(C) Daily Kos
This story was originally published by Daily Kos and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



The "Updates To Articles Go At The Top" formatting decision: let's talk about that (backwards) [1]

['This Content Is Not Subject To Review Daily Kos Staff Prior To Publication.', 'Backgroundurl Avatar_Large', 'Nickname', 'Joined', 'Created_At', 'Story Count', 'N_Stories', 'Comment Count', 'N_Comments', 'Popular Tags']

Date: 2022-11-14

Idea Bad A It's Think I.

Part 4: In conclusion, this decision leads to poorly-arranged content, and badly damages the ability to read any "Live Follow-Along" articles (like Brandi Buchman, whose very important court room coverage of the Oathkeeper's Seditious Conspiracy trial is being badly-mangled to near-unreadability by this website’s current setting / configuration / arrangement that puts New Updates at the top).

Part 3: And if you ever come back to an article later, you have to try to actually READ those tiny timestamps, try to remember which timestamp you had previously looked at, and scroll up and down trying to find the NEWEST timestamp which is AFTER the last one you saw.

Part 2: It requires people who come to an article to scroll to the bottom of the article, then scroll upwards, hunting for tiny timestamp-and-diving-lines along the way to see where you should start reading from.

Part 1: I think the "Article Updates Go At The Top" is a terrible website / article / formatting convention.

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2022/11/14/2136096/-The-Updates-To-Articles-Go-At-The-Top-formatting-decision-let-s-talk-about-that-backwards

Published and (C) by Daily Kos
Content appears here under this condition or license: Site content may be used for any purpose without permission unless otherwise specified.

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/dailykos/