(C) Common Dreams
This story was originally published by Common Dreams and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta [1]

[]

Date: 2025-08

05/28/2019 Application (18A1224) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 26, 2019.

09/11/2019 Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 25, 2019.

10/07/2019 Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 25, 2019.

12/11/2019 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.

01/13/2020 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.

01/21/2020 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.

02/14/2020 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.

02/24/2020 The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

12/09/2020 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.

01/08/2021 Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 19-255 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.

01/08/2021 Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-251. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 19-251. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”

03/01/2021 Amicus brief of Philanthropy Roundtable, Independent Women's Forum, and People United for Privacy Foundation not accepted for filing. (March 02, 2021 - corrected brief to be submitted.)

03/01/2021 Amicus brief of The Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. not accepted for filing. (March 02, 2021) (efiling will be resubmitted)

03/12/2021 SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, April 26, 2021. VIDED.

03/12/2021 Application (20A148) granted by Justice Kagan to file respondent's consolidated brief on the merits in excess of the word limit. The brief may not exceed 15,000 words. VIDED.

03/15/2021 Record requested.

03/15/2021 The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.

03/24/2021 Brief of Matthew Rodriquez, Acting Attorney General of California not accepted for filing. (Corrected and reprinted brief submitted - March 25, 2021)

03/30/2021 CIRCULATED

03/31/2021 Amicus brief of Legal Historians not accepted for filing. (April 06, 2021 - Corrected brief submitted.)

03/31/2021 Amicus brief of Campaign Legal Center, et al. not accepted for filing. (Corrected brief submitted)

04/05/2021 Motion of petitioners for divided argument is DENIED; motion of petitioners for enlargement of time for oral argument is GRANTED, and the time is allotted as follows: 30 minutes for petitioners, 10 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General, and 30 minutes for respondent.

04/05/2021 Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.

04/24/2021 Motion of Thomas More Law Center to file a reply brief out of time GRANTED.

04/26/2021 Argued. For petitioners: Derek L. Shaffer, Washington, D. C. For United States, as amicus curiae: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Acting Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Aimee A. Feinberg, Deputy Solicitor General, Sacramento, Cal. VIDED.

07/01/2021 Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, except as to Part II– B–1. Kavanaugh and Barrett, JJ., joined that opinion in full, Alito and Gorsuch, JJ., joined except as to Part II–B–1, and Thomas, J., joined except as to Parts II–B–1 and III–B. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Gorsuch, J., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer and Kagan, JJ., joined. VIDED.

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/americans-for-prosperity-foundation-v-becerra/

Published and (C) by Common Dreams
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 3.0..

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/commondreams/

You are viewing proxied material from magical.fish. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.