(C) Common Dreams
This story was originally published by Common Dreams and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



Biden team gives nod to huge Alaska oil project, setting up climate fight [1]

['Timothy Puko']

Date: 2023-02-01

Listen Comment on this story Comment Gift Article Share

A key environmental assessment recommends that the Interior Department grant partial approval to a major oil drilling project on Alaska’s North Slope, known as Willow, setting the stage for one of the Biden administration’s most consequential climate decisions. Want to know how your actions can help make a difference for our planet? Sign up for the Climate Coach newsletter, in your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday. ArrowRight The report, made public Wednesday morning, is one of the administration’s final steps in resolving a years-long showdown between the federal government and ConocoPhillips about its legal right to drill one of the largest oil and gas developments on federal territory. The company controls oil leases in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, and the report’s findings may force the Biden administration to grant final approval to the project next month over intense pressure from climate activists, who say it flies in the face of the president’s pledges to reduce the country’s contribution to global warming.

The report — a legally required part of the permit process compiled by career staff based out of Alaska — determined that the “preferred alternative” would allow three well pads, down from the originally requested five. That matches preliminary recommendations the agency had put out this summer, and is in line with what company officials have publicly said they need at minimum to make the project worth the company’s investment.

Advertisement

But administration officials, in a separate news release, left the door open for potentially still rejecting the project. The Interior Department said it still has concerns about the greenhouse gas emissions caused by the project and impacts to wildlife and Alaska Native subsistence, even under the preferred alternative listed in the report, known as a final supplemental environmental impact statement, or SEIS.

“The preferred alternative is not a decision about whether to approve the Willow Project,” the department said. “The Department has substantial concerns about the Willow project and the preferred alternative as presented in the final SEIS.”

The Biden administration now has at least 30 days to mull that final decision on permitting the project, slated for the nation’s largest block of public land.

Advertisement

The company initially planned for five pads at the Arctic site, but the recommended alternative would remove pads from some of the most sensitive areas to reduce surface infrastructure that might harm bird nests and caribou migration. This alternative would result in smaller greenhouse gas emissions than the other drilling alternatives, causing roughly 9.2 million metric tons of carbon dioxide a year, according to the assessment’s estimates.

Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, who once fought the project as a member of Congress, now has the final decision on whether to approve it. Top White House climate officials are likely to be involved and potentially seek feedback from President Biden. Haaland has wide discretion, including the right to choose from other options or to mix and match options from the assessment. Those possibilities also include blocking one pad and deferring decisions on up to three more.

The administration has previously promised Alaskan leaders that it would make a final decision by the end of February. ConocoPhillips needs approval to start the project within weeks, while Arctic weather is still cold enough for the company to make the ice roads and ice platforms it builds on to drill through tundra. Missing that window would put off construction until the deep freeze returns next winter, opening the chance for court fights or other delays that may block Willow entirely.

Advertisement

Company leaders have also threatened to abandon the project if Haaland’s choice is too restrictive. A green light for any less than three pads would prevent Willow from being profitable enough to justify the company’s investment, given the high costs of such a remote project, they have said.

Alaska’s congressional delegation — backed by several local Native American tribes and organizations — has been lobbying the White House to give the company the approvals it wants, arguing that the $8 billion to $10 billion endeavor would bolster the nation’s domestic energy supplies and help enrich the state and local tribes. But the project is bitterly opposed by environmental groups, advocates for Alaskan wilderness and some locals, who say that its giant footprint threatens the president’s climate goals, wildlife — especially polar bears — and subsistence living in a remote part of the Arctic.

Willow would bring hundreds of miles of roads and pipelines — along with airstrips, a gravel mine and a large new processing facility — to the area’s pristine tundra and wetlands. There are only two existing drilling sites producing oil in the 23 million-acre reserve, both run by ConocoPhillips.

Advertisement

A ConocoPhillips official told investors in 2021 that the project could unlock 3 billion barrels of oil. Friday’s report estimates that over the three-decade life of the project, Willow would generate 629 million barrels of oil — up from the government’s earlier estimate of 586 million barrels.

Willow would extend ConocoPhillips’s footprint farther to the west across the North Slope, toward Teshekpuk Lake, the largest lake in the Alaskan Arctic.

The nearest town is Nuiqsut, where residents are divided about the project. Some say existing drilling has helped elevate the standard of living far above other Native Alaskan villages. But many residents still depend on hunting and whaling for subsistence, and fear more drilling pads and pipelines will push migrating caribou farther from the village, and further harm air quality.

Advertisement

In March, natural gas began leaking from the ground at Alpine, a neighboring ConocoPhillips facility. The leak caused ConocoPhillips to evacuate some 300 of its employees from the site and sparked panic in Nuiqsut, prompting several families to flee the area.

Willow was initially approved in the final year of the Trump administration, but in 2021, a federal judge blocked construction permits for the project, ruling that the government failed to assess the greenhouse gas impacts of burning the oil pulled from the ground.

GiftOutline Gift Article

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/02/01/alaska-willow-project-oil-drilling-climate/

Published and (C) by Common Dreams
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 3.0..

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/commondreams/

You are viewing proxied material from magical.fish. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.