(C) BoingBoing
This story was originally published by BoingBoing and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .
UK Law would force Wikipedia to unmask anonymous editors [1]
['Ellsworth Toohey']
Date: 2025-08-11
A new UK internet safety law could require Wikipedia to collect the real names and identities of its volunteer editors — a change that threatens the very way the free online encyclopedia works.
The Wikimedia Foundation just lost its court challenge to block these rules, which are part of Britain's Online Safety Act. While Wikipedia appears alongside social media giants as one of the internet's most-visited sites, it operates very differently: All its content is created by unpaid volunteers who often need to remain anonymous for their safety. A professor editing articles about Chinese politics, for example, or a scientist correcting COVID-19 misinformation could face real-world threats if their identities were exposed.
The court acknowledged this dilemma, recognizing Wikipedia's "significant value" as a knowledge resource viewed 15 billion times monthly. While rejecting Wikimedia's challenge, the judge warned UK regulators not to implement rules that would "significantly impede Wikipedia's operations." The question now is whether regulators will create special exemptions for Wikipedia's unique model.
"Our concerns on the looming threats to Wikipedia and its contributors remain unaddressed," said Phil Bradley-Schmieg, Lead Counsel at the Wikimedia Foundation. "We are taking action now to protect Wikipedia's volunteers, as well as the global accessibility and integrity of free knowledge."
Previously:
• The cryptid complications of Wikipedia's editing policies
[END]
---
[1] Url:
https://boingboing.net/2025/08/11/uk-law-would-force-wikipedia-to-unmask-anonymous-editors.html
Published and (C) by BoingBoing
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0.
via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/boingboing/
