(C) BoingBoing
This story was originally published by BoingBoing and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



Why is Red Dye No. 3 still in our food if it was banned for cosmetics in 1990? [1]

[]

Date: 2025-06-20

Red Dye No. 3 has been banned for use in cosmetics and topical drugs since 1990. So why is it still in our food? This video deep dives into Red 3, and the use of dangerous dyes in everyday products. Red 3 can cause some pretty unpleasant side effects, yet it's everywhere: in popular candy, drinks, and snacks. I've personally never given much thought to eating artificial dyes, but this video makes me want to be more cautious.



From YouTube:

"In 1990, the FDA banned the use of Red No. 3 in topical drugs and cosmetics. Their cited reasoning was that the color additive was "not shown to be safe," because when fed to rats, Red No. 3 was found to slightly increase the risk of thyroid cancer. Today, that same dye is still found in candy corn, ring pops, Pez, and nearly 3,000 other foods that we eat, which raises the question: If it's not safe to put on our skin … is it really safe to ingest? Many researchers, advocates, and now state lawmakers say no.

Last year, California passed a bill formally banning Red Dye No. 3 and several other additives from food in the state. The bill gives the food industry until 2027 to remove the additives from their products. The industry is already responding, with companies like Pediasure quickly removing the dye from their shakes.

The question remains, though: Where is the federal ban on Red No. 3 in food if the FDA deemed it unsafe for topical uses over 30 years ago?

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://boingboing.net/2025/06/20/why-is-red-dye-no-3-still-in-our-food-if-it-was-banned-for-cosmetics-in-1990.html

Published and (C) by BoingBoing
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0.

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/boingboing/