(C) Daily Kos
This story was originally published by Daily Kos and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .
Pregnant? Don't want to be? Here's what men can do to you in Texas [1]
['This Content Is Not Subject To Review Daily Kos Staff Prior To Publication.', 'Backgroundurl Avatar_Large', 'Nickname', 'Joined', 'Created_At', 'Story Count', 'N_Stories', 'Comment Count', 'N_Comments', 'Popular Tags']
Date: 2023-03-10
According to Gonzalez-Ramirez’ report:
Silva alleges that his ex-wife learned she was pregnant in July 2022 and concealed it from him. Notably, court records show she had filed for divorce two months earlier, in May 2022, although it wasn’t finalized until February 2023. According to photos of his ex-wife’s purported text messages, which were included in the lawsuit, she told the defendants: “I know either way he will use it against me. If I told him before, which I’m not, he would use it as [a way to] try to stay with me. And after the fact, I know he will try to act like he has some right to the decision.”
But it’s not really important what this couples’ “situation” was. We can speculate, we can be judgmental, sympathetic, or salacious, depending on our preconceptions. But ultimately, whatever we or anyone else may “think,” it’s not really important what emotions, past history, or anything, really, motivated these people in their relationship. Functional or dysfunctional, abusive or consensual, we just don’t know. Because, frankly, it’s none of our business.
The only reality is that Mr. Silva’s “ex” did not believe it was in her best interests to become pregnant with this man’s child, and that her pregnancy was unintentional and unwanted. She wanted an abortion, desperately, and she sought out her friends to help her get one.
As reported by Eleanor Klibanoff for the Texas Tribune:
The friends texted with the woman, sending her information about Aid Access, an international group that provides abortion-inducing medication through the mail, the lawsuit alleges. Text messages filed as part of the complaint seem to show they instead found a way to acquire the medication in Houston, where the two women lived. A third woman delivered the medication, the lawsuit alleges, and text messages indicate that the wife self-managed an abortion at home.
Mr. Silva obviously disagreed with his ex-wife’s decision. His motives may be malevolent, they may be heartfelt. They may, in his view, be “Christian” or what he thinks” is “right,” or they may be just manifested out of pure malice and resentment against his “ex.” She may care for him, she may hate him, or she (as seems likely here) may never want to see him again.
Again, we don’t know. The point is, it doesn’t matter.
In states like Texas, subject to Republican anti-abortion laws, egged on by a Republican majority Supreme Court, it is the man -— and only the man --who has the right of punishment. As Klibanoff reports, “The lawsuit alleges that assisting a self-managed abortion qualifies as murder under state law, which would allow Silva to sue under the wrongful death statute.”
So under Texas law, if the man wants whoever he has impregnated to give birth -— whatever the circumstances, no matter how horrid or unintended — he can sue anyone who helps her terminate that unwanted pregnancy under the terroristic threat of that state’s criminal laws. Even to the point — as was done in this case — of holding them liable for the fetus’ “wrongful death.” And, as Mr. Silva’s case demonstrates, he will have the full power of the state behind him. Texas, like other states, have stopped just short of criminally charging women who have an abortion, but men like Mr. Silva can see quite clearly see how the wind is blowing. His lawsuit reportedly seeks $1,000,000 in “damages.”
He has all the power, and the woman has none. Backed by the imprimatur of the state, the purpose of the suit is intimidation, pure and simple, as called out by pro-choice organizations:
“This is an outrageous attempt to scare people from getting abortion care and intimidate those who support their friends, family, and community in their time of need," Autumn Katz, a lawyer with the Center for Reproductive Rights, said Friday in a statement. “The extremists behind this lawsuit are twisting the law and judicial system to threaten and harass people seeking essential care and those who help them.”
So, yes, I would suggest that this is not a place Texas women, or anyone who becomes pregnant in that state, would want to be in. I would also suggest that this is not a place that any sane parent would want their want their daughters to be in. In fact, I would expect them to be horrified at being put into this position.
And I’d suggest they use whatever power they have to vote out the people who made it possible.
Yes, elections have consequences. They can wreck or destroy peoples’ lives. And for anyone who votes Republican --in Texas or in any state dominated by Republicans who pass these types of misogynistic laws -- this is an example of those consequences.
[END]
---
[1] Url:
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/3/10/2157426/-Pregnant-Don-t-want-to-be-Here-s-what-men-can-do-to-you-in-Texas
Published and (C) by Daily Kos
Content appears here under this condition or license: Site content may be used for any purpose without permission unless otherwise specified.
via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/dailykos/
