(C) Common Dreams
This story was originally published by Common Dreams and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



The GOP Says It’s a Working-Class Party. Last Night’s Debate Exposed That Charade. [1]

['Ben Burgis', 'René Rojas', 'Bhaskar Sunkara', 'Jonah Walters', 'Bashir Abu-Manneh', 'Leif Weather', 'Cori Bush', 'Alex N. Press', 'Luke Savage', 'Branko Marcetic']

Date: 2023-12

Three years ago, “populist” Republican senator Josh Hawley tweeted, “We are a working class party now. That’s the future.” The next year, his colleague Ted Cruz announced that the future had arrived. “The Republican Party,” he said, “is not the party of country clubs” but “the party of hard-working, blue-collar men and women.” In the real world, neither Haley nor Cruz is even a cosponsor of the PRO Act, which would make it easier for workers to organize unions. Nor are any of their Republican colleagues. Marco Rubio, another senator who likes to preen as an economic populist, actually introduced a bill last year to legalize company unions. So the “party of the working class” schtick has always rung pretty hollow. But it’s striking that on stage at last night’s Republican debate, no one was even going through the motions.

Harsh Words for “Union Bosses,” None for Real Bosses South Carolina senator Tim Scott got the first question. He’d previously commented on the autoworkers strike by bringing up the “great example” set by Ronald Reagan in firing striking air traffic controllers. “You strike, you’re fired.” Scott was asked if that meant he’d fire the thousands of striking autoworkers. He admitted that as president he wouldn’t have the power to fire striking workers in the private sector — but immediately went on to say that he found it absurd that the autoworkers “want more benefits working fewer hours.” Rather than visiting a United Auto Workers picket line, Scott said, Joe Biden should be “on our southern border, working to close our southern border, because it is unsafe, wide open, and insecure.” If you take the rhetoric of Hawley and Cruz seriously, you’d expect the rest of the Republicans on stage to jump on that with denunciations of Scott for siding with bosses against workers. Instead, everyone seemed to have come with the kind of sound bites that would get standing ovations at the Chamber of Commerce. Former vice president Mike Pence said that, instead of being on “a picket line,” Biden should be on “an unemployment line.” Disenfranchisement enthusiast Vivek Ramaswamy said the workers should switch to “picket[ing] in front of the White House in Washington, DC” — not, mind you, to demand government intervention on behalf of their strike but to advocate deregulation of the energy industry. Former New Jersey governor Chris Christie’s advisors didn’t seem to have gotten the memo to prepare a line like this about the autoworkers, but later in the debate, he did have one on teachers’ unions. When he got a question about education, he managed to work in a line about how the “stranglehold” of political influence supposedly exercised by these unions wasn’t going to go away as long as “you have the president of the United Stated sleeping with a member of the teachers’ union.” As Jacobin editor Bhaskar Sunkara write s , the reference to First Lady Jill Biden “had all the crassness of a Trump line, but none of the political acumen.” Polls show that a crushingly large majority of the American public sides with the striking UAW workers. The closest anyone on stage came to reflecting popular opinion was Vivek Ramaswamy, vaguely expressing “a lot of sympathy” with rank-and-file workers — but even that comment was prefaced by saying that he and Tim Scott had “a common view” in not having much patience for “the union bosses.” Reality check: Workers don’t get to elect real bosses, but UAW “boss” Shawn Fain was directly elected by the membership. He was a reformer who ousted the leadership that had been running the union for decades. And the vote to authorize the strike against the Big Three automakers carried a margin of 97 percent to 3 percent. Trying to situate yourself as a friend of “the workers” while badmouthing the democratically elected “union boss” carrying out the will of 97 percent of the membership is absurd on its face.

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://jacobin.com/2023/09/gop-republican-presidential-debate-uaw

Published and (C) by Common Dreams
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 3.0..

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/commondreams/