(C) BoingBoing
This story was originally published by BoingBoing and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .



An astronomer rates the accuracy of sci-fi spaceships [1]

['Gareth Branwyn']

Date: 2022-10-08

Given how fast and loose science fiction often is with the science part, it's always interesting to see what a real scientist says about what the fiction gets right and doesn't.

In this video, astronomer (and sci-fi fanatic) Michael Siegel looks at 21 different spaceships and rates them into 5 categories, from best to worst: Please Abduct Me, Enjoy the Ride, Not Great/Not Terrible, Fails at Max Q, and Blows Up on the Launch Pad.

Given the fan side of Michael, he also uses a "Rule of Cool" which allows some of his choices to override their scientific shortcomings. This allows for some fun and silliness, like the Doctor Who Tardis being a Please Abduct Me.

[END]
---
[1] Url: https://boingboing.net/2022/10/08/an-astronomer-rates-the-accuracy-of-sci-fi-spaceships.html

Published and (C) by BoingBoing
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0.

via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/boingboing/

You are viewing proxied material from magical.fish. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.