Stuck In Traffic #7
   by Calvin Stacy Powers �


   =================
   Darwin Award 1995

   Earlier this year, the Arizona Highway Patrol discovered a pile of
   smouldering metal smashed into the side of a mountain at the apex
   of a curve in a highway.  At first they thought it was the
   wreckage of a small airplane, but later decided it was a car,
   though they couldn't determine what sort of car it was because the
   car was mangled so badly.

   But during their investigation the story began to come out.  It
   seems that a man had somehow managed to get his hands on a
   solid-fuel rocket used to give heavy military transport planes an
   extra boost during take-off.  This fellow had driven his Chevy
   Impala out into the middle of the desert on a long straight road,
   attached the rocket to the roof of his car, ignited the rocket,
   and literally taken off.

   Investigators estimate that the Chevy Impala reached a speed of
   about 250-300 miles per hour.  Now that's a joy ride!

   Unfortunately, these solid-fuel rockets don't turn off once you
   ignite them; and straight roads don't run on forever.  You can
   just imagine this man's range of emotions during his escapade.
   First the exhilaration, then the slight worry once he realized
   that he hadn't planned on how to turn off the rocket,.  Next,
   panic when the brakes burned up followed by sheer terror when he
   saw the curve up ahead.

   According to news circulating on the Internet, this man has been
   nominated for this year's Darwin Award.  This award is an annual
   honor given to the person who did the gene pool the biggest
   service by killing himself in the most spectacular way.  (Last
   year's award was given to a man who killed himself when he tipped
   a Coke machine over on himself while trying to steal himself a
   free soda.)

   But ya know, I kinda gotta admire the guy for going after the
   thrill.

   ===================
   Bold New Initiative

   As the deadline for The Junto #29 approaches, the President has
   just announced a bold new initiative to transform the world as we
   know it, or it least score himself some cheap ratings points for
   the next election.  He has announced that smoking is bad and the
   FDA should have authority to regulate the sale and distribution of
   tobacco just like any other drug.  And in a brilliant campaign
   strategy move, he chose to announce this bold new initiative in
   the heart of tobacco country, North Carolina.  Our Democratic
   Governor was not amused.

   How insightful our President is.  How in tune he is with the
   times.  Congress is bothering with mundane issues like how the
   heck we are ever going to balance the budget and what we can do to
   keep the Medicare system from going bankrupt.  Those
   head-in-the-clouds politicians in Washington are holding hearings
   on the Waco massacre, which could arguably be the worst abuse of
   government power in recent history.  Those out of touch rascals we
   call representatives are wasting their time figuring out what to
   do about the Bosnian civil war.  What are these folks thinking?  I
   suppose the President will expect them all to set these issue
   aside and join him in a united, bipartisan war against tobacco.

   I guess after trying to sell the nation on gays in the military,
   Nationalizing the health care industry, the invasion of Haiti that
   wasn't called an invasion, establishing diplomatic relations with
   Viet Nam, the 50 billion dollar Bailout of the Mexican government,
   the Bosnian arms embargo, the President felt like he had to do
   Something.  Anything.  Anything at all to show that he is worthy
   of leading the nation.

   And yet, somehow, I think the President missed the boat on this
   one.  Despite his tobacco proposal being overwhelmingly popular, I
   think he has proven just how ineffective and out of touch he is.
   I mean, is this the best he can do?

   =================================================
   Hit `em Again! Hit `em Again!  Har-der!  Har-der!

   The AP News service reports that a long time fugitive by the name
   of Nick George Montos, who has the distinction of being the first
   man to ever be on the FBI's 10 most wanted list twice and who has
   been running from the law for nine years, has been apprehended by
   a 73 year old antique shop owner by the name of Sonia Paine.

   It seems that Mr.  Montos had tied up Ms.  Paine and was robbing
   her store.  But she was able to break free and the two got into a
   fighting match.  Mr.  Montos had managed to hit Ms.  Paine with a
   baseball bat and spray her with mace before she really got mad and
   wrestled the bat away from him and returned the slugs.  "I don't
   take any crap from anybody," Ms.  Paine said, "I beat the hell out
   of him."

   And a good thing, too.

   ======================================
   The Politicization Of Medical Research

   Once again, Senator Jesse Helms has managed to offend the
   sensibilities of many citizens by merely stating the obvious.  One
   might wonder if he is running for reelection.  In a recent
   interview with the New York

   Times, Helms called for a reduction in federal research money
   earmarked for AIDS research for two reasons.  First, he cites
   figures that indicate that AIDS is only the ninth leading cause of
   death in the United States, yet more federal money is spent on
   AIDS research than other research programs for more deadly
   illnesses.  Second, he calls for a reduction in federal research
   money because the disease is primarily spread by homosexuals
   engaging in "deliberate, disgusting, revolting conduct."

   There's little doubt that Senator Helms can back up his claims of
   disproportionate AIDS research funding with accurate government
   figures.  Others have made similar claims in the past.  And yet
   critics of Senator Helms can almost certainly cite different
   government figures that show fair and equitable funding with equal
   accuracy, thanks to the myriad of government programs involved and
   the labyrinthine ways that the government does its bookkeeping.

   Besides, many people will be quick to point out that, ideally,
   federal research money should not be a "quota" program in which
   money is doled out to various fields of research in proportion to
   their "importance."  Each area of research should receive the
   funds it needs to do through, prudent, yet efficient research.
   It's sad and unsettling to think of various fields of medical
   research being pitted against each other in a morbid battle for
   funds.

   But that's the way it is.  When one strips away the emotional
   rhetoric, Helms is correct in pointing out that federal research
   money is doled according to the political weights exercised by
   various lobbying efforts and special interest groups rather than
   any sort of noble evaluation of need or merit.  Even setting up a
   panel of scientists to set spending priorities on research
   programs rather than by politicians, as some have suggested,
   simply shifts the politicization to the selection of the panel.
   He who gets to choose who's on the panel more or less gets to
   determine how the funding will be doled out.  Distribution of
   federal money will always be politicized.  It's always been that
   way.  Everyone knows it.  Welcome to the world of politics.

   And while lamenting about the politicization of AIDS research
   funding, Helms is also engaging in political pandering of his own
   by trying to imply that funding AIDS research is a tacit approval
   of "deliberate, disgusting, revolting conduct."  Such rhetoric
   plays well with some of Senator Helms' constituents but one can
   use the same reasoning to justify cutting just about any other
   federal research one cares to.

   For example, there are millions of people in the country, many of
   whom live in Senator Helms own district, who regard smoking as
   ``deliberate, disgusting, revolting conduct'', yet we don't hear
   Senator Helms calling for an end to lung cancer research.  Nor do
   we hear him advocating the abolition of federal price support
   programs for tobacco.  Indeed, he is among the staunchest
   defenders of federal tobacco programs.

   Compassion for a human being's suffering is sometimes independent
   of one's approval or disapproval of that person.  One may feel
   compassion for someone suffering with AIDS while disapproving of
   his homosexual life-style that put him at risk.  One may feel
   compassion for a lung cancer patient while disapproving of the
   fact that he smokes.  So why is Helms campaigning for reductions
   in AIDS research but not lung cancer research?  Politics.  Pure
   and simple.

   One would like to imagine a world in which medical research was
   de-politicized, a world in which scientists did not have their
   agendas set by politicians pandering to their home constituency.
   The first step toward de-politicized medical research is to phase
   out federal funding entirely and to create tax incentives that
   favor and encourage medical research through independent,
   non-governmental institutions.  Medical research will only become
   de-politicized when it is funded by charitable organizations and
   compassionate individuals and politicians like Senator Helms are
   bypassed entirely.

   ===================
   The Net:  The Movie

   It seems that cyberspace is the hip place to make a movie these
   days.  There is Johnny Mnemonic, Virtuosity, the not yet released
   Strange Days, and The Net.

   So last weekend I trouped off to the local mid-night movie house
   to watch The Net.  I figured that if nothing else, it had Sandra
   Bullock in it.  As it turns out, Sandra Bullock is just about the
   only thing in the movie worthwhile.  She's currently enjoying her
   15 minutes of fame as the sexiest woman in American pop culture,
   and deservedly so.  It's been too long since the
   girl-next-door-whose-femininity-shines-through-despite-no
   -attempts-to-emphasize-it brand of sexy has been fashionable and I
   for one am glad to see its return.  But I still think Daisy
   Fuentes is the highest embodiment of that style, but I like Sandra
   Bullock also.

   But I digress.  The Net has a thoroughly unremarkable plot.
   Typical summer chase thriller.  Some chase scenes in visually
   interesting places.  A hint of sex, though not flagrant or
   gratuitous.  Some good beat up on the bad guy shots complete with
   a fire extinguisher across the jaw scene.  But there is nothing
   you haven't seen a jillion times before.

   Almost.  There are a couple of redeeming things about this movie.
   First, it has Sandra Bullock in it and she does a good job playing
   a computer geek.  She had all the mannerisms down pretty well.
   The crossed arms, not looking at people in the eye, the nervous,
   stuttering manner of speaking.  Of course all the computer geeks I
   know are slovenly, pasty guys and Sandra Bullock is trim,
   good-looking and very female.  Dennis Miller also has a small role
   as Sandra Bullock's obnoxious, self-centered,
   ex-lover/psyichiatrist (oh these complicated `90s).  He does a
   good job at it, but then such a role comes naturally for Dennis
   Miller.

   But the other redeeming quality in this movie is that the
   techno-babble is amazingly accurate, for a movie.  It appears that
   the screen writers paid a lot of attention to detail when dealing
   with the Net itself.

   They did have to invoke poetic license in a number of areas.  For
   one thing, The Net even during the best of times under the best of
   circumstances is not nearly as fast as was prtrayed in the movie.
   Also, they showed a lot of things visually that weren't
   necessarily visualized.  For example when a virus trashes your
   computer, the screen doesn't necessarily melt away into garbage.
   It is more likely to just go blank.

   But those are minor transgressions.  From what I understand about
   how the Internet is set up and how it's underlying protocols,
   TCP/ip, work, the movie showed Sandra Bullock's sleuthing on the
   net pretty darn accurately.  There's one scene where she's trying
   to access a site on the internet but trying to hide where she's
   dialing in from and it shows how she does that using the same
   technique that that East German spy ring was using to get into
   military computers a couple of years ago.  Also there's a scene in
   which she's trying to track down someone else's location on the
   internet and it appeared she was doing all the steps a person
   would have to go through to really do this on the internet.  Also
   the online chats seemed realistic, even down to the slang.  (Many
   techno movies put _too_much_ slang into characters'
   conversations).

   I also liked the way the bad guys operated in this movie.  The bad
   guys are the Praetorians and the are wreaking havoc all over the
   globe in order to get people to use a software security package
   that their front company sells.  The security package, called
   GateKeeper supposedly protects computers on the Internet from
   unauthorized intrusions, but it secretly has a way to let the
   Praetorians into the computer.  This giving the bad guys access to
   hundreds of Very Important Computers all over the world.  But they
   have to get people to install the GateKeeper software in the first
   place so they create panics in whihc, of course, the only
   computers unaffected are the ones guarded by the GateKeeper
   software.

   There were several other unrealistic bits in the movie, all of
   which can be explained away by poetic license.  For example, the
   movie's premise is based on the notion that all these Very
   Important Computers, like the New York Stock Exchange and the
   Federal Reserve are on the Internet.  But of course in real life
   they aren't, for the obvious security reasons.  But the only
   glaring inaccuracy that I couldn't excuse was in the movie's
   climatic scene in which Sandra Bullock destroys all of the
   Praetorian's work by running a PC virus on a mainframe computer.

   This just doesn't work.  `Mainframe' is a vague, over used, over
   generalized term that can mean just about anything.  But usually
   the term mainframe refers to computers built according to IBM's
   system 360 or System 390 architecture.  These beasts are the work
   horses of big business and are the best there is at efficiently
   slogging through all the junk that companies have to get done on a
   computer.  But they do not, can not run PC software.  So there was
   no way Sandra Bullock could have brought down the mainframe with
   her PC virus program.

   Still, I'd say it was worth seeing, though you might wait for it
   to come out at the $1 movies.

   =================================
   A Sentence or Two About Paragraph

   I subscribe to quite a few small magazines and if one were to
   judge magazines strictly in terms of how much they cost per word,
   Paragraph magazine would easily be the worst magazine I get.  But
   it's actually one of the best and one of my favorites.

   Paragraph magazine is, surprise, a magazine of paragraphs.  That
   is to say, there are no essays, stories, poems, or pictures in
   this publications.  The whole zine is a 4 inch square booklet
   consisting of 30 or 40 pages.  On each page is a single paragraph
   written by a different author.  They're sort of like short stories
   on steroids.  I'm constantly amazed at how much whallop a good
   author can pack into a single paragraph.

   Single issues are $4.00, but you can get a three issue
   subscription for $10.00.  The magazine comes out once per quarter
   I believe.  Paragraph Magazine can be ordered by writing to
   editors Walker Rumble and Karen Donovan at 18 Beach Point Drive,
   East Providence, RI 02915.

   ===============
   My First Record

   I can't exactly remember explicitly the first record I ever
   bought.  I can however remember the first record I ever owned.

   This was in 1977 or 1978.  I was living with my family in Corpus
   Christi Texas at the time.  I was in 7th grade, if I remember
   right.  Now at the junior high school I went to that year, you
   were allowed to like one of three bands.  AC/DC, KISS, or
   Aerosmith.  Why?  I don't know.  That's just the way it was back
   then.  It's like there was an unwritten law that had been passed
   someplace.

   But I had begun listening to the radio before I went to sleep at
   night, secretly.  Why did I have to do it secretly?  Were my
   parents monsters or something?  No not at all.  I'm sure they
   wouldn't have minded.  So I don't know why I felt the need to keep
   it a secret.  Anyway, I had this little pocket AM/FM radio, it was
   about the size of a large deck of card.  And I would tune it into
   the local rock'n'roll radio station put it under my pillow.  And
   I'd lay very quietly and listen to the songs.  I had to be very
   still be cause if moved my head too much, it would turn the tuning
   dial on the radio and lose the station.

   One of the big deals in Corpus Christi is that they have a Naval
   Air Station there, a big one.  And as I understand it, it is used
   to do a lot of the Navy's pilot training.  All I know is that
   almost every night, there was a steady stream of planes flying
   over the area.  It seemed like they were flying right over our
   house.  And if I held my head just right, I could see out the
   window in my bedroom and watch the planes fly across the sky while
   I listened to the radio.

   Imagine the perfect music to go with that scenario.  Late night,
   dark, dreamy, flying music.

   One night I heard it.  It was the Steve Miller Band.  The song was
   "Fly Like An Eagle" off the album by the same name.  I don't know
   if the album had just come out or if it was just the first time I
   ever heard it.  But at the time I thought it was the coolest song
   I had ever heard in my life.  So somehow I got it.  It was
   probably a birthday present, but I can't remember.  I do remember
   playing it for the first time and discovering that the whole album
   is like some sort of cosmic trip on a spaceship and the various
   songs are like new worlds being discovered on the way.

   Of course I carefully concealed this musical aberration of mine
   from my friends since it wasn't one of the approved listening
   choices in our junior high.  But I still own that album and every
   now and then I haul it out and play it.  And yes, I still think
   it's one of the coolest albums I've ever heard.

   ==================================================================
    Stuck In Traffic is a bi-monthly e-zine edited by, and mostly
   written by Calvin Stacy Powers.  Copyrights of individual articles
   are held by their respective authors.  All unsigned work is
   authored by Calvin Stacy Powers, who holds all copyrights.
   Permission is granted to redistribute Stuck In Traffic provided
   that it is redistributed in its entirety (including this copyright
   notice), and that no fee is charged.  For commercial
   redistribution rights, or for permission to reprint/redistribute
   individual articles contact Calvin Stacy Powers at
   [email protected].

   If you would like to receive Stuck In Traffic free by e-mail
   subscription send e-mail to the address listed above.