(C) Common Dreams
This story was originally published by Common Dreams and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .
More Than Proclamations: Why Sanctuary Cities are Sacred Spaces [1]
['George Cassidy Payne']
Date: 2024-11-26 07:08:06.292000+00:00
More Than Proclamations: Why Sanctuary Cities are Sacred Spaces George Cassidy Payne Follow 5 min read · Nov 26, 2024 -- Listen Share
There are over 200 so-called “sanctuary cities” in America today. What does it mean to be one of them? This question invites diverse opinions and perspectives. As a philosopher and theologian, I see sanctuary cities as more than just places of legal refuge and protection. They are, in a deeper sense, sacred spaces — akin to holy rooms within a larger building, where individuals may enter only if they are willing to humble themselves before a power greater than themselves. To be a “sanctuary city” is to be a site of reverence, a place where all people are equal before the Creator.
In this context, sanctuary cities offer more than a geographical claim. They challenge us to look past a person’s nationality and recognize their humanity. They call us to prioritize their place of residence, viewing them as global citizens, not by their place of birth. In the sanctuary, people are treated with radical respect; here, no one has the right to harm another without their consent, nor to judge anyone based on their skin color, accent, citizenship status, or nation of origin.
Sanctuary cities are sacred spaces — not because they are free from conflict or controversy, but because they are a declaration of egalitarian love and dignity in a world that often seeks division. However, the concept of the sanctuary itself is not without challenges. Some may question whether human life is inherently sacred, or if our understanding of it is rooted in cultural constructs or religious dogma that are not universally shared.
Critics from secular humanist perspectives often argue that human life does not possess intrinsic sacredness. They suggest that life’s value is constructed through human experience, social agreements, and ethical systems, rather than through divine will. In this view, the sanctity of life is not absolute but a societal invention, shaped by empathy, justice, and shared human values. Furthermore, moral relativism contends that different cultures and individuals may hold different beliefs about the value of life, without one truth applying universally. From this standpoint, the very notion of sanctuary may be seen as an arbitrary moral construct, dependent on the cultural and legal contexts that define it.
Existentialist philosophy offers another critique, asserting that life, while meaningful to those who experience it, is inherently absurd and lacks an external or divine purpose. For existentialists like Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus, the idea that human life is sacred might seem limiting, as it could conflict with the radical freedom of individuals to define their own existence. From this perspective, the sacredness of life could be viewed as an external imposition, one that challenges personal autonomy and the freedom to shape one’s path.
There are also practical and ethical objections. Critics of the sanctity of life often point to real-world issues like overpopulation, resource scarcity, and environmental collapse. Some argue that elevating the sanctity of life to an absolute principle can result in unsustainable practices, especially in situations where survival is dependent on limited resources. This view suggests that to preserve the dignity of life, we must also recognize the ethical implications of how we interact with the planet and its people, and consider whether such a principle leads to greater harm or inequality.
Moreover, debates over euthanasia and the right to die challenge the idea that life is sacred in all circumstances. Advocates for physician-assisted suicide, for instance, argue that individuals suffering from terminal illnesses should have the autonomy to end their lives on their own terms. They contend that life should not be preserved at all costs, particularly when its continuation causes unnecessary suffering.
Yet, even with these counterarguments, sanctuary cities remain a powerful symbol of resistance against the tides of exclusion and fear. In response to the unchecked persecution of immigrants, migrants, and refugees by recent U.S. administrations, sanctuary cities have become a moral bulwark, a place where the values of equality, compassion, and human dignity are upheld in the face of growing division. The data is telling: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrests have sharply increased in some regions, including those of non-criminal immigrants; the effects have been felt nationwide. Sanctuary cities stand as a rebuttal to policies that seek to criminalize migration and create an atmosphere of fear and desperation.
As journalist Jamelle Bouie wrote, “This is all part of a larger strategy to create an atmosphere of fear and desperation for unauthorized immigrants. Sanctuary cities are more than simply a refusal to comply with federal policies. They represent the assertion of a higher moral law — one that acknowledges the humanity of every individual, regardless of their immigration status.
What if sanctuary cities were viewed as arcs of salvation, as vessels of mercy? What if these cities were seen not just as places where federal laws are resisted, but as spaces where a higher, universal ethic is honored? If sanctuary cities are parts of the building where one may not enter unless they are willing to humble themselves before a higher power, then they are, indeed, sacred spaces.
As the word “sanctuary” derives from the Latin sanctuarium, meaning “a holy place,” it suggests that these cities are more than mere political statements — they are profound declarations of human dignity. Sanctuary cities invite us to reflect on how we treat one another, how we acknowledge the sanctity of human life, and how we stand against forces that dehumanize others. It is not just about protecting vulnerable populations; it is about creating a space where equality, love, and justice reign.
Rochester, NY, stands proudly among these cities, offering a lasting legacy and a hopeful future for those who seek refuge. In embracing this declaration, we recognize that the true meaning of sanctuary transcends political or legal boundaries. It is a profound statement of humanity — a commitment to uphold the dignity of every person, regardless of their status. This is why sanctuary cities are sacred spaces: they are not just about where people can find refuge but about what we believe and honor as a society.
[END]
---
[1] Url:
https://medium.com/@icaj2000/more-than-proclamations-why-sanctuary-cities-are-sacred-spaces-7642eebf1c47
Published and (C) by Common Dreams
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 3.0..
via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/commondreams/
