here you can see the beginning of Quantum Mechanics. The model for particles has a natural quantization between spinning and tunneling.

If you are extremely Logical, you might question HEY. WHAT ABOUT THE PHASE?

The phase of all Fundamental Dilators was set at the end of the Big Pop Cosmogenesis when the Universe was created.

Since I proposed that Particles were made directly and simply from deformed space, the Universe can be created just by using the Heisenberg Principle upon a quantum system composed of metric and dimensionality.

At the end of the partial recombination of the hyperspherical metric fluctuation, only two layers are left: the Inner Dilation Layer (IDL) and the Outermost Contraction Layer (OCL).

The IDL pushes the OCL and creates a Blackholium (hyperspherical-shell-shaped Black Hole). Further expansion leads to a phase transition where the Blackholium becomes a Neutronium (hyperspherical-shell-shaped Neutron Star).

Notice that those phases of the Universe have the whole universe filled with matter and at very low temperatures — the opposite of what the Big Bang Model proposes.

My theory derives the Laws of Nature from the Fundamental Dilator paradigm for matter, the Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe (LEHU) paradigm, and the Quantum Lagrangian Principle (QLP).

The theory is inherently “relativistic,” “covariant,” and Quantum Mechanical. “Relativistic” is within quote marks because HU is based upon an Absolute Reference frame, Absolute Time. The locus of the Universe at any given time (a hyperspherical shell locus) is the Absolute Reference Frame.

This is the LEHU (lightspeed expanding hyperspherical universe topology). Notice that the locus where all matter in the universe is expands at the speed of light (4D radius increases at the speed of light).

Here you see yourself at position A, looking into the sky and seeing the photons emitted by a galaxy at position B when the Universe was smaller (smaller 4D radius), denser, and more homogeneous.

It is easier to think about the Universe if one just considers 2D cross-sections:

The two circles represent two 2D cross-sections.

The all-space cross-section (x-R) includes one spatial dimension (or direction) x and one perpendicular spatial dimension (the radial direction R).

The spacetime cross-section (x-Phi) includes one spatial dimension (or direction) x and one perpendicular temporal dimension that has been multiplied by c (the cosmological time direction Phi).

Notice the existence of a LOCAL HOMOLOGY between LEHU and Minkowski Spacetime. That is shown clearly in the inset. The inset emphasizes that the circle becomes a hyperplane, and the proper reference frames of Special Relativity are recovered.

This should be enough to assure you that HU can replicate ALL LOCAL SUCCESSES OF RELATIVITY.

The reason is simple, Schwarszchild Metric can be recovered from geodesics acting upon a modified Minkowski spacetime metric under the constraints of a weak gravitational field, nothing else in the Universe and geodesics would asymptotically recover Keplerian Dynamics.

In other words, LOCAL SUCCESSES DO NOT REQUIRE EINSTEIN’S EQUAITONS.

So, Einstein’s successes can be detached from Relativity and based on Minkowski Spacetime and the Geodesics Paradigm (geodesics in spacetime return Keplerian Dynamics).

WHY WOULD ANYONE TACKLE THE BELOVED DR. EINSTEIN?

Nobody (I certainly would not) would fight Einstein’s ideas if there was another path.

Einstein’s theory is BEAUTIFUL… That said, Beauty is not everything.

Did I face obstacles in defending my ideas?

YES. Journals withdraw my articles from the peer-review process without providing any reason.

My postings to Einstein’s World...:) were summarily rejected.

That is expected since people go to Einstein’s World for comfortable confirmation bias.

What do scientists think about this?

Anyone who is not a member of Einstein’s Personality Cult knows since 1987 that Einstein’s General Relativity (under the reincarnation of L-CDM) is wrong.

In 1987, Kapahi, Sandage

Kapahi, V. K., Kulkarni, V. K., & Subrahmanya, C. R. (1987). On the Interpretation of the Observed Angular-Size-Flux-Density Relation for Extragalactic Radio Sources. J. Astrophys.Astr, 8, 33–50.

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/3/12/2157613/-Stranger-than-Fiction

Published and (C) by Daily Kos
Content appears here under this condition or license: Site content may be used for any purpose without permission unless otherwise specified.

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/dailykos/

You are viewing proxied material from magical.fish. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.